LionessLover

9 ms·

1.
by LionessLover 10y ago
Do turn your adblocker on for that site. I had at some point turned it off to be nice to them - but what I got this time was too much for me. Flashing everywhere, a third of my browser window for ads, and then an ad popup floating across
2.
by LionessLover 10y ago
If you are interested in RTOS (real-time OS) courses I recommend checking edX for the expected September 2016 arrival date of a followup to this course: edX course page: https://www.edx.org/course/embedded-systems-shape
3.
by LionessLover 10y ago
The actual study can be accessed for free on "The Pirate-Bay of Science publications" Sci-Hub: http://science.sciencemag.org.sci-hub.cc/content/351/6280/aa... About Sci-Hub: https://en.wi
4.
by LionessLover 10y ago
Yep. Human brains are made to see faces in clouds - and patterns everywhere. Because its the only way for that little brain to function. In reality nothing is the same unless it's identical (not a copy - but the exact same thing, maybe
5.
by LionessLover 10y ago
> What I'm talking about is extremely elementary Whenever someone doesn't have an argument they resort to such empty phrases, merely repeating over and over "I am right!". Maybe you should have studied some neuroscien
6.
by LionessLover 10y ago
At the bottom of the article: > This is an evolving publication, and I shall be extending it over the coming days and weeks to cover more topics on serverless architecture including some things commonly confused with serverless, and the
7.
by LionessLover 10y ago
Which is wrong. As is the use of "absolutely" - to show that you have the universe-opinion. What hubris. And it does not matter that some guy "himself" posted some opinion either. Right were you link to there are differe
8.
by LionessLover 10y ago
> pg wrote the site What does ownership have to do with it, you fucking moron? That does not make him more right than any other human being. Ownership means one can impose ones will, it does not mean you are omniscient.
9.
by LionessLover 10y ago
> pg wrote the site What does ownership have to do with it? That does not make him more right than any other human being. Ownership means one can impose ones will, it does not mean you are omniscient.
10.
by LionessLover 10y ago
But the point is that it does not do that. A neural network does not work like a computer. It does not have to predict. It is a parallel flow from input to output AT ONCE. There is no "processing" like in a CPU where it takes
11.
by LionessLover 10y ago
At the bottom of the article: > This is an evolving publication, and I shall be extending it over the coming days and weeks to cover more topics on serverless architecture including some things commonly confused with serverless, and the
12.
by LionessLover 10y ago
Terms such as "serverless" don't have a fixed sharp-edged meaning but are very fuzzy categories, except on a per-person basis, where you may (will) find people insisting on a specific meaning. When this story was submitted on
13.
by LionessLover 10y ago
Which is wrong. As is the use of "absolutely" - to show that you have the universe-opinion. What hubris. And it does not matter that some guy "himself" posted some opinion either. Right were you link to there are diffe
14.
by LionessLover 10y ago
Because the system JS uses is an ISO standard, it is a problem not just for JS, it works for the majority of use cases, and implementing a second number system (the old one will have to be kept forever) increases cost and complexity signifi
15.
by LionessLover 10y ago
Depends on what you mean by "predict". Also, unfortunately I don't even remember where I saw or heard this in a lecture, but when studying neuroscience I remember to have seen exactly this question and an example showing th
16.
by LionessLover 10y ago
> like are we living in a simulation? What does that even mean? The entire question only makes sense from a human point of view.
17.
by LionessLover 10y ago
> What blows my mind is how positive the HN crowd were about the acquisition of Tumblr at the time: Self-selection bias. Those who post in a given topic are not always the same people. What blows MY mind is how it is possible to wonder h
18.
by LionessLover 10y ago
While reading that article the page changed its font-size by at least 150% five times (thus far). No I did not press any buttons. There is some detection Javascript running that gets confused. Maybe my touch screen (laptop)? Page zoom does
19.
by LionessLover 10y ago
Quoting from the actual Google reply: > We don't just ignore the autocomplete attribute, however. In the WHATWG standard, we defined a series of new autocomplete values that developers can use to better inform the browser about wha
20.
by LionessLover 10y ago
Uhm.... your reply makes no sense - what he says is in support of the Chrome decision.
21.
by LionessLover 10y ago
In this context, a great lecture about ancient Silicon Valley history: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZTC_RxWN_xo Lecture brought to you by The Computer History Museum in Mountain View, CA ( http://www.computerhi
22.
by LionessLover 10y ago
And even more people feel the need to let us know they are "done" with reading such articles. Each time.
23.
by LionessLover 10y ago
> I would love to hear from anyone who read this article and it changed their life. Now apply what you wrote to your own text.
24.
by LionessLover 10y ago
So should be a voice actor? Are you completely insane? What idiotic nonsense is your cognitive dissonance "I cannot possibly be wrong regardless how stupid what I said is" going to produce next?
25.
by LionessLover 10y ago
I came up with a story that intuitively shows the difference of doing the seemingly exact same thing on different levels when I lived in the SF Bay Area - where I had ants in almost all apartments I lived in during the summer. The story is
26.
by LionessLover 10y ago
It isn't about HER, it is about her VOICE. Criticizing someone for something they have zero control over is on a level below the shit layer.
27.
by LionessLover 10y ago
Your "criticism" is the lowest of the low. What can anybody do about the "frequency" of their voice? YOU are unpleasant to READ. Consider that - unlike the "problem" you invent this is one that you are actu
28.
by LionessLover 10y ago
> into targeting your person Eh, what???
29.
by LionessLover 10y ago
Of course, in "capitalism" that doesn't happen - instead banks and other "too large to fail" companies are just given money, or they are sort-of nationalized - but without actually doing so (GM, Chrysler for example
30.
by LionessLover 10y ago
You would be more believable if you had practiced what you preach and picked one of your favorite politicians to criticize, not one from the other side. Seem hypocritical.

More ›