cxr

11 ms·

1.
by cxr 8d ago
It wasn't just the use of absolute positioning that wouldn't have worked. CSS didn't even exist yet.
2.
by cxr 9d ago
I don't understand this common response. I'm a former Mozillian and a lifelong Firefox user (continuously since Firefox has existed, at least). I know Firefox is slower. I can feel it and have felt it on every system I've e
3.
by cxr 9d ago
> We all know how this sentence ends, "You should start a ..." and it isn't rss feed. I don't know what this means. I'm guessing the correct answer is supposed to be "podcast"? Even so, weird false di
4.
by cxr 10d ago
Pretty much every podcast in the world and all of their listeners are using RSS. WordPress powers something like 30% of the Web, and most of the operators behind those sites are publishing RSS whether they know it or not.
5.
by cxr 10d ago
You have made two concrete claims about Codeberg that are verifiably untrue: "Codeberg does not permit personal repos" "A private git repo with my own code, is not permitted" Codeberg's policy explicitly permits per
6.
by cxr 11d ago
You have made two concrete claims about Codeberg that are verifiably untrue: "Codeberg does not permit personal repos" "A private git repo with my own code, is not permitted" Codeberg's policy explicitly permits per
7.
by cxr 11d ago
> So, not code for personal projects? Right? No, not right. Still wrong: " Use it for your personal notes, your side project or any other[sic] you want to keep private ". (That's even ignoring that I was addressing the cl
8.
by cxr 11d ago
The amount of Codeberg FUD one can encounter on HN is unreal. I'm starting to question whether there's an organized effort behind it. Both personal and private repos are explicitly permitted in the Codeberg TOS: > Private repo
9.
by cxr 12d ago
> At best, registering an OAuth client is 5 minutes of clicking around a developer portal. But you never know.[…] DCR automates the client registration problem. Instead of requiring a human to manually get an OAuth client, your app dynam
10.
by cxr 13d ago
Consider whether you'd be questioning this if the author had written that within minutes of his daughter being born, her photo was on Facebook. The only thing it suffers from is not being normalized and taking marginally more* effort,
11.
by cxr 14d ago
That's not accurate. A valid understanding of the form/process should result in an expectation of a referral to RSTEP to evaluate the impact on security and stability. But that didn't happen.
12.
by cxr 14d ago
This is a gross misunderstanding of the situation surrounding Mozilla revenue and Firefox development expenses.
13.
by cxr 16d ago
Aristo already exists and looks great: < https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&query=aristo%20cxr&sor... >
14.
by cxr 16d ago
(For those not catching on that the claim was written in jest, the person commenting here is not the creator of this project nor have they committed any code.)
15.
Building native plugin systems with WebAssembly components (2025)(tartanllama.xyz)
2 points by cxr 16d ago|0 comments
16.
by cxr 18d ago
(2020)
17.
by cxr 20d ago
Since this presupposes Markdown of the flavor that comes with YAML frontmatter, and that frontmatter is doing all of the heavy lifting, this is more like a YAML database than a "Markdown database". In any case, nowhere is it indic
18.
by cxr 22d ago
Have you considered reaching out to users who actually create and own the material published on Twitter to work out a deal whereby xcancel.com would be permitted to publish their posts (regardless of what the cease and desist says)?
19.
by cxr 28d ago
Nope.
20.
by cxr 29d ago
The scope of confusion expands unabated. 1. I am not Codeberg. 2. Turning away people doing unwanted things is the whole purpose of Codeberg's new policy. Why you present this as a undesirable side effect rather than exactly what the
21.
by cxr 1mo ago
> If you use AI at all for any code in the project it cannot be hosted on codeberg. They made that pretty clear in their blog post. No, they didn't. That's not what the blog post says. > You can read it yourself I didn&#x2
22.
by cxr 1mo ago
I suspect the fidelity of your comment to your actual level of confusion is low. In any case, if you're really this confused by the information provided earlier, then the chances aren't good that there's anything that anyone
23.
by cxr 1mo ago
You've made the same exaggerated claim in two comments. Not only are you not banned from Codeberg if you have used LLMs to help you write code "in any of your projects", but you're not even prohibited from using LLMs to
24.
by cxr 1mo ago
This reads like someone who either never had one of these jobs and is left to try to use their imagination, or someone who is knowingly misrepresenting what consequences are awaiting low-level employees purely by choice. Either way, the con
25.
by cxr 1mo ago
> it's not an "invalid argument" to share your experience < https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motte-and-bailey_fallacy >
26.
by cxr 1mo ago
> I didn't mean to say the critique isn't valid, nor did I say that, you're putting words in my mouth there. Is this performance art?
27.
by cxr 1mo ago
But GitHub has _bad_ Markdown support. GFM is the reason why so many projects on GitHub are besot with Markdown that's unreadable in a text editor.
28.
by cxr 1mo ago
You moved the goalposts from "The simplest way to build a high-quality website" to "there are benefits to using Astro". > The thing you linked doesn't meet the bar I'm aiming for, either for the resulting si
29.
by cxr 1mo ago
I'm responding to a specific claim that you put at the top of the page the linked to. > the [dependencies] used here were carefully selected because they do provide a benefit. You're moving the goalposts.
30.
Archival Resource Key (ARK) Alliance(arks.org)
12 points by cxr 1mo ago|0 comments

More ›