cududa

7 ms·

1.
by cududa 4d ago
Yep. It occurred to me a few days ago that the OAI TOS only says “Input” as what you provide “Output” as what you receive, Input and Output collectively as “Content.” and they won't "train" on your content. But they can retai
2.
by cududa 4d ago
The open models let you see there thinking and the models seem to be succinctly/ compactly representing the actual underlying concepts they're working on in some symbolic way or another. But they definitely represent the meat, bon
3.
by cududa 5d ago
Kind of shocked nobody is calling out at the flag at the bottom of the announcement saying that it's not eligible for Zero Data Retention and it's currently pretty nebulous what the "Don't train on my conversations"
4.
by cududa 9d ago
They likely train on logs.
5.
by cududa 28d ago
Oh it fucking loves its “product owner” bullshit. A .github/CODEOWNERS file seems to help when it’s going down that path, but I don’t like to indulge it..
6.
by cududa 1mo ago
I mean I still regularly use 5.3 spark (the cerebrus model) that comes with my sub to do rapid reviews of 5.6's work and it finds oodles of problems in about a minute.
7.
by cududa 1mo ago
I'd actually suggest a great starting point would be a local command reviewer LLM. Could ostensibly be a modern AV type thing. Particularly seeing this lately has driven the need home deeper to me: https://x.com/chris
8.
by cududa 1mo ago
Just a note that I think the direction most people are paying attention to is memory bandwidth; thats the real bottleneck and “number go up” but also constraint people are designing around
9.
by cududa 2mo ago
Please for the love of god don't tell me the Codex sandbox is their actual eval harness sandbox????? I maintain my own fork of Codex for "fun". Whenever I look at the sandboxing churn they're doing every release, as some
10.
by cududa 2mo ago
This is really cool! I’m becoming convinced the optimal UI to engage with agents, long term is going to be something spatial. No idea shape that even takes, though I really feel what you’ve made might be Xerox PARC days in terms of metapho
11.
by cududa 2mo ago
Right? I also quit Claude Code and switch to Codex over that. Now I’m trying to figure out how I could make an extra $65,000 to never have to be concerned about this nonsense again. I know the economics of using open router etc… But I’m rem
12.
by cududa 3mo ago
Embedded devices absolutely need DDR3 and DDR4
13.
by cududa 3mo ago
I mean it’d take minutes of research to realize people are successfully and efficiently running 4-bit quantized GLM 5.2 on MacStudio 512GB M3 Ultras at over 60 tok/s. K2 2.7 is quite literally designed for 4 bit quantization and runs e
14.
by cududa 3mo ago
Ah yes but you can shunt the costs of that off into a public works/ taxpayer funded infrastructure project
15.
by cududa 3mo ago
How do you figure that? “also a reminder that as soon as Chinese models take the lead, they will switch to closed source too” What specifically about their release strategy “reminded” you of that conjecture? The premise that they only open
16.
by cududa 3mo ago
I’ve been exceptionally displeased with Claude Code since end of February and switched completely to Codex in April. The blasé way in which one person (Borris) capriciously changes the system prompt multiple times a day, also no longer writ
17.
by cududa 4mo ago
It doesn’t matter if people have to suddenly live by gas turbines that run 24/7 because why again? Can you repeat that last part back to me but say it a little dumber for me?
18.
by cududa 5mo ago
This might be the best color palette generator I’ve ever seen. I used to work in Operating Systems, and trying to get a good color palette from a photo is HARD. A lot of very smart very well paid people have dedicated years of their life to
19.
by cududa 5mo ago
I see a deep tree and a shallow tree in the two screenshots, representative of entirely different approaches.
20.
by cududa 5mo ago
You’ve never used the API version versus the $200 plan and set the two at the exact same task, have you?
21.
by cududa 5mo ago
Huh, seriously? Have you ever worked in an office? Perhaps your mental picture of what op is describing might be misaligned? I just always assumed it was a rarer/ more disciplined style some people had
22.
by cududa 5mo ago
“Well, did it work for those people?” “No, it never does. I mean, these people somehow delude themselves into thinking it might, but…… …But it might work for us!”
23.
by cududa 5mo ago
Remember when they shipped that version that didn't actually start/ run? At work we were goofing on them a bit, until I said "Wait how did their tests even run on that?" And we realized whatever their CI/CD process
24.
by cududa 5mo ago
That guy has his own form of AI psychosis
25.
by cududa 6mo ago
When you say it’s not a massive codebase, I’m curious, what are you comparing it to?
26.
by cududa 7mo ago
Good. It’s always insane to me that they get 1% of the iPhone CPU cost of ~$68 or something there around. There was a lawsuit in 2020 or 2021 where some evidence was unsealed showing ARM gets 1% of the CPU cost. I can’t recall how that CPU
27.
by cududa 7mo ago
Sure but that doesn't mean it'll perfectly retrieve information it's trained on. There's a lot of conflicting sources, hallucinations, etc.
28.
by cududa 8mo ago
Fantasy price for your personal usage or the personal usage of most average consumers/ software engineers, sure. It bears repeating: you're not the target audience. They've been in the display game a long time. For people tha
29.
by cududa 8mo ago
Thanks for sharing. Very … interesting. Just trying to understand why the heck would React be the best tool here?
30.
by cududa 8mo ago
I just get all excited whenever anyone brings these books up, remembering the first time I read them.

More ›