5 ms·
So according to the benchmarks somewhere in between Opus 4.7 and Mythos
by YmiYugy 5mo ago
So according to the benchmarks somewhere in between Opus 4.7 and Mythos
- jorl17 5mo agoGPT 5.4 is already better than Opus 4.7 to me. But, then again, Opus 4.7 is a massive disappointment. I hope they don't discontinue 4.6.
- steinvakt2 5mo agoI’ve had great experience using opus 4.7 in cursor. Works for everything including iOS frontend
- jorl17 5mo agoCursor is what I daily-drive. 4.7 has been terrible for my mostly python-driven work (whereas Opus 4.6 was literally revolutionary to me). Our frontend folks are also complaining. I left a comment here with this sentiment https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47879896 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47879896
- benjiro3000 5mo ago[dead]
- robwwilliams 5mo agoDepends in goals. For long free-firm discussions I find Opus 4.7 Adaptive better/deeper than Opus 4.6 Extended. But usual caveats apply: first week of use and token budget seems generous now on Max 5X.
- coffeemug 5mo agoI had the opposite experience. Opus 4.6 extended feels like the first genuinely intelligent model to converse with, Opus 4.7 adaptive feels like slightly smarter LinkedIn slop.