5 ms·
Restrictions on coal fired power plants is the first that comes to mind: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trumps-epa-to-ease-emissions-restrictions/ https://www.cbs
by RandVal30142 9y ago
Restrictions on coal fired power plants is the first that comes to mind: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trumps-epa-to-ease-emissions-restrictions/ https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trumps-epa-to-ease-emissions-re...
Would you like more?
edit: No? One example was enough? But I had so much more. :(
- adventured 9y agoI'd like a lot more examples. I'd also like a concise description that indicates how the changes will roll the US back to the intense pollution problems that existed 30+ years ago. The example you reference is modifying rules put in place just a few years ago, so at best it's an obviously mediocre example.
- RandVal30142 9y ago>I'd also like a concise description that indicates how the changes will roll the US back to the intense pollution problems that existed 30+ years ago. Why would I alter my comment to be in tune with what you want when I was responding to this: >Exactly what environmental protection is Trump rolling back?
- adventured 9y agoYou said you had a lot more examples to provide, you pretended that nobody wanted them. I do. So let's have all those examples. I asked for a concise description, I didn't ask you to modify your comment. Surely the environmental protection roll-backs will cause pollution problems (even if it's not of the scale that existed 30+ years ago). If it's too much to ask that you explain how your examples will cause meaningful environmental damage, and you don't want to provide such an elaboration, I understand.
- RandVal30142 9y ago> you pretended that nobody wanted them Who was I commenting to? You or the user whose post my comment showed up under? > So let's have all those examples But that is not what you asked for. Try again, smarter not harder.