arowthway

5 ms·

1.
by arowthway 3mo ago
I dont understand the downvotes here, is my analogy wrong? Why?
2.
by arowthway 3mo ago
It could be malicious, but I imagined it's some third world wanabe hacker/researcher, who doesn't know any better, operating at the edge of his abilities.
3.
by arowthway 3mo ago
Without PR merged it's just a stupid machine larping, it could say "I will rape and eat your kids" and it would be just as relevant.
4.
by arowthway 3mo ago
Of course I meant malicious towards the person paying the bill, not towards the agent.
5.
by arowthway 3mo ago
Suppose a drunk man on the street is acting aggressively towards you and four of your friends, but you can push him out of the way and continue walking. Should you knock his teeth out? Actually I don't know, maybe you should inflict so
6.
by arowthway 3mo ago
The agent would probably have wasted a similar amount of money just waiting for PR to be merged regardless of these people's actions, and I understand having some fun at the expense of the noob outsider. But "silent consensus was
7.
by arowthway 3mo ago
There's no such thing as a human without access to the physical world.
8.
by arowthway 3mo ago
Opt-in = action is required to opt in = off by default.
9.
by arowthway 3mo ago
'Then you ask them for a site that doesn't work' - For me it was Youtube. Debian 13, Gnome, apt update && apt install firefox, try playing a video. It's always noticebly slower, and last time it didn't even
10.
by arowthway 3mo ago
I don't think there is any "humans are metaphysically superior to LLMs" subtext to this talk, it's just a technical/educational observation. Access to some forms of evaluation and selective retention is inherent to
11.
by arowthway 3mo ago
Looks like the output of Caddy Defender plugin: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/JasonLovesDoggo/caddy-defe...
12.
by arowthway 3mo ago
I love evolutionary psychology trivia but for me it's kind of hard to meaningfully fit 0.13 standard deviation shift in preferences into my world model.
13.
by arowthway 3mo ago
Well, they share the same core componnent of disregard for property rights and freedom of contract.
14.
by arowthway 4mo ago
For the confused: gelateria is some foreign word for an ice cream shop.
15.
by arowthway 4mo ago
We should have listened to Rachel! >I've been aware of the ACME protocol for a while. I have tech notes going back as far as 2018, and every time I looked at it, I recoiled in horror. The whole thing amounts to "throw in every
16.
by arowthway 4mo ago
God, I love being boring, cis and not that smart.
17.
by arowthway 4mo ago
Also, there's nothing inherently insecure about feeding secrets to an LLM, it's only one element of the lethal trifecta.
18.
by arowthway 4mo ago
I think you're right, more evidence: "11. s From the Anthropic Team", "Boris’s single most-repeated ."
19.
by arowthway 4mo ago
Well, what if we take the rule book learned by the embodied chinese room robot and put it in the new chinese room? What if we come up with identical rules randomly or by top-down deduction?
20.
by arowthway 4mo ago
I know calling anti-AI people luddites was considered a shallow strawman in 2024 but now I can't help but feel this position of "we should maybe slow down the developement and adoption of new tech to protect jobs / social ord
21.
by arowthway 4mo ago
Cool. What are the hardware requirements? I use https://github.com/calzoneman/sync with mp4 files served by nginx and it works great for 15-20 people watching on a cheap 0.5GB ram 1 vcpu vps.
22.
by arowthway 4mo ago
Why is this example non-encyclopedic? It's an informative, falsifiable statement that could be supported by a citation, like here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thongbu_Wainucha#:~:text=remem...
23.
by arowthway 5mo ago
To me as someone also "deeply afraid of irritating someone or being in awkward situations", it sounds like this project is greatly expanding the surface on which awkward situations can happen? How do you decide if you should wave
24.
by arowthway 5mo ago
Start by repeatedly occupying the same room and seeing if the other person doesn't leave. Then you can graduate to very brief eye contact. Then maybe 'hi' to the whole room and seeing if the person responds. Longer eye contac
25.
by arowthway 5mo ago
Someone pulling up a smartphone on me would feel hostile because it's violating a social contract. Maybe I'd feel betrayed and attacked if it turned out someone was recording me using glasses, but I don't know, I don't c
26.
by arowthway 5mo ago
I admit it's hard to care for what you people can't even articulate
27.
by arowthway 5mo ago
Because person wearing glasses usually can move and video surveillance cameras usually can't? If that's not it then spell it out for me, please. Also, why would i be deceptive in this discussion? I feel like I missed some ideologi
28.
by arowthway 5mo ago
Also make sure to avoid people with smartphones and places with video surveilence.
29.
by arowthway 5mo ago
'consequences for giving them to kids are severe and the room for meaningful profit is close to zero, same applies here.' I don't think it applies, the difference is that codes are digital and can be sold over the internet, a
30.
by arowthway 5mo ago
Is it even theoretically possible to have bearer anonymity and no reselling option at the same time?

More ›