Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
RIMR
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
1.
▲
by
RIMR
5d ago
The first link is about HuggingFace, lmao.
2.
▲
by
RIMR
5d ago
This is my first time hearing about RTK, and yikes! The benchmarks mean nothing; this thing is actively dangerous to use. If my agent runs a shell command, show my agent the output of that shell command. I don't have a problem with aut
3.
▲
by
RIMR
6d ago
For real, I have like 200 kilos of cables. I could very likely reduce that down to something less severe, but that involves sorting and inventorying 200 kilos of cables.
4.
▲
by
RIMR
6d ago
To be fair, this example doesn't work because those chip bags are two physically different objects that one can consume. Sony is trying to argue that because they are selling digital copies, that consumers cannot be granted rights to t
5.
▲
by
RIMR
6d ago
As long as this does not represent a trend of splitting every feature off into its own subscription.
6.
▲
by
RIMR
7d ago
I think that vibe-coding these kinds of education tools is massively unhelpful. There are some crazy hallucinated claims in here that completely invalidate the purpose of this project. For example, the flexor retinacula (the "carpal tu
7.
▲
by
RIMR
7d ago
I felt this way for a while until I decided to sit down, start a new game, and engage with it. It's a completely different game, it just doesn't look like it if you picked back up where you left off. Without the right context, you
8.
▲
by
RIMR
8d ago
Elsewhere in this thread, you talk about how it's unfair that the far-right gets compared to Nazis, but here you call them fascists. What a weird position to be in, where you acknowledge the fascism but think Nazi comparisons go too fa
9.
▲
by
RIMR
8d ago
When people say "far right," they mean "authoritarian right," not "fringe right." Just because authoritarianism has emerged from the fringes doesn't make it any less authoritarian.
10.
▲
by
RIMR
10d ago
Did you really though? I never understood the "free speech absolutists" to care about speech they disagreed with. They made it clear that they only accept "patriotic" speech a long time ago.
11.
▲
by
RIMR
13d ago
I completely understand the concern here, but the person linked is being dramatic and obtuse. The terms seem to directly relate to your Google Antigravity account. Google has limited GCP suspensions to its cloud service, not your entire acc
12.
▲
by
RIMR
13d ago
The status is now "degraded performance". Bad look, OpenAI. This is absolutely an outage.
13.
▲
by
RIMR
14d ago
The primary functionality is that LLM text is watermarked, but this tool doesn't accept any text formats as input...
14.
▲
by
RIMR
15d ago
I like how this can be summarized as a person taking part in an ADHD test before getting off-track and overanalyzing the task without actually doing it. Good test, though—very effective.
15.
▲
by
RIMR
19d ago
Spraying paint into the jet engine of a military aircraft is not "terrorism". It may be criminal, but it was not in any way a violent crime. Given that it disabled the aircraft, it counts as more than mere vandalism, but calling t
16.
▲
by
RIMR
20d ago
>Project leader Akio Shiibashi originally set a symbolic launch target: January 1, 2001, the first day of the new millennium. I'm getting off-topic here, but I really appreciate it when people get this date right.
17.
▲
by
RIMR
20d ago
I like pushing the idea that an executive's job is both expensive and automatable. It's true, and they don't want people to figure that out. But I do not like the idea that an AI like this could end up ranking higher than hum
18.
▲
by
RIMR
21d ago
Literally every time I decide to stop ignoring X, I log in and am greeted with overt racism and religious hatred. Always a good reminder to just ignore that cesspit. I guess other people have more tolerance than I do for the constant stream
19.
▲
by
RIMR
26d ago
From what I understand, it's a fundamental problem of how to use the ridiculous-but-effective reasoning prose behind the scenes, but get concise and coherent responses to the user. You want the reasoning prose to be somewhat strange. I
20.
▲
by
RIMR
26d ago
Those books at the flea market aren't "rotting", they are available for sale. You seem perfectly fine living in a world where your flea market is devoid of books.
21.
▲
by
RIMR
27d ago
It sounds like you're approaching this narrowly for how you specifically communicate in your line of work, and not really thinking of the broader spectrum of how people communicate professionally. If people provided me the information
22.
▲
by
RIMR
27d ago
Because the AI isn't autonomous, and cannot vet it's own outputs. If an AI answers a question perfectly, I'll go with it. But if my boss fires me for no longer being needed because of the AI, good luck to him and his new idio
23.
▲
by
RIMR
27d ago
>The person on the other side has the same tools you do. No, they don't. I have access to heaps of raw information about customers and their systems that I can easily provide to my AI. That AI can also dig through all the communicat
24.
▲
by
RIMR
28d ago
People keep getting caught because they are getting too close. For ~$500 you can buy a tattoo/hair removal laser from China with enough power to blow the camera sensor to hell from a few hundred feet.
25.
▲
by
RIMR
28d ago
It's the central plot point of the entire series. If that's not "exploring the concept", you're going to have to explain why.
26.
▲
by
RIMR
1mo ago
From the article: >This wouldn't have been an issue if the organization bought a $1,000 NAS and populated it with a few hard drives. Look, I know that a certain percentage of Tom's Hardware articles are just sales pitches for a
27.
▲
by
RIMR
1mo ago
Your brain is gonna lose so much weight!
28.
▲
by
RIMR
1mo ago
> But after the study controls for age the starkness of the effect more or less disappears (eyeballing Fig 1, the 2nd graph). Adjusting for age, Alzheimers deaths were 1/100 for taxi drivers, and 1/60 for the general public. Th
29.
▲
by
RIMR
1mo ago
Because Metasploit is just for known vulnerabilities, while AI is digging around looking for new 0-days to exploit. Because Metasploit gives the decision to be malicious entirely to the human user, while AI might do something malicious unpr
30.
▲
by
RIMR
1mo ago
Correct me if I am wrong here, but isn't this just a low-quality camera sensor attached to a gimmicky transparent LCD? This is an interesting novelty, but as others have mentioned already, the function of the viewfinder doesn't ma
More ›