YmiYugy

6 ms·

1.
by YmiYugy 19d ago
What does it mean though for a GUI to be keyboard-driven? The obvious way is that every action simply gets a shortcut assigned. My counter would be that that is not really keyboard-driven, but merely keyboard-compatible.There is the issue o
2.
by YmiYugy 19d ago
The thing is that mobile browsers fill fight you tooth and nail against providing a good experience to your users. There is the obvious stuff like lots of API not being available, but the bigger issue to me is how many common convenient UI
3.
by YmiYugy 29d ago
I think the UX around pull requests and code reviews are extremely difficult to get right and to this day I haven't seen a platform that I'm really happy with. There are bits and pieces in some places but none really bring stuff t
4.
by YmiYugy 29d ago
I'm confused. I thought Mythos 5 and Fable 5 were exactly the same model just with a different security layer in front of it. Could they mean the Mythos 5 Preview?
5.
by YmiYugy 1mo ago
I find the title highly misleading. The actual claim is a 40% lower chance (1 in 100 as opposed to 1 in 60) for taxi and ambulance drivers when compared to the average. That’s a big drop but the title implies that Alzheimer’s is rare in tax
6.
by YmiYugy 2mo ago
IMHO the output is bad enough that I can't imagine a use case for illustrations of this kind.
7.
by YmiYugy 2mo ago
I don't think it's a bad way to benchmark new models, I just find it concerning that the author implies that "pelican on a bicycle" has been exhausted. At the risk of making overly broad, unfalsifiable claims I think mul
8.
by YmiYugy 2mo ago
I remain skeptical of that line of reasoning. 1. There is quite the mania right now and security layers are definitely overzealous. I would expect that to get better with some more time, so models will perform security analysis and reviews
9.
by YmiYugy 2mo ago
Yeah, seems pretty likely. Anthropic will make the case that their models should be evaluated with the safety layer in front, because that is the only way the model is available whereas open weight models need to pass the same test just on
10.
by YmiYugy 2mo ago
I think it’s death by a thousand cuts. I think internet connections are the least of the issue. Plenty of people have gaming PCs wired to 1Gb/s fiber. It may even be better because users can be close together. Where I see bigger issues
11.
by YmiYugy 2mo ago
I don’t think there is a ton of spare capacity. But even if there was the machines are designed for AI not gaming, e.g. low CPU clocks, the GPUs don’t have RT cores or video encoders, etc. Stadia had custom hardware, GeForce Now uses workst
12.
by YmiYugy 2mo ago
Seeing a comparison of different Wayland compositors could be very interesting.
13.
by YmiYugy 3mo ago
But SOTA models used liberally at API pricing is a lot more than $10/hour. You can probably burn $100+/hour with just a single agent, and probably thousands when running agents programmatically, e.g. workflows.
14.
by YmiYugy 3mo ago
I’m writing a lot of React code and find that the cheaper models are pretty terrible. Maybe I’m holding it wrong but the experience that the cheaper model is usually enough just track with my experience. Worse, I find predicting the difficu
15.
by YmiYugy 3mo ago
Makes me wonder, as people grow to trust the AI more and more, not reading the code and barely skimming the implementation plans and simply rerolling if something doesn't work, will the value of these chats erode? Thinking back 1-1.5 y
16.
by YmiYugy 4mo ago
Getting users to open a message isn’t a terribly high bar. As a user I would not find it acceptable if needed to be careful with which message I open. We tried putting the responsibility on the user with email attachments and I think it’s
17.
by YmiYugy 4mo ago
AI or not, it’s always been reasonable common that a bunch of related vulnerabilities get discovered after shortly after the original one.
18.
by YmiYugy 5mo ago
So according to the benchmarks somewhere in between Opus 4.7 and Mythos
19.
by YmiYugy 5mo ago
Because judging failure is itself a complex task requiring a potentially expensive model.
20.
by YmiYugy 5mo ago
Of course you don't NEED the better models, but figuring out what model you need can waste a lot of time and effort. Even when a cheap model is capable of a task it needs a lot more guidance than a more expensive one. They are also les
21.
by YmiYugy 5mo ago
1. They heavily subsidized their plans vs. paying for API. 2. They allowed me to use the subscription in every tool I wanted. 3. It covered both Anthropic and OpenAI.
22.
by YmiYugy 5mo ago
That seems not possible.
23.
by YmiYugy 5mo ago
Yes, please! But browsers need to make it easier for things to exist in user space. That means reviving CSS Houdini, particularly reviving the animation and layout worklets. (It got abandoned because browser vendors (Chrome in particular)
24.
by YmiYugy 5mo ago
I tried to use <dialog> and found it to be a pain. I wanted to close it when clicking outside, but Safari doesn't support closedBy. Some Safari versions on iOS broke when trying to style my backdrop with tailwind. The tailwind C
25.
by YmiYugy 5mo ago
I think cutting the legacy and doing things with the benefit of hindsight would make for a much nicer platform. For example something like CSS Houdini (making CSS extensible) might have actually happened if browsers where designed for it an
26.
by YmiYugy 5mo ago
1. I think it's pretty clear that the frameworks sold themselves, because it's possible to see the DX benefits with anything beyond a hello world. You don't need Meta's scale. It came from the big companies because they
27.
by YmiYugy 5mo ago
There are proposals with some traction that would enable webbrowsers to parse TS, but simply ignore the types. I think it's a bad idea, because tooling handles that perfectly well and I think browsers should generally avoid building fu
28.
by YmiYugy 5mo ago
I think it's totally fair, but I would assume that most Spring projects make significant DX tradeoffs compared to a full JS stack or serve an API rather than html. 1. Spring + Handlebars: You can either write the html template in a str
29.
by YmiYugy 5mo ago
The article lists, things like transpilers, polyfills, tree shaking, minification, CSS transformation, then declares that this is all super complex and that we need to start over. To me as a dev these are elements that have started to work
30.
by YmiYugy 5mo ago
Part of what makes a good user experience is is working nicely with the users hardware and software stack and that's much easier on the client. The user would like the website to have native scroll physics, respect their system prefere

More ›