Yep. It occurred to me a few days ago that the OAI TOS only says “Input” as what you provide “Output” as what you receive, Input and Output collectively as “Con

Yep. It occurred to me a few days ago that the OAI TOS only says “Input” as what you provide “Output” as what you receive, Input and Output collectively as “Content.” and they won't "train" on your content. But they can retain content for safety evaluations and debugging. What's neat about "safety evaluations" in LLM parlance is apparently encountering any novel information constitutes a "safety event" that can result in new reinforcement learning data... This anthropic 2022 paper that basically describes how it's a perpetual information siphoning machine with a cute little graphic https://arxiv.org/html/2212.08073 https://arxiv.org/html/2212.08073 - they publish their "constitution". OpenAI has a "model spec" they somewhat regularly update that I suspect is their equivalent process. I suspect we've all been unwittingly advancing their models capabilities.. This Dec 2025 Google paper "A Practical Guide to Generating Synthetic Data With Differential Privacy" spells it out pretty clearly - the focus is on "privacy" - nothing about protecting the user's IP or unique knowledge/ insights.. https://arxiv.org/html/2512.03238v1 https://arxiv.org/html/2512.03238v1 In OpenAI's case it seems to essentially generating synthetic training tuples from {prompt, chain-of-thought, answer} or scores on the chain of thought for reinforcement learning. It would appear opting out of "Improve the model for everyone" didn't actually mean what we thought it meant.