Umn44

6 ms·

1.
by Umn44 11y ago
"But they don't; even moderately competitive players can beat the best bots." That's because the programmers are bad at AI for that kind of game. It just means human beings don't understand how to make a good AI fo
2.
by Umn44 11y ago
The problem with "proofs" is that software is often an iterative process because the environment and problems are constantly changing. If you have a fixed known problem you can do proofs to your hearts content, but in a changing
3.
by Umn44 11y ago
All old games have good things and bad things about them. The great things about old games were the challenge. The bad thing about them was that the industry was still learning and hence many games won't age well in terms of some dim
4.
by Umn44 11y ago
"Let's be honest. Any mildly technical person knows that these kind of legal measures are technically impossible to enforce." I'm sorry to tell you but you're wrong, videogame industry is a foretelling of where we&#
5.
by Umn44 11y ago
Well considering what you've lost, I don't think you're really in a position to claim EFF is exaggerating considering the whole of copyright law has been corrupted and the industry has gotten its way every time over the last
6.
by Umn44 11y ago
> This kind of empathy with others will make you much more effective when you're creating for people who are not like you. Empathy has nothing to do with it, most people who use computers are stupid or if they are smart have irratio
7.
by Umn44 11y ago
>If you have to resort to name-calling to make your point ... you're wrong. It's that simple. Except when you're wrong, and you can actually look at research that demonstrates the bullshit people gullibly believe about the
8.
by Umn44 11y ago
"but they were fine with using brutal violence against anyone who didn't accept their doctrine of nonviolence -- especially those from different cultures, and followers of different religions (or different Protestant denominations
9.
by Umn44 11y ago
"I can't understand how people can still give governments the benefit of the doubt when they've been exposed as liars repeatedly for years." Because reasoning doesn't work that way, and many people don't grow u
10.
by Umn44 11y ago
"This statement is so naive that it blows me away. As toomuchtodo said, there's a huge difference between n car accidents per year, and the equivalent damage done by a terrorist attack," Unfortunatley from a mathematical stan
11.
by Umn44 11y ago
"So, my question, what is this feeling? How does the brain recognize that it should have this feeling?" If we take the idea seriously that the universe is unified and all knowledge is unified, then it would be safe to treat the un
12.
by Umn44 11y ago
>Universities have a responsibility to conduct human research ethically which means little given the laws of nature, all that matters is what people end up doing and measuring that statistically. If statistically speaking most people ar
13.
by Umn44 11y ago
US distribution of wealth https://imgur.com/a/FShfb http://www2.ucsc.edu/whorulesamerica/power/wealth.html