From the article: >This wouldn't have been an issue if the organization bought a $1,000 NAS and populated it with a few hard drives. Look, I know that a certa

From the article: >This wouldn't have been an issue if the organization bought a $1,000 NAS and populated it with a few hard drives. Look, I know that a certain percentage of Tom's Hardware articles are just sales pitches for a NAS, but this is asinine. Iron Mountain deals largely in tape storage. 50TB of tapes fits in one of their small archive boxes. If they're using the latest tech (LTO-9), it fits on 3 tapes. This is exactly how you are supposed to store archival media for decades, not on a NAS. A NAS is for storing the files you need to actively access.