duesabati

6 ms·

1.
by duesabati 6d ago
I can't point my finger to anything right now, but I feel that the quality of code still matters because afterall LLMs are trained on what we did, so it feels natural to me to still have them write the code in a good manner (DDD, SOLID
2.
by duesabati 3mo ago
I really can't believe there are people that still think this is about terrorism in 2026, at least not on HN
3.
by duesabati 4mo ago
While I think everything written in this post is correct, what really is starting bothering me is this over-focus/attention on data even when what you want to express is behavior, let me explain: The post talks about "transition i
4.
by duesabati 5mo ago
Yeah exactly, came to the comments just for this check
5.
by duesabati 5mo ago
I think this project is super interesting and I really like the rust inspiration here. How can one get in touch with you and/or help out the project?
6.
by duesabati 6mo ago
You mean as arguments that proves the author's pov? Yeah definitely
7.
by duesabati 6mo ago
With ALL due respect (seriously), this is just a misconception of yours. When you write software to solve a problem you start with as little as possible details such that when you read it, it would only talk about the business logic. What I
8.
by duesabati 7mo ago
I can see that too, this might be a reason for its success, all the articles are very straightforward and full of paths you may encounter
9.
by duesabati 7mo ago
Me too, I started with Debian but after a few weeks, I found myself being more on the Arch wiki than the Debian's one so I did the switch and never used any other distro. I'm sorry to say this but Debian's documentation sucke
10.
by duesabati 7mo ago
I think you you're missing the point though, he did not say that adding those constraints was a bad idea per se, but they are leading to a bad path. If the path is "just add more guard-rails" then we will get to a point where
11.
by duesabati 8mo ago
Yeah I can see that, but that lisp feature is not exclusive to lisp, if you know what you want and what you are doing you can implement the very same thing in any other language, you may say it is convenient that lisp already has it, but it
12.
by duesabati 8mo ago
I understand and agree, what I was trying to say is that one should not confine ones thinking by the constraints of a tool, would it be a programming language or whole framework, but to express everything as freely as possible without detai
13.
by duesabati 8mo ago
No I wasn't, it was a really interesting read thank you, but that blog post seem to me like an argument for me not the OP point of view, because if you refuse to understand how things work by blindly delegating to libraries and framewo
14.
by duesabati 8mo ago
I completely disagree with the post. All programming languages are equivalent meaning their level of expressiveness is the same, it's not an opinion it's a fact. Each language comes with its runtime and its peculiarities but poten
15.
by duesabati 1y ago
I was very interested in Graphene, do you have other grounds for your suspicions?
16.
by duesabati 1y ago
Without taking anything away from the author, I think he could have saved a few words by simply defining the point that events should be seen as commands rather than messages or passed-events.
17.
by duesabati 1y ago
> America First > anti-Israel American Government became the parody of itself, so sad
18.
by duesabati 1y ago
I really love where Deno is going, it really is what Node should've been. My only concern is that they lose patience to their hype-driven competition and start doing hype-driven stuff themselves.