cbdc_watcher

5 ms·

1.
by cbdc_watcher 4y ago
The whole rat-in-a-maze interview vibe is creepy and suppressive of true intellect. Solving a maze that the candidate had not studied recently is going to be a trial and error situation unless one gets very lucky with their first try. And i
2.
by cbdc_watcher 4y ago
I heard that raw foods contain the very enzymes that our body uses to digest them. Like how an apple decays on its own over time. Those enzymes get destroyed during cooking so your body has to use its existing enzymes. Not sure if this is a
3.
by cbdc_watcher 4y ago
That's funny. If I had a bigger brain I too would munch on fruit instead of leafs. I think they have it backward causation wise.
4.
by cbdc_watcher 4y ago
Excellent deducktion
5.
by cbdc_watcher 4y ago
you're saying it was sent to the regulators but it was written as a blog post for popular consumption. I'm countering by saying that whether the regulators are communicated with using a dry, austere style or a theatrical one fit f
6.
by cbdc_watcher 4y ago
<< Waiting is toxic. >> That's a disgusting and idiotic assertion.
7.
by cbdc_watcher 4y ago
Maybe some gov agencies have the kind of culture that is biased toward a dry and austere communication style such as that typically found in papers coming out of regulatory agencies (and ones presented to them), but I assure you it is not a
8.
by cbdc_watcher 4y ago
Why should the style matter more than the content. If our gov agencies are as sensitive to style of communication as you suggest then I would say they are wasting our tax dollars with their extreme focus on aesthetics and spurious semantics