Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ejstronge
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
1.
▲
by
ejstronge
1y ago
> if it did I would have thought it would have appeared in the past 5 billion years or so It may have appeared and been outcompeted. That doesn’t suggest its (artificial) reintroduction would again be outcompeted
2.
▲
by
ejstronge
1y ago
> Organizations aren't limited to a single country. My current client has employees in most of, if not every, time zone across the world. In a single legal entity? > At any point in time a US based customer might invite a EU base
3.
▲
by
ejstronge
1y ago
> but in other situations there may be legal restrictions on reading employee-to-employee conversations. In which US jurisdictions can employee-to-employee records (from employer-owned communication media) be denied to the employer/
4.
▲
by
ejstronge
1y ago
> I'm not a woman, but I wonder how necessary pap smears (one of them most invasive procedures to which women are subjected) are if everyone's vaccinated against HPV? https://www.cuimc.columbia.edu/news/cer
5.
▲
by
ejstronge
1y ago
> > as a sibling commenter writes, well-studied cases of this are so rare that > And yet not a single cite in sight. A random commenter on orange site is not evidence At a certain point, one has to take on the obligation of self-ed
6.
▲
by
ejstronge
1y ago
> Spontaneous mutations? Which no matter how much you carve out modifiable risk factors will always be a thing. At least 5% of cervical cancers are HPV negative Random mutations causing cervical cancer essentially does not happen - as a
7.
▲
by
ejstronge
1y ago
> One of the rare examples of a mental health condition being virtually completely eliminated is that of General paresis of the insane, a symptom of late-stage syphilis. I think a better example is the very recent (i.e., in the 2000s) di
8.
▲
by
ejstronge
1y ago
> You can develop cervical cancer via some other route, but the vast, vast majority of cervical cancers are caused by HPV infection. What are these other ways? There's an intuition that bodies are like computer programs that can fa
9.
▲
by
ejstronge
1y ago
> No the context going out of control is overblow. Lemme example why. First you need to work at feature level. It shouldn't be too large of a feature in one go. As a meta point, why write ' Lemme example why.' ? If someone
10.
▲
by
ejstronge
1y ago
Here's a list of all the biosimilar products in this space: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12401705/#s4
11.
▲
by
ejstronge
1y ago
> As an example, courts ordered the Associated Press allowed back into the White House press pool after the Trump administration attempted to remove them. You or I would not be allowed to just show up at the president's events to wa
12.
▲
by
ejstronge
1y ago
I actually think the opposite is true. TV did not exist in the same way 50 years ago, so journalists played a more important role in transmitting news. Maybe you mean that those journalists were more specialized than the writers of today? I
13.
▲
by
ejstronge
1y ago
I likely have read at least one of the articles you were citing (or similar work) and my sense was that information was obtained later that was unclear at the time of the event. I see your point - especially when a journalist writes about a
14.
▲
by
ejstronge
1y ago
> I think it was just yesterday, I saw an article about an ICE raid of the Samsung plant in Georgia. It was a pretty long article, and even the tone of the article was pretty level. That said, there was a critical and very important piec
15.
▲
by
ejstronge
1y ago
> WSJ and the like just hire for pedigree. You end up with careerists writing generic articles, and injecting political opinion into everything I think your comment implies that journalism in some previous time did not 'just hire fo
16.
▲
by
ejstronge
1y ago
This is an area I work in professionally so I keep up with the technical side of things. > once you start adding more than one item to a cell it doesn't always work out. Very true, but the amounts of money at stake would justify the
17.
▲
by
ejstronge
1y ago
> This is very encouraging, but will take a long time to get to any type of usable treatment because these cells are literally made to evade the immune system they run a whole bunch of other risks. Also cell therapies right now are one o
18.
▲
by
ejstronge
1y ago
You may not know this, but pre-eclampsia is not a synonym for hypertension. Instead, hypertension is a manifestation of preeclampsia. The baby aspirin is not for hypertension (it does nothing for hypertension). Its goal is to prevent change
19.
▲
by
ejstronge
1y ago
>You wouldn't say excess alcohol consumption during pregnancy is only up to the mother's decision about her own body when there are adults walking around with terrible lives because of fetal alcohol syndrome. I would - because
20.
▲
by
ejstronge
1y ago
> Yeah my wife is also pregnant and sometimes it is really tough on her but she doesn't use any medication other than baby aspirin for blood pressure. The alternative is exercise, anti-inflammatory foods, and also realizing that it
21.
▲
by
ejstronge
1y ago
First, this is different because this was not what was agreed when Intel sought the grant. So I reserve the right to see as ‘bad’ a coercive action. Second, from your article: ‘ Commerce expects "upside sharing will only be material in
22.
▲
by
ejstronge
1y ago
There's no reason to re-invent the wheel - ipcamtalk has a comprehensive set of explanatory posts. Don't buy Reolink, avoid Amcrest - Loryta (rebranded Dahua) and Hikvision are the strongest, but there are other strong options, es
23.
▲
by
ejstronge
1y ago
> I highly doubt there'll ever be research in this area, but I'm very curious about whether it'll ever be possible to induce schizophrenia for a time, similar to how psychedelics or dissociatives can induce altered mind st
24.
▲
by
ejstronge
1y ago
> I imagine many people will react only to the headline and not read the article [...] I saw this line in the article: "Meta tells The Verge that it’s not currently training its AI models on those photos, but it would not answer our
25.
▲
by
ejstronge
1y ago
> The US certainly extradites loads of people from other countries who still reside there and only broke laws either “online” or through transactions involving the US This further weakens the dishonest posture that tourists are not subj
26.
▲
by
ejstronge
1y ago
>trump estimation so far: 81-103 biden estimation: 14-28 >You are incorrect. You are clearly partisan. The GP says nothing about the number, but is instead the impact. You should also consider normalizing the number of injunctions to
27.
▲
by
ejstronge
1y ago
It’s curious you don’t link to a source even though you pasted something that contains references - I suspect you know that you are misinterpreting this willfully. > The author of the clause didn't think it applied to the children o
28.
▲
by
ejstronge
1y ago
> tourist parents here for a few weeks (for example) aren't subject to the jurisdiction of America. It's a valid argument to make, even if you come down on a different side This ‘jurisdiction’ claim essentially only applied to
29.
▲
by
ejstronge
1y ago
> SOTA seems to use huge population data to infer causality within each linkage block of interest in the genome. This has existed for at least a decade, maybe two. > There is a concerning gap between prediction and causality. Which ca
30.
▲
by
ejstronge
1y ago
> An analysis is not "news". The analysis refers to things that just happened in May. 'New' things that happened in May.
More ›