I think the perceived situation is a matter of degree. I would say there's a measurable (almost overwhelming) amount of corporate influence already. I have no

I think the perceived situation is a matter of degree. I would say there's a measurable (almost overwhelming) amount of corporate influence already. I have no doubt there are agency operatives influencing discussion online, from recorded precedence. Calling the concept 'nonsense' is overly dismissive. Regardless, using that kind of claim to deflect from the premise isn't a compelling reason to invalidate the concept. Ideas can stand on their own.