argentinian

6 ms·

1.
by argentinian 4d ago
If programming was used to temporarily increase one's self esteem from it then it's not a problem with the IAs, but a psychological problem. The problem is valuing a human being because of what they produce and not recognizing i
2.
by argentinian 7d ago
Yes. Maybe their business model was never sustainable and now they are unfairly blaming IA as a scapegoat to justify layoffs.
3.
by argentinian 12d ago
If they produce pointless products then they will lose money.
4.
by argentinian 23d ago
Laws are voted by politicians. Do you mean that most EU politicians are puppets of EU corporations?
5.
by argentinian 1mo ago
With advanced AI real time translation I don't see any need for that.
6.
by argentinian 1mo ago
If every side effect of the redistribution measures is taken into account, or if only policies that were tested and proven to work well are applied. I think then that they could have good results. Consider that the URSS and Cuba were about
7.
by argentinian 1mo ago
I'm not against redistributing wealth. I'm sure that it is going to be obligatory with the jump off productivity that IA would allow, and I believe that some redistribution strategies are very good and that others aren't. Wha
8.
by argentinian 1mo ago
It's not trivially falsifiable, is a fact.
9.
by argentinian 1mo ago
No, if demand is 0 you wouldn't have a reason to run that.
10.
by argentinian 1mo ago
If demand decreases then that can cause energy to become cheaper.
11.
by argentinian 1mo ago
Consider human history. You will be able to see that the greatest acts of good and evil were not done by the ultra rich.
12.
by argentinian 1mo ago
> Corporate capture is why government can't function in this regard. Do you believe that the same government people that is influenced by lobbying is going to vote to close the ways in which corporations give them money to control t
13.
by argentinian 1mo ago
> They're the same thing That's you opinion and is not an absolute fact. At least you can see that it's debatable: https://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2015/03/19/poverty-... A
14.
by argentinian 2mo ago
Now they cause harm because there's people that may believe a fake video is real. But people is developing skepticism about what they see in videos and learning to think that they may be generated, before taking them as true. What kind
15.
by argentinian 2mo ago
If as you say, corruption requires inequality, and there are inequalities that cannot be leveled, like strength and intelligence, and power, then monetary equality won't stop corruption. In a hierarchical organization like a government
16.
by argentinian 2mo ago
Look at Ghandi. He was not a millionaire and did a lot of good. In the same way there are poor persons who cause a lot of suffering to others without being rich. As the number of poor persons is bigger than the number of rich people, the ac
17.
by argentinian 2mo ago
There will be less creators that earn a living by creating. But I believe there will be more art. E.g. after Michelangelo created his style, then IA can mimick it almost for free. Imagine people with great talent like him, expressing their
18.
by argentinian 2mo ago
A super AI that could exist in the future won't "destroy your writing voice"?
19.
by argentinian 2mo ago
With IA, creation is cheap. It's inevitable that automation would make some jobs disappear. There's no solution, less people will be able to earn a living for creating art, I think. What do you think about this?
20.
by argentinian 2mo ago
What's wrong with that? There's the low quality slop for the people who desire it, and then there's the high quality literature that's appreciated by people with good taste, and that cannot be easily produced
21.
by argentinian 2mo ago
LLMs don't impede human expression.
22.
by argentinian 2mo ago
You are ultimately stating that there's something unique about human minds that cannot be replicated by machines. It may be so, or not.
23.
by argentinian 2mo ago
you are not taking into account that creators can be funded in different ways. For example like in Patreon. You can give part of your money to fund a creator that wants to create in order to earn a living. I believe that is better when peop
24.
by argentinian 2mo ago
What does matter? That's completely subjective. If the intent of the author matters to you, then, to you, it does. There's not an abstract "not mattering of the intent of the author" independent of different people with
25.
by argentinian 2mo ago
As you say, that already occurs with human made commercial crap literature. A person directing an IA could also lead it to build a story that teaches values.
26.
by argentinian 2mo ago
Completely agree with Borges in that. When the author is an AI, there's no human author, the result is a mix of what information it was feed, how its algorithms work, and what does the person giving commands to the IA asks. There'
27.
by argentinian 2mo ago
I would argue that a story can mainly provide a connection with your own subjectivity. If it moves something in you, that's what mainly matters. If your goal by reading is too learn about the subjectivity of another real person, then y
28.
by argentinian 2mo ago
Then regulate cartelization. That's a government function, if it doesn't work don't blame capitalism, blame governments. Pretending to know better than other people what that other people should choose our want - and imposing
29.
by argentinian 2mo ago
Some people downvote you, but is not able to produce a meaningful response.
30.
by argentinian 2mo ago
The increase in prices is a signal to producers to increase production. Email eliminated a lot of post office and paper production jobs, does that also annoy you? Washing machines eliminating jobs about washing clothes by hand? If you lik

More ›