aadvani

5 ms·

1.
by aadvani 5y ago
I remember reading studies of 30-36 lbs in a year, IF they maintain diet and exercise. I see this adherence as your competitive advantage.
2.
by aadvani 5y ago
A lot of docs I know are prescribing GLP1s already for weight loss, off label. When they get RCT data, get coverage, you guys will be way ahead. Congrats, amazing concept.
3.
by aadvani 5y ago
We’re building this for clinical papers! inpharmd.com We have 10k summarized so far
4.
by aadvani 6y ago
Yep we do! We started building custom but just went into app orchard
5.
by aadvani 6y ago
Yes, but most don’t seem to mind. There are so many other high ROI things for clinical pharmacists to do instead. Most want to round more or spend more time with patients instead .
6.
by aadvani 6y ago
Yes! I think every doc probably has a bit of PTSD from EMR rollouts, so probably much harder to find early adopters for any new tech .
7.
by aadvani 6y ago
Thank you :-) Now we must execute
8.
by aadvani 6y ago
The clinical pharmacist has so much to do, they’re like Swiss Army knives. Systems that take us on don’t fire anyone to do so; this just frees up their clinical folks to do more patient care duties. So, yes, we want to grow through them !
9.
by aadvani 6y ago
That’s great! This is the future. During vaccines, how have your pharmacists managed to do both? I’m sure it’s a lot on them
10.
by aadvani 6y ago
Yes! But shouldn’t it be central? There are hundreds of thousands of clinical pharmacists answering similar questions every day. To your point- everyone asks unique questions so still get unique answers that they can then combine with patie
11.
by aadvani 6y ago
Took me a sec too- just replace the www with https://
12.
by aadvani 6y ago
Clinical pharmacists at every hospital have been key. Many docs prefer to still rely on their clinical pharmacist, which is fine because they (the clinical pharmacists) end up relying on us. Over time, it’s become simpler for many docs to j
13.
by aadvani 6y ago
Excellent questions and thank you for the kind words :-) 1. We tested this with Pfizer last year and found there was an opportunity to supplement existing med info teams that do the same thing. But it’s tough to do two markets well at once,
14.
by aadvani 6y ago
Thank you! This is exactly the type of question we’re here for. You can create a free trial account here and ask your question, all in 30 sec: https://www.inpharmd.com/provider_signup/new Then if you like it, pester aw
15.
by aadvani 6y ago
Same problem, for sure, but we’re taking a different approach. A SAAS tool has a hard time with complex questions because healthcare data is messy and results will be imperfect. Therefore we feel strongly about building a human - lead serv
16.
by aadvani 6y ago
Yep, totally. But they have X credible authors so can only have X credible info on their site. This means they focus on the most common questions. Public data/ our data shows point of care references like UTD can only answer ~1/2
17.
by aadvani 6y ago
Great info, and a shame there’s not better real world evidence for cases like this. And I hear you, just making the point that most shouldn't be considered “typical”; we should question everything.
18.
by aadvani 6y ago
This makes our day :-) Academic MCs are our main target right now. Thank you!
19.
by aadvani 6y ago
This is gold, thank you. He went after the same problem, yes, but with a traditional SAAS approach. We feel strongly that the only way to make this work is to have humans on our back end, thoughtfully automated with tech (vs the other way a
20.
by aadvani 6y ago
Despite their best efforts, up to date can never truly be up to date, can they? No shade, we love up to date; we just see ourselves as a complement.
21.
by aadvani 6y ago
My bad, typo- meant 6mg here For anyone curious , we actually did this question: https://www.inpharmd.com/is-there-any-data-to-support-higher...
22.
by aadvani 6y ago
Also, we actually did this one, if you’re curious: https://www.inpharmd.com/is-there-any-data-to-support-higher...
23.
by aadvani 6y ago
Thanks for the correction I actually typed 6 every 24 but found it confusing and resulted in error, fixed now
24.
by aadvani 6y ago
We started with a for us, by us approach to build our content and a brand first. The reason every patient knows of the Physicians Desk Reference is because they believe their doc relies on the PDR. In just 10 years I’ve seen the doctor go f
25.
by aadvani 6y ago
This is our hope :-)
26.
by aadvani 6y ago
Haha good point When Sherlock is older we may let him go by his middle name
27.
by aadvani 6y ago
Thanks so much! Hearing we saved you time is our favorite type of feedback!
28.
by aadvani 6y ago
Off label questions (questions outside the FDA approved indications of a drug) are fun for us. There are so many great ones and this is where the traditional references fall short. We just have to be fair and balanced about how we present (
29.
by aadvani 6y ago
Sorry it didn’t land with you. We’re constantly torn between writing for the one person (a healthcare provider) vs a larger population. An example question is a fantastic idea and will land with both audiences :-) We’ll get our top three m
30.
by aadvani 6y ago
I can understand this take, many docs don’t like to ask questions at all. But there’s a new school type of doc that realizes how vast the medical literature is (20m studies), how quickly it’s changing (20,000 just added on COVID), and has t

More ›