Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Mond_
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
19 ms
·
1.
▲
by
Mond_
7d ago
> Hacker News Guidelines > Please don't post shallow dismissals, especially of other people's work. A good critical comment teaches us something.
2.
▲
by
Mond_
7d ago
Where did you hear that it got pushed back out? It's going strong as far as I can tell.
3.
▲
by
Mond_
7d ago
Tao is so incredibly ahead of the curve in this regard that you trying to accuse him of not "going with the program" is a bit silly. He's not an AI Luddite by any means.
4.
▲
What makes $BigTechCompany's products bad, anyway?
(herecomesthemoon.net)
2 points
by
Mond_
7d ago
|
1 comments
5.
▲
by
Mond_
16d ago
absolutely crazy to make this a "paid tier user" feature. the primary difference between the free and the paid versions should be the amount of inference quota you have access to
6.
▲
by
Mond_
17d ago
This does sound a lot like there's a real risk of C++ imploding, in some form or another. (Arguably, it has been in that state for a while now.) I personally agree that contracts probably shouldn't be in the standard, but this who
7.
▲
by
Mond_
27d ago
I don't think this goal was ever realistic, it was just a marketing pitch to get a foot in the door.
8.
▲
by
Mond_
27d ago
I run Linux as my primary operating system and I have never even heard of eBPF! I'd be surprised if most end users have.
9.
▲
by
Mond_
1mo ago
> I don't know why this comment's getting down voted. Because just calling something bad does not add a lot to the conversation. It's not thoughtful, interesting, or good.
10.
▲
Remaking Party House
(herecomesthemoon.net)
2 points
by
Mond_
1mo ago
|
0 comments
11.
▲
by
Mond_
1mo ago
Afaik Herb Sutter largely stopped working on Cppfront a few months ago, and was never quite supposed to be a real thing, just a personal playground (or so Sutter claims at this point, anyway). Afaik Carbon is at this point the only attempt
12.
▲
by
Mond_
2mo ago
Stupid question, can't this trivially be solved by having a movable constructor / builder type that then gets turned into a non-movable type when built?
13.
▲
by
Mond_
3mo ago
It's not about having to remember them, it's that you shouldn't waste these short single symbols on operations that are only rarely used. This stuff (especially the ternary) are a step backwards. There is just no reason to wa
14.
▲
by
Mond_
3mo ago
> Money can't buy happiness, but it can buy less unhappiness > Money can very much buy happiness. Most of the things that make you unhappy can be remedied with money Was it too hard to read beyond the first comma?
15.
▲
by
Mond_
3mo ago
It's their own blog and they can do whatever they feel like to break up the flow. I think it's quite charming tbh
16.
▲
by
Mond_
3mo ago
Sort specifically is kind of a weird example, but C++ is full of awful naming. std::map (which is not a hash map, which is what most people would expect), std::move (which doesn't move), std::vector (which is not a vector), and std::ve
17.
▲
by
Mond_
3mo ago
Yes, with the trade-off of essentially requiring exceptions, which are also banned in some codebases.
18.
▲
by
Mond_
3mo ago
Is it really, though, or is it just in comparison to C++? Tbh I never expected that experiment to go anywhere. I guess that leaves Carbon (and large scale efforts to rewrite C++ in Rust).
19.
▲
by
Mond_
4mo ago
May I ask how far you got? It's not a good representation of industrial engineering, for sure, but I do like the actual logistics management and "how do I deal with my technical debt" later in the game. I think most of this o
20.
▲
by
Mond_
4mo ago
It isn't anymore, though, that's kind of the whole point of the article.
21.
▲
by
Mond_
4mo ago
Strategic vision. The common sentiment is that you didn't really want to do that. You expect higher returns from only having a single base model.
22.
▲
by
Mond_
5mo ago
How about just panic? If a wrap happens and you don't expect it, it's almost always a severe bug. Then, dedicated APIs for wrapping behavior where you expect it to happen.
23.
▲
by
Mond_
5mo ago
Not OP, but I've had the same conclusion. It's a bit cheeky to call it a puzzle game, but I don't think it's strictly wrong. Imo it's better to approach Demon's Souls as an exploration puzzle game with RPG stuf
24.
▲
by
Mond_
5mo ago
No shade thrown, but I always preferred my game with some amount of story or artistic ambition beyond mere puzzling. I'd take Void Stranger or probably even Deadly Rooms of Death: The Second Sky over Stephen's Sausage Roll any day
25.
▲
by
Mond_
5mo ago
I don't think that's what that word means.
26.
▲
by
Mond_
5mo ago
really?
27.
▲
by
Mond_
5mo ago
So, where can I buy a handful for personal use?
28.
▲
by
Mond_
6mo ago
I think that a "minimal viable baseline" type implementation should not break the ODR. In Rust these types of proposals are common, in C++ less so. The incredibly tedious release process encourages everyone to put in just as much
29.
▲
by
Mond_
6mo ago
Well, I've been unable to follow you as well, then. Obviously if they'd used a different type of syntax (e.g. using # for annotations), those would also be compatible with the language spec, and other implementations would still
30.
▲
by
Mond_
6mo ago
It's an overloaded comment. I am personally quite fine with it, I don't think it's bad. but it is an overloaded comment.
More ›