asdfsa32

6 ms·

1.
by asdfsa32 5d ago
What is with the website though? Rubbish scrolling. Junky rendering with artifacts if you scroll fast.
2.
by asdfsa32 5d ago
You should use my model then, I spent about 30$ in electricity and used my existing RTX4090. It is not very good, but can you compare it with others really? You can use this service via a private API with a VPN, email me your credit card de
3.
by asdfsa32 6d ago
Okay, makes sense, the whole thing looks and screams vibe coded. On a beefy machine, navigating between your website pages takes 2-3 seconds. So still a long way to go with AI.
4.
by asdfsa32 6d ago
> Are there cybersecurity concerns in the frontend? I would have thought you have to assume the client is untrusted and only do security work on the backend. I hate software engineering now.
5.
by asdfsa32 6d ago
This is the most naive take on security ever. For the backend, you assume your client is compromised, but you still don't want to allow your client to be compromised.
6.
by asdfsa32 6d ago
I am using Gemini as well as Opus on a somewhat small project in React Native and I can not imagine this thing being able to build the whole thing on its own without it being a dumbpster fire. Can you share some details of how you work? Wha
7.
by asdfsa32 6d ago
I was surprised by your comments and then you do Rust to be called via Java or Kotlin and Swift? What does your app do?
8.
by asdfsa32 6d ago
Codex with what model?
9.
by asdfsa32 8d ago
Everything is a preference. You should stop thinking!
10.
by asdfsa32 8d ago
> Really cool house, but describing the cabinets as "bunch of wood, cut into fairly large pieces. Maybe a few screws and hinges" shows little understanding of what goes into building something like that. I mean, the whole place
11.
by asdfsa32 8d ago
Did you look through the accomplishments? I don't mean to be crass but I like a bit of weight for "accomplished". I mean, the American Express office looks like a track stop or mall you will find along the highway.
12.
by asdfsa32 8d ago
The will to do and the power to do does not mean well to do.
13.
by asdfsa32 9d ago
Let them do it. It will end up really well. I know the system has been protecting these companies, but that has been an economic concern as much as other motives. Now that AI is the crown jewel of economy and global dominance, let the enter
14.
by asdfsa32 10d ago
Without being able to see the prompts, it is hard to make any assertions about honesty, we all know OpenAI is in trouble because they're showing ads already. And that is something that Sam has clearly marked as time of trouble for them
15.
by asdfsa32 10d ago
This is a PR puff piece.
16.
by asdfsa32 12d ago
This is why new gTLDs are insane and stupid. It is about time there is some _yours for life_ DNS system. In this age, allowing domain names to be owned by other entities is almost like allowing a company business registration number or one&
17.
by asdfsa32 15d ago
> the models writing more for themselves and each other than for humans What does this means?
18.
by asdfsa32 17d ago
Have you looked at the project for which htmx4 is released for? it is basically mvc + toolbelt + network library and all that jazz like it is 2012.
19.
by asdfsa32 17d ago
Not react yet, but it is approaching the early 2010 jQuery and Backbone vibes, so give it another 5 years and it will converge to React.
20.
by asdfsa32 18d ago
And by the looks of it, the Author is starting to understand the reason React and the likes exists and has start to build them over again: https://fixiproject.org/ LOL. Frontend dev never changes.
21.
by asdfsa32 21d ago
The page lists a long list of defences.
22.
by asdfsa32 21d ago
Okay, I misunderstood your point. What you're saying seems pretty reasonable to me.
23.
by asdfsa32 24d ago
This looks like an ad for a bunch of products as "hackable". The Authors only other blog post is also about using Claude for similar ideas, without actually showing the end product from a kick skim. Anthropic has been run "Us
24.
by asdfsa32 24d ago
> wthout a JIT, applications can still have arbitrary execution vulnerabilities. Only on operating systems that allow dynamic executable code.
25.
by asdfsa32 24d ago
The entire argument is one of Relativism, there is a whole lot of disciplines where there is a huge subjective element, consider journalism and literature in general, but that doesn't mean we can not have a conversation about quality o
26.
by asdfsa32 24d ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relativist_fallacy
27.
by asdfsa32 24d ago
You're making the assumption that "responsible" is something provable, but that is not the case, it is specially not easy to prove software is secure from tampering its behaviour.
28.
by asdfsa32 24d ago
You can't make assertions about "quality" of code that was generated under an hour while it would have taken a human 40 hours, unless you put substantial amount of work into reviewing it. I used Fable on a Zephyr project with
29.
by asdfsa32 24d ago
Fair, but I fear that now even more people who can't code will code, and code that is not any better than what people who could barely code write. Growing cabbages starting to look more and more interesting.
30.
by asdfsa32 24d ago
Yes, but with JIT, you can't really verify what the application does upfront. That is the entire point.

More ›