Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
binaryanomaly
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
31.
▲
Google One
(one.google.com)
246 points
by
binaryanomaly
8y ago
|
368 comments
32.
▲
Hadoop Needs to Be a Business, Not Just a Platform
(nextplatform.com)
5 points
by
binaryanomaly
8y ago
|
0 comments
33.
▲
This is ‘iPhone XS’
(9to5mac.com)
15 points
by
binaryanomaly
8y ago
|
13 comments
34.
▲
Firefox Pioneer
(support.mozilla.org)
112 points
by
binaryanomaly
8y ago
|
55 comments
35.
▲
by
binaryanomaly
8y ago
I am using it as 2nd device when doing linux stuff. I would have preferred to be able to use it as the one and only main device.
36.
▲
by
binaryanomaly
8y ago
I have a librem 13v2, too. While I like it from an idealistic point of view - in terms of hardware build quality the current generation does just not get anywhere near a macbook pro. Maybe the next generation can close this gap further. As
37.
▲
Firefox (60) Quantum: Fast for Business, Better for IT
(blog.mozilla.org)
3 points
by
binaryanomaly
8y ago
|
0 comments
38.
▲
Firefox 60
(ftp.mozilla.org)
1 points
by
binaryanomaly
8y ago
|
0 comments
39.
▲
by
binaryanomaly
8y ago
I fortunately do not have that problem, yet. But the autopilot stuff and other weird stuff bitdefender is doing autonomously is exactly why i may ditch it soon. Will probably switch to sophos once it happens.
40.
▲
by
binaryanomaly
8y ago
Seems you're right. I didn't pay a lot of attention to it tbh ;)
41.
▲
by
binaryanomaly
8y ago
BitDefender is quite a pain if it ever gets in your way. They really did a bad job there wouldn't buy it again.
42.
▲
by
binaryanomaly
8y ago
Have one but never needed it so far - or it didn't catch the virii ;) I use bitdefender at least it's quite unobtrusive on mac (sick of the windows version!). Sophos is free and afaik not too bad if you need one: https:/
43.
▲
Nitrokey Partners with the Linux Foundation
(nitrokey.com)
1 points
by
binaryanomaly
8y ago
|
0 comments
44.
▲
by
binaryanomaly
8y ago
I second that, really a good, to recommend course that gives you insights how our brains work and learn. Although a bit lengthy for my taste.
45.
▲
by
binaryanomaly
8y ago
Nice! I like it and see potential. Was quite disappointed of all the OSX file managers so far and I think I've tried them all. After staying for a bit with pathfinder I'm back to finder. While not super decent it still doesn'
46.
▲
by
binaryanomaly
8y ago
FYI - Spotify does have a Linux client and it's quite decent https://www.spotify.com/ch-de/download/linux/ Otherwise I agree. Depending on your needs linux is not on par with Windows/MacOS yet, espe
47.
▲
by
binaryanomaly
8y ago
The client did not convince me compared to 1Password. And then you either use their cloud or need to host a .net container yourself - which was a no go for me. Then I can also stay with 1PW. But a matter of taste of course in the end...
48.
▲
by
binaryanomaly
8y ago
Thanks, I've already considered switching to Pass once but don't remember what stopped me. May reconsider it again when I have time during my holidays.
49.
▲
by
binaryanomaly
8y ago
Very pleasant and refreshing to see some activity on the OSS front here. I believe Mozilla would have the resources to bring this to a success. Although naivety aside - I think it'll take years to only slightly catch up with the comfor
50.
▲
UMatrix: Point and click matrix to filter net requests
(github.com)
1 points
by
binaryanomaly
9y ago
|
0 comments
51.
▲
by
binaryanomaly
9y ago
Coming soon. Well the end it's only email. You decide whom to trust with. Personally, I feel better with Protonmail. It's not better nor cheaper than gsuite it just has a totally different proposition as a product.
52.
▲
by
binaryanomaly
9y ago
Bridge is out of beta: https://protonmail.com/bridge/ and yes for paying customers. Given they don't sell your data it's natural that advanced features have a price. Yes there is of course trust involved as w
53.
▲
by
binaryanomaly
9y ago
Protonmail is certainly one of the more secure mail solutions since it's e2e encrypted not just at rest. On the other hand it doesn't support U2F yet which doesn't bring it to the top in terms of security. Regarding privacy I
54.
▲
Startups will be everywhere – Interview with Naval Ravikant
(medium.com)
1 points
by
binaryanomaly
9y ago
|
0 comments
55.
▲
by
binaryanomaly
9y ago
I am in exact this situation as well and I did give notice. Thought we have left this era behind years ago, seems I was wrong.
56.
▲
by
binaryanomaly
9y ago
Respect!
57.
▲
by
binaryanomaly
9y ago
Very fair and progressive strategy. This is the future imho. If you want good / the best, pay them accordingly, no matter where they live - because someone else might do it and pocket your talent.
58.
▲
by
binaryanomaly
9y ago
While the vault backend is certainly too powerful I could also imagine this as a solution for private/family use. Having broad UI and plugin support with good usability will likely be the key to success.
59.
▲
by
binaryanomaly
9y ago
Correct but then it's nothing official yet with an uncertain future? Even if it would become community backed it still is a backend that needs to be secured, maintained, updated, etc. Therefore a file only based solution is imho prefer
60.
▲
by
binaryanomaly
9y ago
I wished bitwarden would not need a backend and for sure not one tied to the windows and .net ecosystem. I would be willing to pay (even subscription) for a nice set of UI clients (android, iOs, mac, Linux, Windows), plugins (Chrome, Firefo
More ›