MrNeon

5 ms·

1.
by MrNeon 2mo ago
>and yet we can still look at it and say "yeah that was CGI". All of it?
2.
by MrNeon 2mo ago
It doesn't lack those voiced lines because of some purposeful artistic goal.
3.
by MrNeon 2mo ago
>"privately" was off which is why it says "more privately" now The actually significant change is the addition of "This won’t change how data is collected by websites you visit and the services they use, includin
4.
by MrNeon 2mo ago
"Now you can browse privately, and other people who use this device won’t see your activity. However, downloads and bookmarks will be saved." Can you tell me how the original Incognito mode disclaimer was misleading? Even if it is
5.
by MrNeon 2mo ago
What Google was "caught" doing was exactly what it was doing in non-incognito mode already. Anyone expecting the websites you visit to know you're in private mode and to not log data is just lacking basic tech knowledge. It i
6.
by MrNeon 9mo ago
I'm curious, what would you personally consider to be a step too far in the fight against CSAM?
7.
by MrNeon 10mo ago
How Could You Possibly Be Against This?!?!? Regulation
8.
by MrNeon 10mo ago
I use Firefox with uBlock and besides a couple of times where video start was delayed by a few seconds it has been working as well as before.
9.
by MrNeon 11mo ago
Section breaks keep the formatting changes from affecting the previous/following content so you can place and format images as you wish.
10.
by MrNeon 1y ago
I've seen that sentiment on reddit as well and I can't phantom how you think it being on purpose is more likely than a mistake when 1 - The error is so blatantly large 2 - There is a graph without error right next to it 3 - The er
11.
by MrNeon 2y ago
Sure but "Also the the sora videos are proven to be modified ads" is demonstrably false, for the demos OpenAI shared and the artist made ones.
12.
by MrNeon 2y ago
Oh, so not the actual demo videos OpenAI shared on their website and twitter.
13.
by MrNeon 2y ago
> Also the the sora videos are proven to be modified ads Can't find anything about that, you got a link?
14.
by MrNeon 2y ago
MJ coomers? The same MJ that bans accounts for coomer content? Not sure that will change just because of a new frontend.
15.
by MrNeon 2y ago
> What is ultimately going to be undefeated is training your own model. From scratch?
16.
by MrNeon 2y ago
Seems to be stock footage, is it surprising makeup would be involved?
17.
by MrNeon 2y ago
It is very obvious that the amount and type of damage is not the same if you clone any random person's voice or clone a political leader's voice. It is not the same damage.
18.
by MrNeon 3y ago
> Even if it takes a thousand tries, that means one out of thousand users would get it. If they use that particular prompt that primes the model for regurgitation. It's not one in a thousand of regular queries.
19.
by MrNeon 3y ago
It is clear you're arguing from an emotional, not logical, standpoint where facts don't matter.
20.
by MrNeon 3y ago
How can we disagree on facts? There are no billionaires just sitting on billions. They are in circulation.
21.
by MrNeon 3y ago
Believe it or not billionaires are part of the public and those billions are in circulation. There are no dragons sitting on hoards of gold. More importantly: money that is not in circulation doesn't affect you or me, it has the same w
22.
by MrNeon 3y ago
> I've yet to be confused about whether something is ai generated or real for more than several seconds. How did you rule out survivorship bias?
23.
by MrNeon 3y ago
This issue here is thinking you, holding the knowledge to 3D model, are not also a holder of capital. Capital isn't just money.
24.
by MrNeon 3y ago
> but it's not a problem our economy seems equipped to solve It's not a problem at all in my opinion. > Since people like working on art projects, people will often line up to do so even when conditions and pay don't ec
25.
by MrNeon 3y ago
Is a farmer exploiting somebody's need for food?
26.
by MrNeon 3y ago
Money isn't consumed and it only has value when used.
27.
by MrNeon 3y ago
Neither are the things in question, the resources for movie making are not public, crew isn't public, actors aren't public. It's not a public resource in any way.
28.
by MrNeon 3y ago
"the public" and "public" are two different things. the labor and resource markets are private, not public.
29.
by MrNeon 3y ago
The penalty is that they lose money at the end of the day. It is not a sustainable business practice.
30.
by MrNeon 3y ago
> wastes the time and effort of everyone involved in the production with no recourse Those people were already paid for their work.

More ›