asdfsa32

6 ms·

31.
by asdfsa32 24d ago
Only if it wants to allow Writable Memory to become Executable, or basically, allow JIT.
32.
by asdfsa32 24d ago
Anyone who thinks AI is good with writing code that is hard to write for the operator, not due to lack of basic software engineering know how but complexity of the domain, either has access to models beyond what is available to the public o
33.
by asdfsa32 24d ago
Sure, but it still means that the OS has to decide who is allowed to do it and to what extent. Sophisticated worms like Stuxnet would be much harder with strict W^X for example, since CVE-2010-2568 and the like would be much harder to execu
34.
by asdfsa32 24d ago
But this means that you have to decide who is allowed to switch.
35.
by asdfsa32 24d ago
The issue is that it restricts from locking-down and securing the system with Write xor Execute memory. So it has system wide implication. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W%5EX
36.
by asdfsa32 24d ago
You're entirely correct because JIT requires violating Write xor Execute security policy. This is the reason on iOS, it is limited to Apple shipped software. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W%5EX
37.
by asdfsa32 26d ago
Op is making a claim about being a software engineer without having the necessary baseline of skills discussed. I have proposed two possible reasons, self-thought programmer who didn't get to the bottom of things, or just went through
38.
by asdfsa32 26d ago
Roads do not result in random deaths, drivers, and to a much lesser extent poorly maintained cars do. I know it might sound like a distinction without difference, but when it comes to safety measures, this distinction does matter. Roads tha
39.
by asdfsa32 26d ago
flash vs fine details. Pick one.
40.
by asdfsa32 26d ago
I am well aware of the Statistical Value of Life and how it impacts projects. But that is generally used for allocating preventative measures. No road is going to get approved if it is going to result in random deaths by design.
41.
by asdfsa32 26d ago
Your point is understood but the crux of the issue is a bit similar to capital punishment, the argument is that risk of losing even one innocent person or useful book isn't worth taking; specially considering the value created for soci
42.
by asdfsa32 26d ago
Thinking more, the object of the "house" is to extract value, whatever it is by rent or letting them burn it down, as long as the correct dues are paid, the mission is accomplished.
43.
by asdfsa32 27d ago
If you can sell them fuel, it might be a lucrative business.
44.
by asdfsa32 27d ago
Most people are lazy, so it is designed for most, including myself.
45.
by asdfsa32 27d ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anecdotal_evidence
46.
by asdfsa32 27d ago
You may be confusing articulate and confident with useful and accurate.
47.
by asdfsa32 27d ago
Skimming/scanning. For a couple of items, it is not an issue, but say for a long list of FAQ, being able to scroll past fast is nice.
48.
by asdfsa32 27d ago
Can we start having a label for aislop content? Maybe it is useful, but I am not reading it. I could barely read 2-3 lines before I closed the tab. Next.
49.
by asdfsa32 27d ago
You can blame the governments for all sort of inefficiencies but any operation that impacts taxes runs a tight ship in most developed nations, this include things like copyright law, census, and anything statistics. If companies get slope w
50.
by asdfsa32 27d ago
Everything is fine for a standard low enough. This is the crux of the issue with LLM work, it is poor quality and shifts the burden of mental work to the consumer rather than the producer, while the producer attempts to extract credit for t
51.
by asdfsa32 27d ago
Saying that "a software engineer requires a baseline of understanding of software engineering" is substantive and anything short of that is not "thoughtful" or "kind" but rather disingenuous and sycophantic. Pr
52.
by asdfsa32 27d ago
It is of little interest to me since Solaar does all I need, but should I need to, I will dig right into. Nothing to sweat about.
53.
by asdfsa32 27d ago
Yes, that is the problem, as the titles says "Google has stopped pushing Git tags". No git tags, no cryptographic content hash.
54.
by asdfsa32 27d ago
The problem isn't that you should know everything, but that you should know how to dig into these things. The op isn't even talking about HID and input subsystem, they're talking about replacing a goddamn binary in a package.
55.
by asdfsa32 27d ago
I don't think pandering to the ideas that basically amount to "a 6 week bootcamp makes you a Software Engineer" is honest or useful. It is sycophancy and disingenuous. If someone doesn't even know where to start looking
56.
by asdfsa32 27d ago
But do Iranians have a right for self-determination? How about Israelis?
57.
by asdfsa32 28d ago
A git hash is cryptographically secure. It doesn't matter how you distribute it. That is the entire point you're missing.
58.
by asdfsa32 28d ago
I have. Can you help me understand what is the issue with my comment? Can we not agree that not being able to know where to even start with studying and changing a binary is foundational to being a software engineer?
59.
by asdfsa32 28d ago
It is an easy to overlook this, but even for someone in position of power to change, creating different code with the same hash is borderline impossible.
60.
by asdfsa32 29d ago
Even Example 1 works in a much narrower scope, in that you need to have a decent working setup and all the rails like a good AGENTS file and so on. The point is that "Vibing" still does not produce worthy output.

More ›