Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
djbebs
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
1.
▲
by
djbebs
4y ago
It seems to me you were supporting the op when he said >It could be nice if companies would be forced to set up collective workers representation entities when they reach a certain numbers of employees, where I am the limit is of 50 empl
2.
▲
by
djbebs
4y ago
Don't use it? How can I do that when I'm legally forced to do so?
3.
▲
by
djbebs
4y ago
No thanks, please stop forcing me to be unemployed.
4.
▲
by
djbebs
4y ago
>There would be no avenue at all for someone to make money on the actual content. Except this is trivially disprovable by simply looking at YouTube. Copyright plays essentially zero role in the business models of the vast majority of suc
5.
▲
by
djbebs
4y ago
That seems to indicate to me that the original work is actually not under copyright, since if it is the only method of achieving such an image in such a style, then there is no originality to be copyrighted.
6.
▲
by
djbebs
4y ago
Good thing population is reducing, isn't it?
7.
▲
by
djbebs
4y ago
There are no legitimate reasons to go on my property.
8.
▲
by
djbebs
4y ago
So are you going to be protesting against the democratic party for doing so in 2016?
9.
▲
by
djbebs
4y ago
Except that's not true. At the end of the day all stock market returns come from one's of 3 things: Dividends Earnings per Share growth Multiple expansion Over the long run the speculation that you so decry ( which amounts to Mult
10.
▲
by
djbebs
4y ago
Of course they reflect build costs, as well as regulatory costs...
11.
▲
by
djbebs
4y ago
From personal experience cost of living in portugal is in line with germany.
12.
▲
by
djbebs
4y ago
There is no lack of space in portugal to build housing in. The "housing crisis" is 100% a political choice by portuguese voters.
13.
▲
by
djbebs
4y ago
I never stopped being.
14.
▲
by
djbebs
4y ago
Because the ones paying for that increase in productivity should be the ones receiving the benefits from it. That is, the shareholders who own the business and paid for the machines, not the employees who merely operate them.
15.
▲
by
djbebs
4y ago
Will you be moving away from stripe after this?
16.
▲
by
djbebs
4y ago
Why do you believe there is more engagement in mastodon than in a platform designed to maximize engagement?
17.
▲
by
djbebs
4y ago
The employees made that choice for themselves when they chose to start working for Pixar. They make that choice everyday they chose to keep working for it.
18.
▲
by
djbebs
4y ago
Often you're not legally allowed to spend it if you do that.
19.
▲
by
djbebs
4y ago
He included inflation, and there's plenty of tax advantaged accounts that let you grow tax free
20.
▲
by
djbebs
4y ago
Bingo! All these complaints that productivity growth has been matched by salary growth always seems to ignore that most of the productivity gains have been the result of capital expenditure, not of workers being better at their jobs.
21.
▲
by
djbebs
4y ago
You're incorrect.
22.
▲
by
djbebs
4y ago
Given the information currently available, probably not, but that doesn't mean they should be silenced.
23.
▲
by
djbebs
4y ago
Land ownership is not the constraint to housing that you think it is. I can buy thousands of square meters of land that is physically able to support housing for a negligible amount of money. The land is useless to me because construction i
24.
▲
by
djbebs
4y ago
You don't need to use credit cards.
25.
▲
by
djbebs
4y ago
There is no free rider problem.
26.
▲
by
djbebs
4y ago
Because that same issue happens today with the current welfare problems. People like to pretend it doesn't, but it does.
27.
▲
by
djbebs
4y ago
Because businesses are owned by people who in turn are taxed. In effect any corporation tax is a double tax.
28.
▲
by
djbebs
4y ago
Not having laws that actively enable the stalking is a good start
29.
▲
by
djbebs
4y ago
Installing a public toilet in a park cost 1.7 million dollars and years worth of effort, for something that a random contractor would have built for 10k dollars in a pair of afternoons.
30.
▲
by
djbebs
4y ago
I dont need to make that argument. You need to make the argument that I shouldn't be able to.
More ›