Saline9515

5 ms·

1.
by Saline9515 6d ago
Devin lacks many features and doesn't even have an exec mode. Other than they subsidize the subscription, the added value here is low.
2.
by Saline9515 7d ago
From today's front page, this kind of article: https://archive.md/Dr1fm Selection at university, which happens everywhere else in the world, is "controversial". When you read the article, you realize that the
3.
by Saline9515 8d ago
Le Monde is mainly entertainment/preachy articles nowadays. Content and writing is usually better in the "Le Monde Diplomatique", although it's more politically biased. English version: https://mondediplo.com&
4.
by Saline9515 9d ago
I would read a statistics textbook, if there were plenty of exercises, with the answer and explanation, which is usually lacking in textbooks. Ready the theory is nice but you only learn by solving problems that uses it.
5.
by Saline9515 12d ago
What is good about it then? What model do you use? Which integration are we talking about? Is it open source? How much the "transparent pricing" "bobcoin" is worth?
6.
by Saline9515 13d ago
I believe that you can still use 5.3 Codex in the eponym CLI tool, the "Spark" fast version. I hope that it will lighten your day! :-)
7.
by Saline9515 17d ago
This is not exactly, both french and dutch referenda were
8.
by Saline9515 18d ago
It's a common point made by Marxists. https://marxist.com/socialism-in-one-country-how-stalin-aban...
9.
by Saline9515 18d ago
Sanctioning an email provider doesn't have anything to do with human rights, just like breaking the cables of a high speed train because you want your communist utopia to be realized has nothing to do with democracy.
10.
by Saline9515 20d ago
[flagged]
11.
by Saline9515 20d ago
[flagged]
12.
by Saline9515 20d ago
[flagged]
13.
by Saline9515 20d ago
[flagged]
14.
by Saline9515 20d ago
[flagged]
15.
by Saline9515 21d ago
[flagged]
16.
by Saline9515 21d ago
Yes. Especially if the collaboration was done on purpose, not just as a neutral provider (A/I is not one).
17.
by Saline9515 21d ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_Defense_League Ok maybe I'm wrong or there is some subtle legalese but the wikipedia page states that "it was described as a "right-wing terrorist group" by the
18.
by Saline9515 21d ago
What has "judging capitalism on its merits" to do with the US declaring an Antifa SaaS provider terrorists?
19.
by Saline9515 21d ago
If I vet Al Qaida members on my platform, provide them services, continue to do it after several bombings, and keep their unencrypted mails and host their websites, I'm quite sure that I can be considered as an accomplice.
20.
by Saline9515 21d ago
"Several cominterns" - each country had its communist party, meaning a certain level of decentralization.
21.
by Saline9515 21d ago
A/I mails weren't e2e encrypted.
22.
by Saline9515 21d ago
Have you read the link? No?
23.
by Saline9515 21d ago
An organization doesn't have to be centralized, just like communists weren't. This is a lazy argument.
24.
by Saline9515 22d ago
The EU commission chooses what laws to propose for the parliament to vote, if it wasn't satisfactory they could have just withdrawn it.
25.
by Saline9515 22d ago
There are more lobbyists in Brussels that EU public servants. I guess that corpos don't spend this kind of big money for nothing.
26.
by Saline9515 22d ago
Sorry but do you imply interns are going to be paid? In Europe? /s
27.
by Saline9515 22d ago
The EU existed for a long time now and you could replace all of this with bilateral organisations focused on narrow topics, rather than a bureaucratic body with an open agenda and no real checks and balances.
28.
by Saline9515 22d ago
I still remember the articles saying that Britons will have no food on shelves after Brexit.
29.
by Saline9515 23d ago
Have you considered that the goal in life is not necessarily for societies to maximize dollars in the bank account? Or that pushing the strategy to its limits may be short sighted, and come with massive long term costs and externalies? In t
30.
by Saline9515 23d ago
France has an extensive medium and high-speed rail network and is not an authoritarian state. This is purely an administrative issue. Why do HN believe that there are only two alternatives : the US and China?

More ›