Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
dagenix
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
1.
▲
by
dagenix
5d ago
How did they fix it?
2.
▲
by
dagenix
2mo ago
Bank account interest is pretty much always less than inflation. So, money sitting in a bank account for 18 years is just losing value.
3.
▲
by
dagenix
2mo ago
I have no idea how well such a system works, but, I found these lines pretty jarring: > They found it fires on ordinary driving, not just distracted driving. > Glance away from an empty highway to take in the scenery, or look at the i
4.
▲
The Guix Nix Abomination: Leveraging Guix Derivations in Nix
(fzakaria.com)
63 points
by
dagenix
3mo ago
|
0 comments
5.
▲
GenCAD
(gencad.github.io)
441 points
by
dagenix
4mo ago
|
127 comments
6.
▲
by
dagenix
4mo ago
If you don't like the debian model, didn't use debian. There are people that like the debian model, it seems like you aren't one of them, though. That doesn't make them wrong.
7.
▲
by
dagenix
4mo ago
My understanding is that existing Ebay shareholders would get half cash and half stock. In order to actually profit, those shareholders would need to believe that the combined company's stock could be sold off without taking a signific
8.
▲
by
dagenix
8mo ago
https://archive.ph/ZMsnQ
9.
▲
by
dagenix
11mo ago
I strongly suspect that its not feasible to colocate pijul and git. git and jj are based on snapshots, while pijul is based on patches. They have very different models.
10.
▲
by
dagenix
11mo ago
One thing JJ has that git doesn't is the concept of first class conflicts. In JJ, rebasing or merging never fails, but it might record a conflict to resolve later. Git, on the otherhand, forces you to drop we everything to resolve conf
11.
▲
YouTube agrees to pay Trump $24M to settle lawsuit over Jan. 6 suspension
(npr.org)
10 points
by
dagenix
1y ago
|
1 comments
12.
▲
by
dagenix
1y ago
You are supposed to supervise Tesla FSD. Waymo doesn't require someone in the driver's seat at all. They aren't the same thing.
13.
▲
by
dagenix
1y ago
The problem, IMO, with asyncio is that its way, way too complicated. In my experience, anyio ( https://github.com/agronholm/anyio ) provides a much better interface on top of asyncio. And since it can use asyncio as a ba
14.
▲
by
dagenix
1y ago
In my experience, the key to using asyncio is to use anyio. Anyio is an interface that you can use ontop of asyncio and fixes most of its shortcomings. https://anyio.readthedocs.io
15.
▲
by
dagenix
1y ago
I'm not dismissing uv, I'm critiquing the article.
16.
▲
by
dagenix
1y ago
> This approach eliminates the need for complex setup tools like requirements.txt or package managers... And yet, the rest of the article is about uv. According to uv itself: > An extremely fast Python package and project manager, wri
17.
▲
by
dagenix
2y ago
It doesn't seem like https://comma.ai/ has sources either.
18.
▲
by
dagenix
2y ago
I especially like how there is next to no mention about safety on the main page. But at least its only $999 and it has AI and 50k GitHub stars, so, thats nice.
19.
▲
by
dagenix
2y ago
So, a hackier version of Tesla's autopilot? Sounds, uh, terrifying.
20.
▲
by
dagenix
2y ago
The pretty significant updates to MacOS support are really cool to see!
21.
▲
by
dagenix
2y ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G._K._Chesterton#Chesterton's_...
22.
▲
Technical Analysis of Men's 100M Final Photo Finish
(old.reddit.com)
1 points
by
dagenix
2y ago
|
0 comments
23.
▲
by
dagenix
2y ago
I don't believe its in the standard library for Rust, even if it is very popular in the Rust ecosystem.
24.
▲
by
dagenix
2y ago
Java does jit
25.
▲
by
dagenix
2y ago
> Yes, but the absence of the GIL would make race conditions more likely to happen. Does it though? I'm not saying it doesn't, I'm quite curious. Switching between threads with the GIL is already fairly unpredictable from
26.
▲
by
dagenix
2y ago
> But there is a lot of pure Python code out there that is not written that way. Removal of the GIL would allow such code to be naively run in multiple threads using, for example, Python's support for thread pools. I guess this is w
27.
▲
by
dagenix
2y ago
Yup, I think its described here: https://docs.python.org/3/c-api/init.html#releasing-the-gil-... . My understanding, is that many extensions will release the GIL when doing anything expensive. So, if you are doing
28.
▲
by
dagenix
2y ago
> If your Python code assumes it's just going to run in a single thread now, and it is run in a single thread without the GIL, yes, removing the GIL will make no difference. I'm not sure I understand your point. Yes, singled th
29.
▲
by
dagenix
2y ago
The GIL prevents the corruption of Pythons internal structures. It's hard to remove because: 1. Lots of extensions, which can control when they release the GIL unlike regular Python code, depend on it 2. Removing the GIL requires some
30.
▲
by
dagenix
2y ago
Are you writing an extension or Python code? If you are writing Python code, the GIL can already be dropped at pretty much any point and there isn't much way of controlling when. Iirc, this includes in the middle of things like +=. The
More ›