5 ms·

> So, not code for personal projects? Right? No, not right. Still wrong: "Use it for your personal notes, your side project or any other[sic] you want to kee

by cxr 11d ago

> So, not code for personal projects? Right? No, not right. Still wrong: "Use it for your personal notes, your side project or any other[sic] you want to keep private". (That's even ignoring that I was addressing the claim that you actually made, which is different from the one you're making now; you're moving the goalposts.)

jeremyjh 11d ago
That language is not in the terms of service. The word "side" does not appear on that page. The terms of service state: > Private repositories are only allowed for things required for FLOSS projects, like storing secrets, team-internal discussions or hiding projects from the public until they're ready for usage and/or contribution. They are also allowed for really small & personal stuff like your journal, config files, ideas or notes, but explicitly not as a personal cloud or media storage. The TOS Section 1: > Our service is open for all projects covered by a licence for free and open source software, free and open source hardware, or free cultural works as defined by § 2 (1) 1. So the "FUD" I am spreading is literally the headline of the legal terms of service. There is an organization behind the spread of this information, and it is Codeberg e.V.
- cxr 11d ago
  You have made two concrete claims about Codeberg that are verifiably untrue: "Codeberg does not permit personal repos" "A private git repo with my own code, is not permitted" Codeberg's policy explicitly permits personal repos, including private code repos. Both of your claims are false. There is no getting around this, no matter how much you try to move the goalposts or the other forms of conversational misdirection you're trying to pull off here.
- deleted 10d ago
  [deleted]
- cxr 10d ago
  You have made two concrete claims about Codeberg that are verifiably untrue: "Codeberg does not permit personal repos" "A private git repo with my own code, is not permitted" Codeberg's policy explicitly permits personal repos, including private code repos. Both of your claims are false. There is no getting around this, no matter how much you try to move the goalposts or the other forms of conversational misdirection you're trying to pull off here.
deleted 11d ago
[deleted]

by cxr 11d ago

jeremyjh 11d ago

That language is not in the terms of service. The word "side" does not appear on that page. The terms of service state: > Private repositories are only allowed for things required for FLOSS projects, like storing secrets, team-internal discussions or hiding projects from the public until they're ready for usage and/or contribution. They are also allowed for really small & personal stuff like your journal, config files, ideas or notes, but explicitly not as a personal cloud or media storage. The TOS Section 1: > Our service is open for all projects covered by a licence for free and open source software, free and open source hardware, or free cultural works as defined by § 2 (1) 1. So the "FUD" I am spreading is literally the headline of the legal terms of service. There is an organization behind the spread of this information, and it is Codeberg e.V.

cxr 11d ago
You have made two concrete claims about Codeberg that are verifiably untrue: "Codeberg does not permit personal repos" "A private git repo with my own code, is not permitted" Codeberg's policy explicitly permits personal repos, including private code repos. Both of your claims are false. There is no getting around this, no matter how much you try to move the goalposts or the other forms of conversational misdirection you're trying to pull off here.
deleted 10d ago
[deleted]
cxr 10d ago
You have made two concrete claims about Codeberg that are verifiably untrue: "Codeberg does not permit personal repos" "A private git repo with my own code, is not permitted" Codeberg's policy explicitly permits personal repos, including private code repos. Both of your claims are false. There is no getting around this, no matter how much you try to move the goalposts or the other forms of conversational misdirection you're trying to pull off here.

deleted 11d ago

[deleted]