Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
dbuser99
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
1.
▲
by
dbuser99
8d ago
I would imagine these folks are being treated like gods at their companies. And having access to all the money/fame. It is not surprising they see themselves above all
2.
▲
by
dbuser99
8d ago
It’s hard to give openai the benefit of doubt here
3.
▲
by
dbuser99
2mo ago
Yea he only runs one of the biggest technology companies in the world.
4.
▲
by
dbuser99
3mo ago
I suppose they should. That seems like the right, or at least a related, discipline for some of the questions raised by ai developments. But i cannot help but feel completely unenthusiastic about the idea of the AI labs controlling the narr
5.
▲
by
dbuser99
4mo ago
Not sure i would trust coinbase with any cyrpto from now on.
6.
▲
by
dbuser99
8mo ago
I don’t get it. This whole thing says single writer does not scale, so we stopped writing as much and removed reads away from it, so it works ok and we decided that’s enough. I guess thats great.
7.
▲
by
dbuser99
1y ago
Sometimes it is convenient that there are no backups. Just saying…
8.
▲
by
dbuser99
1y ago
So sam was getting paid - possibly in egregious amounts while lying to congress?
9.
▲
by
dbuser99
2y ago
AI has to be the solution to everything to justify the kind of investments going into it right now. Sam’s a savvy businessman so he obviously understands that and goes few steps further. He promises exponential returns and addresses any reg
10.
▲
by
dbuser99
2y ago
Don’t think you will become as rich as musk, sam
11.
▲
by
dbuser99
2y ago
100% agreed. If you read this piece from the lens of a SV executive or VC it makes perfect sense and serves the interests of all parties. Content? Who cares
12.
▲
by
dbuser99
2y ago
What are you on about? They publish their research advancing the field. And gemini has caught up with openai and anybody else.
13.
▲
by
dbuser99
2y ago
Financial rewards. Money. Investors could not take the risk of disturbing the value of their investment. It is that simple
14.
▲
by
dbuser99
2y ago
Man. No wonder openai is nothing without its people
15.
▲
by
dbuser99
2y ago
In this particular case of sharding a postgresql solution, in my opinion, the parent is right. Any major cloud provider would give companies of their scale assistance. This is their bread and butter. The posts likely hide the requirement of
16.
▲
by
dbuser99
3y ago
That’s wildly inaccurate. Musk regularly displays a much higher level of tech skills compared to most CEOs, with the exception of a few, like maybe Jensen. You may not like musk, but musks way above someone like altman in technical skills
17.
▲
by
dbuser99
3y ago
OpenAI is nothing without its people!
18.
▲
by
dbuser99
3y ago
Once again the house (the VCs) wins. I for one don’t trust openAI for one bit after this soap opera
19.
▲
by
dbuser99
3y ago
The kind of pressure microsoft is able to exert here is mind blowing. The hero worshipping they were able to cultivate, with so much media pressure, they truly control our lives
20.
▲
by
dbuser99
3y ago
They should not have expected the OpenAI staff to follow Ilya after Sams exit. Sam’s policies are a lot more lucrative for the openAI staff. The staff is acting in their own interest as well
21.
▲
by
dbuser99
3y ago
The talent also goes wherever the money is
22.
▲
by
dbuser99
3y ago
Obvious manipulation by microsoft. Its like 1999 again
23.
▲
by
dbuser99
3y ago
They are obviously a duo that were pushing things together. But we will learn more over time.
24.
▲
by
dbuser99
6y ago
Leetcode is not a good indicator of quality code by any means. It's basically a filter. If one can't solve these programming questions, there is a higher chance that they are not good at programming compared to one who can.
25.
▲
by
dbuser99
7y ago
Would that include transactions for which the reads can query the whole database as opposed to a predetermined set of rows?
26.
▲
by
dbuser99
7y ago
Exactly. Facebook strategy is always let's generalize the problem so that our competitors are also affected, this way we can dilute the discussion, change the narrative (and also end up doing nothing concrete).