devhead

6 ms·

1.
by devhead 2y ago
I wonder if this may mean we will see the Terraform dogmatic approach to declining to implement much requested functionality in the name of "it doesn't fit our ideals" go by the wayside. I hope so, otherwise, OpenTofu here I
2.
by devhead 2y ago
we'll see what the courts say with this. American government used to decry "the great china firewall" yet here they come all holding hands to raise up an American one, against the American people. This is not a Ban on TikTok,
3.
by devhead 3y ago
It's not a ban on TikTok; they are proposing a restriction that will be applied to American companies in order to try and block American's access to an online web service. I do not agree with such restrictions nor would I if the r
4.
by devhead 3y ago
agreed, such as Equifax; after it was breached and our, coughs, "stolen data" was stolen from them.
5.
by devhead 3y ago
i second this approach, it's a good practice to meet people where they are at and as it is an "open minded" environment, this should be the expectation, not a conformity to the norm.
6.
by devhead 3y ago
i'll take one of each, for science; will report back in a few years how i'm getting along.
7.
by devhead 3y ago
surprised no one mentioned, give them a promotion.
8.
by devhead 3y ago
reminds me of the convo i had with the ceo randomly after an episode of Silicon Valley and he asked about security because they hacked a fridge...i said yep, super easy; we had a bigger budget the next week :D
9.
by devhead 3y ago
at least they survived Y2K :D
10.
by devhead 3y ago
i suspect they meant the CIO; i agree, it was their role to relay the real need here not just push a request over without already securing approval from the rest of their c suite peers.
11.
by devhead 3y ago
I worked for a crypto startup for a year, mostly as a side hustle; not on there because ftx crashed and Alameda Research was an investor. 80% of us were laid off two weeks before christmas. they don't deserve a mention and i don't
12.
by devhead 3y ago
for such an anti-customer change; the lack of depth in their announcement is terrifying. Perhaps their impacted customer base is so low they just don't care, but if this is all they're putting out about it shame on them. i have no
13.
by devhead 3y ago
hope they sting him after they are done buzzing. he is not a candidate I could ever get behind. we are still dealing with the fallout of the last morally bankrupt president who is trying to run again.
14.
by devhead 3y ago
i would add that this must include executives; 2 years ago we all got the same 3% while executives got 40% (while overseeing a stock drop of 65%). one side effect though is w/o equity it's easy to feel a lack of motivation to work
15.
by devhead 3y ago
keeping your servers on the public network is not a good idea for a variety of reasons such as security, cost, control, access and compliance. AWS makes money, it's a trade off; you can just as well put up an ec2 as a nat that is able
16.
by devhead 3y ago
The amount of corporations and government agencies that scrape/pull/share our public data is greater than just OpenAI and M$; so get them all involved as defendants. In the US, the absent of strong data protections is a result of
17.
by devhead 3y ago
My plan is to wait until AI can just tell me it wants me to do for it. be it technical or back rubs. :D
18.
by devhead 3y ago
nice. I fight to keep any dev langs from being installed directly; docker keeps me from having to fight between versions. (exception: Terraform, using chtf for the win).
19.
by devhead 3y ago
how nice; not liable for failures and at the same time, not subject to governments open records act. basically, can do whatever they want without any accountability or liability. just the way the framers wanted it. freedom? i think not.
20.
by devhead 3y ago
Same here. I always default to "I work in IT". If that person is in the space I might go into specifics; but even then majority can't relate or understand the role i spend my days working in. It also has the benefit of coming
21.
by devhead 3y ago
might need regulation to prevent insurance companies from collecting this info and using it to kick people off insurance or raise their rates until they can't afford it. Perhaps further, we get rid of the need for a private middle man
22.
by devhead 3y ago
for my company we still see it in use after all these years and countless security incidents because it's just left there. I could not personally ever imagine wanting to install that and thinking it's a good thing. Recently I have
23.
by devhead 3y ago
be interesting to see where the contract states they need to delete that data let alone provide evidence of it out of all systems and services... gtfo
24.
by devhead 3y ago
When is anyone going to ask him how he shows up for all his jobs at the same time in their office? - SpaceX (CEO) - Tesla, Inc. (CEO) - Twitter (CEO
25.
by devhead 3y ago
i personally do not like either of those techniques; send me a link to your features, have a demo we can sign up for without a phone call, and please have pricing posted. I find that often in the vendor selection process, i'm already n
26.
by devhead 4y ago
Some of their problems are tied to their severe tech debt, weak leadership, poor vision of the future, lack of understading of the present, all the while relying on 3rd parties to profit instead of them actually making a better product and
27.
by devhead 4y ago
salesforce should raise their hand here
28.
by devhead 4y ago
kids don't have credit cards; the organization should have been providing free paid hosting with git support and ability to deploy through github actions...it should have been: git and github is a requirement for hosting your code. imh
29.
by devhead 4y ago
the company has a value from it's stocks; it's stocks have a value from the company... which means it's just as scammy as was said about crypto. either way, they both have value; it's just about the market.
30.
by devhead 4y ago
jumping on the bandwagon.

More ›