RandVal30142

11 ms·

1.
by RandVal30142 9y ago
I still feel like people havent figured out this internet thing. If I want to report on a post by say some scrubby Islamic State propagandist I'm going to do it. They can ban me but it will just become part of the reporting. Then give
2.
by RandVal30142 9y ago
>don't report on posts Make me.
3.
by RandVal30142 9y ago
>the trusted setup can only be used to create fake Zcash, not deanonymize transactions. "I think we can successfully make Zcash too traceable for criminals like WannaCry, but still completely private & fungible" "I _do
4.
by RandVal30142 9y ago
> liberals Who are you talking to?
5.
by RandVal30142 9y ago
>You’re just not free to keep using the site afterwards. Bring me to court about that one.
6.
by RandVal30142 9y ago
Zcash takes one of the only novel parts of Bitcoin, not requiring trust in a central authority, and pitches it into the garbage. The garbage is likely where Zcash belongs.
7.
Russia Recruited YouTubers to Bash ‘Racist B*tch’ Hillary Clinton Over Rap Beats(thedailybeast.com)
5 points by RandVal30142 9y ago|0 comments
8.
by RandVal30142 9y ago
>Do they? Trump did run pandering to conservative wishes to defund the EPA. Trump won and is defunding the EPA. So yes. > Or do they want to reduce some of the more obscure, less clearly useful regulations? So obscure they involve the
9.
by RandVal30142 9y ago
> you pretended that nobody wanted them Who was I commenting to? You or the user whose post my comment showed up under? > So let's have all those examples But that is not what you asked for. Try again, smarter not harder.
10.
by RandVal30142 9y ago
>I'd also like a concise description that indicates how the changes will roll the US back to the intense pollution problems that existed 30+ years ago. Why would I alter my comment to be in tune with what you want when I was respond
11.
by RandVal30142 9y ago
No just pointing out you are creating a false narrative. >There are many thousands of regulations. They don't all make sense. They're not all necessary. "Soooo many regulations, we couldn't possibly need all of these.
12.
by RandVal30142 9y ago
>You're buying into a false narrative. You're making up a false narrative.
13.
by RandVal30142 9y ago
Restrictions on coal fired power plants is the first that comes to mind: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trumps-epa-to-ease-emissions-re... Would you like more? edit: No? One example was enough? But I had so much more. :(
14.
by RandVal30142 9y ago
Is this written by a bot? Another post by this "author" rambles on about Black Lives Matters and white women sucking horse cock: https://medium.com/@NewsPowered/black-lives-matter-protester... What the hell a
15.
Blockstream Attacking Bitcoin Businesses, Reporting Them to Authorities(twitter.com)
3 points by RandVal30142 9y ago|0 comments
16.
FEMA restores deleted Puerto Rico statistics after uproar(thehill.com)
2 points by RandVal30142 9y ago|0 comments
17.
Blockstream Continues to Fabricate Lies About the Bitcoin Community(twitter.com)
8 points by RandVal30142 9y ago|0 comments
18.
by RandVal30142 9y ago
>Bitcoin.org is controlled by the same people and should not be taken as any sort of an authority. Not sure if many people here are aware, but r/Bitcoin mod Theymos and others in the Core/Blockstream circle proposed and support
19.
by RandVal30142 9y ago
>How about you address the similarities Because it diverts the topic. It is literally introducing the fallacy seen in "And you are lynching Negroes[1]" to avoid the subject. Because of people like you we cannot discuss being vi
20.
by RandVal30142 9y ago
> the consensus The consensus for bitcoin is made within the network itself. Not on a mentally unstable person's poll. Luke-jr, aka the Blockstream coder/troll who has used his pool to maliciously kill other cryptocoins[1], mad
21.
by RandVal30142 9y ago
"Great anger" -Trump, commenting on the divisiveness he sowed using his supporters & the subject of the NFL protests, while ignoring Puerto Rico.
22.
by RandVal30142 9y ago
>same can be said for US actions over the past decades Is this really the best response? A deflection? Do you know how tiring it gets? How little it advances discussion? My peers are being hunted for documenting war crimes but OK US did
23.
by RandVal30142 9y ago
>And I feel lately that they are now trying to build a case for some sort of conflict, presumably cold, against Russia. Russia invaded Ukraine & Crimea, ended up downing a civilian airliner killing them all. Slaughtered hospital work
24.
by RandVal30142 9y ago
Not saying Qualcomm is on or off any hook but perhaps Apple's valuations are a bit off and Qualcomm's closer to reality.
25.
by RandVal30142 9y ago
>Apple's assertion is that the pricing is not Fair or Reasonable I assert Apple's markup on products is not fair or reasonable. Perhaps Qualcomm's demands are in line with the true value of the device and not the pie in th
26.
by RandVal30142 9y ago
>Apple can't really do that (sell a phone without Qualcomm IP). Maybe they should do some long term investments in this realm if it is where they choose to make their profits from? Or pound sand in court..
27.
OPCW Confirms Use of Sarin on Civilians Days Before Khan Sheikhoun Attack(twitter.com)
1 points by RandVal30142 9y ago|0 comments
28.
by RandVal30142 9y ago
"Great anger" -The damned President, encouraging his people into further divisiveness. Yea no fucking way I'm supporting this admin in cataloging anyone.
29.
by RandVal30142 9y ago
>I hope you aren't suggesting selling people a broken firearm. Nah, more like disabling them so I can mount them up on a wall as a showpiece. I honestly never contemplated that route until after I sold them.
30.
by RandVal30142 9y ago
>Because any of these law-abiding refugees Taking your garbage edit of the parent comment and setting it totally aside: Legal firearms routinely become illegal, most often when they are stolen by people who are already criminals. Unlocke

More ›