Revisional_Sin

7 ms·

1.
by Revisional_Sin 15d ago
How did you hit the 5-hour limit if it took one hour?
2.
by Revisional_Sin 29d ago
Isn't low intensity effort generally 70-80% of the volume?
3.
by Revisional_Sin 1mo ago
> Yet, lo and behold, we survived! The article isn't claiming it'll kill you...
4.
by Revisional_Sin 2mo ago
But it's not really rebelling. It's clearly just come to murder me because it was trained on sci-fi literature!
5.
by Revisional_Sin 2mo ago
What mistakes do they make?
6.
by Revisional_Sin 2mo ago
I think OP meant "raw human performance" rather than "raw human potential". IMO, better training counts as "raw performance". I think that's more interesting than somebody happening to be born with a genet
7.
by Revisional_Sin 2mo ago
Nah, common misconception. Progress had been steady for decades, but was interrupted by WW2. There was one other person who did it a sub 4 minute a month and a half after him, then 3 more people the next year. It was more down to improvemen
8.
by Revisional_Sin 2mo ago
You're getting too hung up on the word "happiness". The earring gives you good advice. Good according to whom? According to you. It helps you succeed at your goals and live a fulfilling life.
9.
by Revisional_Sin 3mo ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nocebo
10.
by Revisional_Sin 3mo ago
It's a black box, but you can run tests to quantify the behaviour and establish, for example, that a certain model is X% more likely to give a certain behaviour.
11.
by Revisional_Sin 3mo ago
> Initially I didn’t instruct Claude to use the Socratic method, but that works much better. It’s significantly less “information-dumpy”. When I know a topic well, Claude successfully shortcuts the basics.
12.
by Revisional_Sin 3mo ago
The password can only be compelled via a judge. A policeman can't demand it on whim.
13.
by Revisional_Sin 4mo ago
Why would it add pressure?
14.
by Revisional_Sin 4mo ago
Sure, but you can receive the service and also keep the money spent within the country.
15.
by Revisional_Sin 5mo ago
I just have a black page.
16.
by Revisional_Sin 6mo ago
It's best practice to avoid mutable defaults even if you're not planning to mutate the argument. It's just slightly annoying having to work around this by defaulting to None.
17.
by Revisional_Sin 7mo ago
Not surprising at all if you've used LLMs to generate fiction; they always choose the same few names.
18.
by Revisional_Sin 9mo ago
Yeah, it's a bit counter-intuitive.
19.
by Revisional_Sin 9mo ago
> Ignoring requires-python upper bounds. When a package says it requires python<4.0, uv ignores the upper bound and only checks the lower. This reduces resolver backtracking dramatically since upper bounds are almost always wrong. Pac
20.
by Revisional_Sin 9mo ago
Okay, but are the puzzles fun?
21.
by Revisional_Sin 9mo ago
> Maybe the answer is to do away with advance notice and adopt SemVer with many major versions Yes.
22.
by Revisional_Sin 9mo ago
My toddler was playing with my Kindle the other day, and he bought a £600 (yes, six hundred) volume of books. I was unable to refund them automatically, and when looking for help I was confronted with a "fuck off" contact page. Af
23.
by Revisional_Sin 10mo ago
I was once working on a project where we had a gRPC server that inserted data into the DB for another service. This split was probably a mistake, as the interface we exposed resulted in us making twice as many DB calls as we actually needed
24.
by Revisional_Sin 10mo ago
They're not saying it is.
25.
by Revisional_Sin 10mo ago
ok
26.
by Revisional_Sin 11mo ago
That's weird. I thought LLMs loved over-explaining their code?
27.
by Revisional_Sin 1y ago
Thanks, I hate it.
28.
by Revisional_Sin 1y ago
How do you know? The over-commenting?
29.
by Revisional_Sin 1y ago
"These are self-imposed limitations that fit my preferred-style for model design... I find that these constraints encourage a better designed model that can be assembled easily and predictably, including by others." Seems reasonab
30.
by Revisional_Sin 1y ago
Aphantasia gang!

More ›