adyashakti

7 ms·

1.
Show HN: Viveka: filter LLM output against a Lean-verified Advaita Vedanta model(github.com)
7 points by adyashakti 4mo ago|0 comments
2.
by adyashakti 4mo ago
that’s why i turn them off
3.
by adyashakti 5mo ago
of course; consciousness is a biologically inherited trait. that inheritance can't cross the human-machine interface.
4.
by adyashakti 5mo ago
why? they can get away with it, and you can't.
5.
by adyashakti 6mo ago
it's Catch-22. the world is such a mess that if you're happy, you must be delusional.
6.
by adyashakti 7mo ago
the beach. mantras. tapasya.
7.
Advaita Inquiry Matrix (Aim): Structured Non-Dual Inquiry with AI
2 points by adyashakti 7mo ago|0 comments
8.
Advaita Inquiry Matrix (AIM): Structured Nondual Inquiry with Agentic AI(drive.google.com)
1 points by adyashakti 7mo ago|1 comments
9.
by adyashakti 7mo ago
I’m building an experiment called Advaita Inquiry Matrix (AIM). AIM is an AI-assisted system that models the pedagogical method of Advaita Vedānta. Not a “guru bot,” not mystical content generation or scriptural imitation — but a rule-gover
10.
by adyashakti 7mo ago
translation: "96% of people trying to replace workers with AI don't know how to prompt it effectively or supervise its output."
11.
by adyashakti 7mo ago
why would he give up on FSD? they're both impossible problems with today's tech. maybe it was deliberate overreach, maybe hubris; maybe some of both.
12.
by adyashakti 7mo ago
if you oppose anything, you're not a pacifist.
13.
by adyashakti 7mo ago
they will fail. why? same reason as every other attempt to examine consciousness ‘scientifically’: consciousness cannot be observed. “How can one know That by which everything is known? How can one know the Knower?” —- Bṛhadāraṇyakopaniṣad
14.
by adyashakti 8mo ago
hell, i got busted in 4th grade for using a slide rule to do boring math stuff.
15.
by adyashakti 8mo ago
what took them so long? i had a heart attack back in 1987, and the neurological and psychological symptoms preceding and accompanying were obvious.
16.
by adyashakti 8mo ago
right: "Understanding the biophysical basis of consciousness remains a substantial challenge" precisely because there is no such thing. according to the Upaniṣads, consciousness is the Absolute. "How can one know that by whic
17.
by adyashakti 8mo ago
what seems obvious from this and other articles these days is that western materialistic atheistic capitalist culture has lost its moral compass and has become utterly corrupt—and the disease begins at, and is spread by, the powerful.
18.
by adyashakti 8mo ago
i have already done all these
19.
by adyashakti 8mo ago
hard to tell whether this is factual or breathless marketing prose. in any case, my strategy is different: simplify my life until it fits effortlessly in my brain—no LLM required.
20.
by adyashakti 8mo ago
Self-realization
21.
by adyashakti 9mo ago
get a Mac.
22.
by adyashakti 9mo ago
both.
23.
by adyashakti 9mo ago
absolutely. no. way.
24.
by adyashakti 9mo ago
And now, Matthew Scherf has published "A Formal Specification of Advaita Vedānta in Classical High-Order Logic," and verified it in both Isabelle and Lean4. https://github.com/matthew-scherf/Advaita
25.
by adyashakti 10mo ago
then why are companies building these huge data centres? Why not invest in more advanced fabs?
26.
by adyashakti 11mo ago
he’s right.
27.
by adyashakti 11mo ago
i have been waiting for someone to do this. as a nontechnical Advaita practitioner it's a bit over my head logically or mathematically. could this also be made into a formal ontology, like a Protégé model or OWL/RDF file?
28.
by adyashakti 11mo ago
much less. maybe it can do rocket science, but it can't edit video transcriptions worth a darn. my paid subscription expires today, and i'm not renewing.
29.
by adyashakti 1y ago
maybe it can write code, but it still sucks at technical editing
30.
by adyashakti 1y ago
once i have determined the leading exponent in any field and understanding his views, i ask whether i know enough to determine whether the information is useful to my purpose. if so, i continue to go deeper; if not, i know enough.

More ›