13 ms·
Neither are the things in question, the resources for movie making are not public, crew isn't public, actors aren't public. It's not a public resource in any wa
by MrNeon 3y ago
Neither are the things in question, the resources for movie making are not public, crew isn't public, actors aren't public. It's not a public resource in any way.
- arpa 3y agomoney is a public resource.
- MrNeon 3y agoMoney isn't consumed and it only has value when used.
- arpa 3y agothat's true. Therefore billions should return into circulation and/or otherwise return to the public.
- MrNeon 3y agoBelieve it or not billionaires are part of the public and those billions are in circulation. There are no dragons sitting on hoards of gold. More importantly: money that is not in circulation doesn't affect you or me, it has the same weight on the economy as all the gold still not mined.
- arpa 3y agoIt sure don't look this way to me. I guess we'll agree to disagree on most points here.
- MrNeon 3y agoHow can we disagree on facts? There are no billionaires just sitting on billions. They are in circulation.
- arpa 3y agoyour facts: billionaires not sitting on billions. My facts: homelesness exists. Also moving money from your left hand to your right is not circulation. It should "trickle down". Wonder where I heard this.
- MrNeon 3y agoIt is clear you're arguing from an emotional, not logical, standpoint where facts don't matter.