account73466

5 ms·

1.
by account73466 7y ago
Oh fuck, I am banned here from getting points. Time to avoid selling my own profile to whoever sniff on HN users.
2.
by account73466 7y ago
by improving metrics over time see, e.g., https://gluebenchmark.com/leaderboard/
3.
by account73466 7y ago
"he was still in conflict with Emperor Napoleon, the French Republic’s king"
4.
by account73466 7y ago
Above, AlexCoventry mentioned a paper. If you would like to find more, go to Google Scholar and find all papers which cite that paper. This would be just a part of the whole story since bigger datasets and models are not in open. The progre
5.
by account73466 7y ago
Glad to find they used something from my research. Don't want to disclose more, was flagged too much.
6.
by account73466 7y ago
If you think A and I think B, I am allowed to say B without proving it to you. You can say that my claim is unsupported but by insulting me in a parallel thread you learn nothing. Be open-minded and assume that what you see in open is not e
7.
by account73466 7y ago
I guess you are not from the field. Edit: I was right, he is an engineer and not a researcher who is active in the field.
8.
by account73466 7y ago
This time it is different.^{tm} More seriously, we are almost about to i) Generate a good book using a short intro. ii) Generate a meaningful video using a few photos and a basic text scenario. Which makes us closer to generate movies on de
9.
by account73466 7y ago
Of course. Because my definition of rich/poor is w.r.t. people around and not some world's mean/median. Many people in first world nations cannot afford to have as much kids as even 40 years ago.
10.
by account73466 7y ago
Yeah, some rich people don't get why poor people want to have kids and pollute this planet (according to them). Fortune's list suggests that the median number of kids is 2-3.
11.
by account73466 7y ago
>> None of this is to say that weed can't be beneficial. There might be a non-trivial impact of weed on climate change if weed consumers produce less kids which according to UNESCO is the best way to reduce your carbon footprint.
12.
by account73466 7y ago
>> That assumes that the person doesn't change in the meantime. In the meantime of what? I didn't suggest any action but merely suggested that sometimes money could clarify whether you do something because you love it or&#x
13.
by account73466 7y ago
Yes, that is why I say "at least $1M".
14.
by account73466 7y ago
>> you're not going to have the same output than if you were living on the breadline That is what poor people are told to justify their struggle.
15.
by account73466 7y ago
I am a scientist and thousands of scientists and engineers use my work. Most great artists, musicians, writers, theorists, scientists, teachers, and inventors would not need to struggle as much if they would have some money to cover their
16.
by account73466 7y ago
Instead of being rude, you could try to formulate your point without attacking a straw man.
17.
Ryan's Note – Final Scene S03E08 – Halt and Catch Fire
2 points by account73466 7y ago|0 comments
18.
by account73466 7y ago
You review seems pretty accurate. Very rarely there is some lucrative incentive to join as an employee.
19.
by account73466 7y ago
I feel like it is hard for people to say what they truly love before they have at least $1M in their bank account. If you have FU money, your view on working at a FAANG vs building a startup can change. You will find it easier to know what
20.
by account73466 7y ago
It contributes as well.
21.
by account73466 7y ago
On HN people often do not reply on replies to their comments and it does not mean that they do agree. It seems like a rather nice thing which helps to avoid many ego-battles.
22.
by account73466 7y ago
Thanks for the links! I am aware of the Buffet's bets but I did have a feeling that some VCs can be quite profitable especially the ones which invest in future government contractors and/or future surveillance facilitators.
23.
by account73466 7y ago
I can imagine this to be true but do you have a source for that information?
24.
by account73466 7y ago
I am wondering how far the essay would go if it were not from PG.
25.
by account73466 7y ago
When your university is pretty small, it looks more like a faculty and it is somewhat more common for the latter to be professor-led.
26.
by account73466 7y ago
I guess that it is phrased that way in order to signal other non-government organizations that they should have a look and probably ban it as well.
27.
by account73466 7y ago
Not necessarily only US stocks but printed money have to go somewhere and they will be printed as the only pacific way to nullify previous debt.
28.
by account73466 7y ago
7-8% is not an arbitrary number and the reason why 1959-1989 is different is because the % of money printed was different in that period. Currently, we are doubling money supply every 10 years, therefore one should ok to expect 2x in stocks
29.
by account73466 7y ago
The most powerful agent is the one which manages to confiscate our only real asset - our time. Trump is pretty good at it with all the controversies he is generating. AI-assisted systems will be targeted at maximizing this interaction metri
30.
by account73466 7y ago
The main author has many papers in Physical Review but here it is just arXiv, which journal you are talking about?

More ›