Simon321

7 ms·

1.
by Simon321 3mo ago
These are the consequences of fear mongering as hard as they did. You reap what you sow. Now they need to convince the government that they didn't mean anything of the previous things they claimed.
2.
by Simon321 3mo ago
Exactly, it's a failure of Anthropic and others to understand cyber security. Finding security bugs in software is a good thing and not evil. It will lead to more secure software. Defense and offense in cyber security are two sides of
3.
by Simon321 6mo ago
Only if your openclaw instance is publicly exposed on the internet... which is not the case for most people
4.
by Simon321 7mo ago
> Imagine if we had 5 million geniuses as smart or smarter than Tao doing quantum physics. This is a real possibility in our lifetimes due to AI.
5.
by Simon321 9mo ago
i don't know, chat gpt seems to hallucinate a lot less
6.
by Simon321 10mo ago
>especially as we won’t work on product marketing for AI stuff, from a moral standpoint, but the vast majority of enquiries have been for exactly that. I intentionally ignored the biggest invention of the 21st century out of strange pers
7.
by Simon321 1y ago
it was free
8.
by Simon321 2y ago
Does it support AWS Bedrock instead of Anthropic as a provider?
9.
by Simon321 2y ago
It's a mixture of experts model. Only a small part of those parameters are active at any given time. I believe it's 16x110B
10.
by Simon321 2y ago
Yes that's true, but if you ask to give the full code specifically it should do do
11.
by Simon321 2y ago
Exactly, i don't understand why people are not seeing this
12.
by Simon321 2y ago
He coined the concept 'singularity' in the sense of machines becoming smarter than humans what a time for him to die with all the advancements we're seeing in artificial intelligence. I wonder what he thought about it all. &g
13.
by Simon321 3y ago
'gpt-4-turbo-preview' is the one that always points to the latest version of gpt-4-turbo
14.
by Simon321 3y ago
Well it could be argued that it does, what about supersonic nuclear missiles?
15.
by Simon321 3y ago
> You also informed the leadership team that allowing the company to be destroyed “would be consistent with the mission.” First class board they have.
16.
by Simon321 3y ago
Interesting to see how many people were clamouring that deep learning hit a wall and the whole thing was a fad that would end soon right before it exploded.
17.
by Simon321 3y ago
I am from the EU, not an American. I am not anti regulation in general. An example of where this has happened before was with GMO's: > In 2006, the World Trade Organization concluded that the EU moratorium, which had been in effect
18.
by Simon321 3y ago
ChatGPT and stable diffusion are killing people now? I think incorrect output of regular software is actually killing people but we don't need a license to write code.
19.
by Simon321 3y ago
If this wouldn't apply to these foundation models then why would they write an article on how they currently comply or not? > We assess the compliance of 10 foundation model providers—and their flagship foundation models—with 12 of
20.
by Simon321 3y ago
Seems to EU is determined to cripple their AI industry at all costs, we already have so little technology companies... Foundation models are labelled as 'high risk'! In my opinion this is way too premature... this would cripple op
21.
by Simon321 3y ago
That's because it's not authentically trying to address a problem but trying to convince an audience of something by appealing to authority. Elizabeth Holmes & Theranos were masters of collecting authorities to back their bogu
22.
by Simon321 3y ago
This fallacy is also known as Pascal's wager: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pascal%27s_wager But this argument got billions of people to believe in the concept of hell so i expect it to work again to convince peop
23.
by Simon321 3y ago
I actually did this before the 7th of may: https://www.reddit.com/r/StableDiffusion/comments/13axnoa/tr... Maybe OP was inspired? Seems like a big coincidence otherwise. Just wish he would've credit
24.
by Simon321 3y ago
Too bad you're being downvoted because you're making very good points. All the counter arguments are arguments from authority also.
25.
by Simon321 3y ago
You've answered your own question: Change the system. If we get too good at automating jobs there should be a social safety net so we can all enjoy the fruits of AI.
26.
by Simon321 3y ago
Faking images to try and change history is as old as Stalin: https://www.history.com/news/josef-stalin-great-purge-photo-...
27.
by Simon321 3y ago
Do we do things like this for other technology or for other software? Why the huge intense fear as soon as someone puts a label 'AI' on a piece of software?
28.
by Simon321 3y ago
"Loom incident database" By the Ned Ludd organisation History repeats itself
29.
by Simon321 3y ago
Well, that's the whole point of the article you're replying to! His whole problem is that AI will do those jobs and he doesn't like that.
30.
by Simon321 3y ago
majority of funding for the organisation*

More ›