Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
dhhwrongagain
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
1.
▲
by
dhhwrongagain
6y ago
What a mess. We should just return to catholic monarchy or at very least restrict voting to a trusted nobility. Democracy is really just a euphemism for rule by the media, and the media just serves private corporate interests. it’s unrealis
2.
▲
by
dhhwrongagain
6y ago
What does the pizza emoji at the end of the article mean?
3.
▲
Whole Foods Secretly Upgrades Tech to Target and Squash Unionizing Efforts
(observer.com)
11 points
by
dhhwrongagain
6y ago
|
0 comments
4.
▲
by
dhhwrongagain
6y ago
No, he explicitly states that women roughly have same average iq as men and are equally competent and capable to do engineering work. OTOH personality traits aren’t distributed equally between men and women. Personality traits don’t impact
5.
▲
by
dhhwrongagain
6y ago
Damore never claimed women were intrinsically less inclined to engineering. He cited the big five personality trait model as evidence for why engineering culture is not welcoming to women.
6.
▲
by
dhhwrongagain
6y ago
You have to keep saying it because you haven’t explained why referencing suckless has any bearing on whether the project will support CJK. In particular you have no basis for this statement: “Ok, this is a bit of a offtopic rant, but this p
7.
▲
by
dhhwrongagain
6y ago
Are you serious? Of course the question comes with the reasonable assumption that the proper declaration has been made especially since it’s a well known standard function. Additionally memset() is not a variadic function. You said the type
8.
▲
by
dhhwrongagain
6y ago
It was baseless. You had no evidence CJK will not be supported. It was just a baseless condemnation of the project because the readme referenced suckless.
9.
▲
by
dhhwrongagain
6y ago
> The underlying intent may well be that, but it is couched in both ignorance and callous disregard for others. Nope, that’s just your projection. You’re callously disregarding him.
10.
▲
by
dhhwrongagain
6y ago
Good faith is just as much about assuming good intent as it is about assuming genuineness. All of those statements are a far cry from “fuck everyone else.” The underlying intent could just as easily be “this can help more people.” It’s an u
11.
▲
by
dhhwrongagain
6y ago
There actually was a point. His point is that, while it might seem counterintuitive, allowing suppliers to price with demand may improve the situation for the majority of people, even if that permits a minority of individuals to fall by the
12.
▲
by
dhhwrongagain
6y ago
Sounds like you’re just having an emotional reaction instead of engaging his point in good faith. If you’re so empathetic, maybe you should remember that the person who made that point is a human being and not a monster.
13.
▲
by
dhhwrongagain
6y ago
I agree but he said the types needed to be corrected. As far as I know the types were already correct.
14.
▲
by
dhhwrongagain
6y ago
The parent was definitely talking about the applicability of using assembly in the context of this project. Vectorization is irrelevant here.
15.
▲
by
dhhwrongagain
6y ago
What observable difference is there between malloc(0) and malloc((size_t)0)?
16.
▲
by
dhhwrongagain
6y ago
Program bloat is not due to poor compiler optimization. It’s due to runtime size and a lack of effort to make runtimes smaller. In particular the c runtime.
17.
▲
by
dhhwrongagain
6y ago
False or vacuously true
18.
▲
by
dhhwrongagain
6y ago
All of the performance wins you’re referencing come from vectorization, you typically can’t vectorize OS code since it isn’t ALU bound, which makes your point moot.
19.
▲
by
dhhwrongagain
6y ago
Is memset(malloc(0), 0, 0) undefined behavior?
20.
▲
by
dhhwrongagain
6y ago
That’s not true. Many people write code on Mac despite kernel extensions being disabled and SIP. What will be considered root will be a superficial emulation convincing enough to fool most Unix software
21.
▲
by
dhhwrongagain
6y ago
Get ready to not have root access on your laptop. The writing is on the wall: * signed software restrictions * no kernel extensions * SIP Dropping x86 compatibility will be the last nail in the coffin. Buy the x86 platform if yo
22.
▲
by
dhhwrongagain
6y ago
Yeah that’s a very good point. There may be multiple reasons but a performance reason of which I’m aware is downward stacks are more efficient for allocating aligned memory: sp = (sp - size) & align; That’s only two instruction
23.
▲
by
dhhwrongagain
7y ago
It’s sad to live in a world where people are naive enough to assume that doing the right thing without incentive is commonplace. You must be great to negotiate with.
24.
▲
by
dhhwrongagain
7y ago
Probably 100K people max will see this website and the audience is probably skewed toward people who are already well educated on covid-19 precautions
25.
▲
by
dhhwrongagain
7y ago
I guess the premise of his comment is that there is a finite amount of money to be invested across all YC participants each season and that “back room” deals prevent startups that are less connected from having the same opportunity. Demo da
26.
▲
by
dhhwrongagain
7y ago
DHH is misusing the term “red pill” here. He’s saying he’s accepted an inevitable negative outcome, not that he’s been exposed to a hidden truth. The term he’s looking for is “black pill.”