capo

6 ms·

1.
by capo 13y ago
The feature is no longer available by client, it's available via web: https://mail.google.com/mail/#chats http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2013/05/new-interface-for-g...
2.
by capo 13y ago
I've addressed the "facts".
3.
by capo 13y ago
I think I've attacked both.
4.
by capo 13y ago
http://readwrite.com/2013/05/09/microsoft-youtube-app-rule-b... They built an unauthorized app and now they are complaining that the app is unauthorized.
5.
by capo 13y ago
There is no "discussion" going on, you are just repeating fact-free Microsoft press statements. If you're not getting paid you should be.
6.
by capo 13y ago
Nope. You just joined to ask me that?
7.
by capo 13y ago
You don't think it's relevant? Microsoft is paying millions to run anti-Google attack ads and smear campaigns everywhere, it's not unthinkable that they would hire astroturf to roam sites like HN, so for the sake of the health of this commu
8.
by capo 13y ago
GTalk is still as is. As for YouTube it is and always have been available on the web for windows phone. Microsoft in clear violation of Google's TOS used undocumented APIs and stripped ads from YouTube and now they have the audacity to say
9.
by capo 13y ago
It's probably due to the new Hangouts history search feature touted today.
10.
by capo 13y ago
Same as every other “cloud provider”, yet somehow Google is the one subjected to these overwritten accounts and the almost mandatory pseudo law/policy musings that follow. You might want to take a look at some policies from others in the in
11.
by capo 13y ago
I was honestly just trying to help. I tested the only way I know how, via my own Gmail account.
12.
by capo 13y ago
It does not do that, I just double checked, even when the focus is on the "Send" button a dialog box pops with "Send (Ctrl-Enter)" and no sending happens. Maybe what you encountered was the work of a browser extension or a labs feature left
13.
by capo 13y ago
You shouldn't throw stones, one clould as easily accuse you of shilling: https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=ecopoesis
14.
by capo 13y ago
So HN has to be the consumer service?! that's not what this place is about.
15.
Show HN: The day SEO types and babbling idiots took over HN
1 points by capo 13y ago|0 comments
16.
by capo 13y ago
Why is this sort of post even on HN, not to mention the front page? and why is this thread dominated by idiotic language about "evil" and "kings" and incoherent babbling about politics and democratic representation?! and suddenly everyone i
17.
by capo 14y ago
I doubt anything will change your opinions about Google: https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=anon1385 https://news.ycombinator.com/submitted?id=anon1385 Carry on, I guess.
18.
by capo 14y ago
Careful, you might mistakenly be accused of being an "astroturfer": https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=andyl
19.
by capo 14y ago
Google's blogpost about vendor compatability: http://officialandroid.blogspot.com/2012/09/the-benefits-imp...
20.
by capo 14y ago
Yeah, no shit! I’m not quite sure what is the point of that article, because it’s fairly obvious that the main reason for which Plus was conceived is to be the uniform identity provider for commenting, reviewing, and overall communicating
21.
by capo 14y ago
mailto:security@google.com
22.
by capo 14y ago
"Filtering spam for us and showing ads for them" doesn't quite sum all the benefits of a parse-able inbox, what about when Google Now notifies you about flight and delivery updates by scanning your inbox, and stuff like this: https://www.g
23.
by capo 14y ago
OP ought to restore the original title because it better represents the content of that study seeing as it's clearly about the mechanism for verifying side-loaded apps (introduced in 4.2) and not the Play store bouncer.
24.
by capo 14y ago
So it's being dealt with then. Not sure when wording an attention seeking post and submitting it to HN became standard operating procedure in these situations. Patience remains a virtue when this stuff happens.
25.
by capo 14y ago
Yeah that's what I mean by the "free tier".
26.
by capo 14y ago
That's a bit of an overreaction. Unless I'm reading the post incorrectly there aren't any bad news in it really: existing accounts stay free, now you have two tiers, paid and free, and with the paid you get real support for the money (and c
27.
by capo 14y ago
My guess is that after it's rolled fully they will log interactions and iterate accordingly. And I'm sure they care about the health of their ecosystem at least as much as you do. Remember that creating a Google account now also creates a G
28.
by capo 14y ago
It’s kinda silly asking them not to use their identity system that was meant precisely for this sort of thing. A user doesn't have to “use” g+ to have a g+ account, and the review process is straightforward when you already have a profile s
29.
by capo 14y ago
If the update hasn't propagated your way still and you're getting an error try deleting it then reinstall using this link: https://itunes.apple.com/app/gmail/id422689480?mt=8
30.
by capo 14y ago
To recap: In order to receive support from a human being for Google Apps the account holder needs her account associated PIN, but since this guy was locked out of his account he didn't have it available to take advantage of the phone suppor

More ›