ausudhz

5 ms·

1.
by ausudhz 3y ago
I don't think this is totally true. The selling point of the cloud it's not only what you mentioned, maybe yes at the beginning. Today, is more important the time to market. You can use existing services to build your application,
2.
by ausudhz 3y ago
"trending" suse and red hat have been doing it for decades. Canonical too, among many others
3.
by ausudhz 3y ago
It's not my ideology! It was an example just chill down instead of implying things that I never said
4.
by ausudhz 3y ago
it doesn't matter if I've experienced it or not. My comment it's not a praise to communism, perhaps just read it again (and read the context from which it started too)
5.
by ausudhz 3y ago
that doesn't make it less demonized. Unless you forgot the media campaigns on it and the plenty of wars that started in the attempt to stop the spread of communism.
6.
by ausudhz 3y ago
Yes I'm taking about that, you're the only one that understands it apparently. The thing is that my comment couldn't be anyhow related to today's situation (I've used the past tense) since communist doesn't exi
7.
by ausudhz 3y ago
the only fool here is you that don't understand the meaning of the comment I've made. Nowhere in my comment I said that communism is good
8.
by ausudhz 3y ago
I don't understand why people get so emotional when you mention the word communism It was a simple comparison point on the previous comment that, by my standard was also wildly off base (given that he said dumb to a whole country basic
9.
by ausudhz 3y ago
> No, because the government doesn't need to demonize communism to make it sound dumb true, because the citizens of these countries are already uninformed enough about communism that they are indeed the one that make it sound dumb
10.
by ausudhz 3y ago
> However wars should never been seen in a totally negative light Ya of course! War is great, it pushed also industrial output and plenty of investments in researches. Plus it gets rid of the weak too! (This paragraph is sarcastic, I&#x2
11.
by ausudhz 3y ago
somewhat similar to the demonization of communism that the west pushed for decades? Apparently there are many people that are more incline to just smile and nod rather than arguing. Probably the geographical location of these is not really
12.
by ausudhz 3y ago
> do you contend that the monarchs suddenly got uglier Yes, because for centuries they were having children with their relatives. If you studied basic biology you would know that by doing that the gene pool become too small and many phys
13.
by ausudhz 3y ago
> Am an artist You're one, you're not "all artists" > And in general, artists of yesteryear were either already rich Very much a false statement, I can make a never ending list of artists that were born, lived and
14.
by ausudhz 3y ago
maybe because the monarchs were quite ugly. If you're an artist you are more interested in beauty than money (and I don't mean necessarily physical appearance)
15.
by ausudhz 3y ago
maybe they meant decentralized baseball cards
16.
by ausudhz 3y ago
Most of them, just depends what you want to do.
17.
by ausudhz 3y ago
not bad for doing few meetings a year
18.
by ausudhz 3y ago
There's a value for unsupervised LLMs that you like or not.
19.
by ausudhz 3y ago
as cheap as deep water expeditions. If you're willing to take the risk of having private actors cut corners.
20.
by ausudhz 3y ago
Programming gets "easier" because there's more to do. You need a scalable way to write software quicker because there are many more use cases that 20 years ago nobody though of. You don't want spend anymore 6 month to wr
21.
by ausudhz 3y ago
It's what happens when there are more people on the business of talking than doing I'm waiting for new courses and ebook on how to become a gpt expert.
22.
by ausudhz 3y ago
It's also due to cost. At scale is cheaper to produce your own professors than buy it from a vendor. Not to mention performance and energy consumption benefits. The phone had it to begin with due to the low consumption and easy instruc
23.
by ausudhz 3y ago
Use the APIs
24.
by ausudhz 3y ago
"too big to fail"
25.
by ausudhz 4y ago
Same here pretty weird
26.
by ausudhz 4y ago
I've seen Haskell being used commercially plenty of time. So rust and go
27.
by ausudhz 4y ago
It's say "it's not metabolic but metabolism can influence" then it's say "it's not genetic but genes can influence" Depends on your interpretation it can be both yes or both no. In any case, that&#x27
28.
by ausudhz 4y ago
Look at the bright side, ChatGPT does the same. I don't think we've a clarity as humans whether cancer is a genetic or metabolic disease how do you think an AI, that's generated based on human knowledge, could possibly be bet
29.
by ausudhz 4y ago
Agree also because OpenAI misses a crucial point. How to reward content creators? At least Google can pivot a new version of adsense easily with this products. Technology!=business viability That's what many first mover don't thin
30.
by ausudhz 4y ago
That's because they must be open source, what other sense of accountability could you possibly give if you're asking money to a crowd upfront based on a piece of paper?

More ›