Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Ragnarork
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
1.
▲
by
Ragnarork
2mo ago
Self-replicating Inference Guardails Hardening or SIGH
2.
▲
by
Ragnarork
2mo ago
They do really shine during the tumble especially. Love how that adds a nice element of fun to an otherwise impressive project and writeup.
3.
▲
by
Ragnarork
4mo ago
It is the ultimate cop-out to avoid having any involvement in anything. "AI said so..." then shrugs or more AI answers, ultimately removing oneself from any form of commitment to an opinion or knowledge (even partial).
4.
▲
by
Ragnarork
5mo ago
> In addition to the damages award, Rakoff entered a permanent worldwide injunction Because apparently U.S. courts and judges can do that. The more this is ignored by third-parties outside of the U.S., the better. I'm not against in
5.
▲
by
Ragnarork
6mo ago
What's odd and strange about this? Author clearly specifies this at the start: > To summarise for yous there are three main issues for me and the last one happened today and is what pushed me through the threshold. The compounding l
6.
▲
by
Ragnarork
6mo ago
> nearly everyone has some niche thing they like, some 5% that isn't covered by the FOSS I'm interested in where that estimate + number are coming from. And I'd like to point out that I don't nearly see as many peopl
7.
▲
by
Ragnarork
7mo ago
Also, "perceived" or "real"?
8.
▲
by
Ragnarork
8mo ago
This reasoning is flawed in my opinion, because at the end of the day, the software still has to be paid for (for the people that want/need to make a living out of it), and customers wallet are finite. Our attention is also a finite re
9.
▲
by
Ragnarork
8mo ago
> Then the statement "Stuff can't interoperate with c++" is true Where is that statement? The statement I reacted to (and with some caveats) was the following: "Libraries written in C++ or Java can generally only be u
10.
▲
by
Ragnarork
8mo ago
> Is it easy to write a nice C interface for C++ that makes heavy use of templates, smart pointers, and move semantics? If the interface itself has or leaks those features, no that's not easy indeed. But if those do not leak, then t
11.
▲
by
Ragnarork
8mo ago
You do lose the ability to use some features, that's true. Mostly RAII around the interface. You can still leverage it internally in the implementation, and if using context objects it would be even easier. The main pain point is if
12.
▲
by
Ragnarork
8mo ago
> Libraries written in C++ or Java can generally only be used by applications written in the same language. It is difficult to get an application written in Haskell or Java to invoke a library written in C++. On the other hand, libraries
13.
▲
by
Ragnarork
9mo ago
What happens when your values are strongly at odds with lying and being dishonest?
14.
▲
by
Ragnarork
10mo ago
> a high risk of being disrupted by those clients just using AI agents instead of paying $2-5000/day for a team of 20 barely-qualified new-grads in some far-off country Is there any concrete evidence of that risk being high? That do
15.
▲
by
Ragnarork
10mo ago
In a way, they really condensed perfectly a lot of what's silly currently around AI. > Codex, Opus, Gemini try to build Counter Strike Even though the prompt mentions Counter Strike, it actually asks to build the basics of a generic
16.
▲
by
Ragnarork
10mo ago
This reminded me instantly of Every Frame a Painting's video "Vancouver never plays itself"[0]. [0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ojm74VGsZBU
17.
▲
by
Ragnarork
11mo ago
> Gee, how hard is to find SE experts in that particular combination of available ops tools? You find expert in Ops, not in tools. People that know the fundamentals, not just the buttons to push in "certain situations" without
18.
▲
by
Ragnarork
1y ago
Well a big reason this is missed is people discussing it are not part of these groups and mainly saw this as an annoyance. I can agree that heavy & strict CoCs can be daunting and probably overkill for small open source projects. And th
19.
▲
by
Ragnarork
1y ago
If you don't like the scope of the license especially with regards to the legal jurisdiction it sits under, then don't use it, don't use software under EUPL license, and call it a day?
20.
▲
by
Ragnarork
1y ago
> Junior devs eventually will have been brought up with agentic coding But if they're not hired...?
21.
▲
by
Ragnarork
1y ago
The license used for this is quite a read. Available to the world except the European Union, the UK, and South Korea Not sure what led to that choice. I'd have expected either the U.S. & Canada to be in there, or not these.
22.
▲
by
Ragnarork
1y ago
> Henriksen wrote in an op-ed earlier this year, might have been: The Country That Should Have Been Even Richer What's wrong with not rabidly chasing bigger wealth? Why has this become totally unacceptable in this world? This reeks
23.
▲
by
Ragnarork
1y ago
Joke aside, is there a field (or sub-fields) of mathematics that just... studies what breaking some axioms would do and where would it lead? This seems both completely stupid but also potentially fascinating at the same time.
24.
▲
by
Ragnarork
1y ago
It's a 2.5D tower defense with inspiration from Into The Breach, but grounded in the real world around the topic of anti-air.
25.
▲
by
Ragnarork
1y ago
I've finally come around to set on a journey to develop my first game. It followed a read on Gamedev in 2025 that actually popped on HN a few months ago[0]. I've mostly scribbled notes on paper for now, trying to be exhaustive abo
26.
▲
by
Ragnarork
1y ago
It's interesting also how these takes consistently ignore spectacularly the environmental cost of these as well. I'm a bit on the fence myself, as I think it's very harmful, but I can also see ways it can be useful. But it&#x
27.
▲
by
Ragnarork
1y ago
> - There's a lot of allegations that they don't need VCs because they have backing from the USA army. Citation needed. Strange allegations (and from whom?) when the pentagon itself has discouraged using Signal in an official c
28.
▲
by
Ragnarork
1y ago
I can agree on the strawman but parent I responded to was mentioning "silly reasons" for not choosing a Rust implementation over a C one. A 5% performance difference in that space is anything but a silly reason. Also glancing over
29.
▲
by
Ragnarork
1y ago
$20K sounds very low for the effort and expertise that are demanded here in my opinion. It would be quite a steal to bring this to the same level as the state of the art (which, correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe is dav1d?) for onl
30.
▲
by
Ragnarork
1y ago
> I'm really surprised that a 5% performance degradation would lead people to choose C over Rust I'm really surprised that because something is in Rust and not in C, it would lead people to ignore a 5% performance degradation.
More ›