Tiberium

5 ms·

1.
by Tiberium 5d ago
I hope the future generations of models will stop with the fluff/textual clutter/overexplanations - I don't know the right term. They easily fix those once you tell them, but they still do them by default. What I mean on this
2.
Astra vs. Fable on Vending-Bench: More Money, More Aligned(andonlabs.com)
2 points by Tiberium 8d ago|1 comments
3.
by Tiberium 8d ago
https://github.com/i2cjak/T3CAD seems like another promising project
4.
by Tiberium 9d ago
Seems like pure SEO spam?
5.
by Tiberium 13d ago
> The model has appeared on the ChatGPT API. But it hasn't.
6.
by Tiberium 14d ago
This is just C2PA for Claude-processed files, apparently. It's not related to their text watermarking. C2PA is file metadata and can be trivially stripped away, unlike hidden watermarks, e.g. SynthID.
7.
12TB Steam leak exposes old game builds from 2003 to 2013(videocardz.com)
12 points by Tiberium 17d ago|0 comments
8.
by Tiberium 18d ago
This isn't an open source project like Anubis and apparently you have to pay $50 for advanced features: > POWBlock is shareware. Good shareware we hope, because we only gate the optional "enterprise-level" super-nerd stuff
9.
by Tiberium 19d ago
I'm surprised that this distro's headline is "The Windows 7 experience on Linux" even though it's using a vague Windows-style XFCE theme. If someone's interested in a real Windows 7 lookalike, take a look at h
10.
by Tiberium 24d ago
There is quite old research on this: - https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.14455 - https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.05566 - https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.13722
11.
Training AI to Paint with Code(surya.website)
230 points by Tiberium 24d ago|28 comments
12.
by Tiberium 24d ago
> its impossible to do this fully with anthropic or openai It is possible, but is way more involved. You need to get cyber verification for either of them, and it's a little easier to get with OpenAI. Afterwards you can do such work
13.
by Tiberium 27d ago
I'm sorry, but it looks like someone's tiny game demo when they're learning HTML, with random mismatching assets pulled from some free packs (I guess in this case they're just generated). I fail to see any novelty or tec
14.
by Tiberium 29d ago
Unfortunately this is a very misleading post. I don't doubt the end result - it's useful that it works, but it's not "natively" and, unlike what some people assume, Claude didn't write a driver. It basically us
15.
by Tiberium 29d ago
Unfortunately this is a very misleading article and headline. I don't doubt the end result - it's useful that it works, but it's not "natively" and, unlike what some people assume, Claude didn't write a driver.
16.
by Tiberium 1mo ago
So we can just make posts with any titles like that now? Look, I understand the optimism in open-weight models, but this headline is, well, far from reality. This repo has a lot of huge claims with a lot of amazing scores in the table, but
17.
by Tiberium 1mo ago
Isn't a lot of OpenAI infra also on Azure? They seem to be faring better than GitHub.
18.
Accurate local Claude 4.7+ tokenizer(tokenize.rs)
1 points by Tiberium 1mo ago|0 comments
19.
by Tiberium 1mo ago
3.7 Flash gets 56 on AA up from 52 for 3.6 Flash. But it seems like this is at the cost of more output tokens per task: 3.6 Flash is 26k, 3.7 Flash is 37k. Due to 3.7 Flash's 2x slashed pricing it's still cheaper per task.
20.
by Tiberium 1mo ago
Unfortunately in this case that's not true at all, there was no provider with genuinely close or the same effective prices (mostly based on cache hit cost) to old v4 flash or v4 pro. People have this misconception that other providers
21.
by Tiberium 1mo ago
Funny result from the web demo. I'm well aware that it's an extremely small and, well, stupid, model, but even so: Query: HN Result: { "function_calls": [ { "name": "lock_door", &quo
22.
by Tiberium 1mo ago
LLM
23.
by Tiberium 1mo ago
(Not quoting the article directly due to HN's auto AI filters) In "Common mistakes" this article first says not to add this record if you're not actually planning to sell the domain, then says that the record doesn'
24.
by Tiberium 1mo ago
RFC: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc10023.html
25.
by Tiberium 1mo ago
I had not hit any guardrails with reverse engineering (as long as its not related to security) with GPT 5.5 or 5.6 Sol, so you should try those. At worst with Sol you might see the warning in Codex that your request is being checked for sec
26.
by Tiberium 1mo ago
If you don't want to get cyber verified, you can try an open-weight model such as Kimi K3 for that, it has looser internal safety training.
27.
by Tiberium 1mo ago
For OpenAI's Cyber verification (the normal kind for Codex) you absolutely do not need any proof of cybersecurity work/authorization. They just use Persona for KYC + live selfie, and some extra checks that I don't know the na
28.
by Tiberium 1mo ago
You don't need an invite only program to just have Sol checking for vulnerabilities in binaries or code. But yeah I've hit guardrails a few times when Sol was making PoCs for the vulnerabilities it found (but most of the time it m
29.
by Tiberium 1mo ago
I had to register a second account because on my main one verification always failed, and when I contacted support they said that I've tried too many times and can't verify on that account.
30.
by Tiberium 1mo ago
https://chatgpt.com/cyber is not new for OpenAI, and yes it's basically just KYC + likely some other invisible checks on your account, you don't to be a famous security researchers. Anthropic's cyber verifica

More ›