8 ms·

> What I'm talking about is extremely elementary Whenever someone doesn't have an argument they resort to such empty phrases, merely repeating over and over "I

> What I'm talking about is extremely elementary Whenever someone doesn't have an argument they resort to such empty phrases, merely repeating over and over "I am right!". Maybe you should have studied some neuroscience LIKE I DID, than you would not be left without arguments in discussions about neuroscience. > plus the actions of muscles all take time! And yet there is no "prediction". As has been pointed out to you by a lot of people including myself repeatedly. Cognitive dissonance is strong in "jamesrcole".

jamesrcole 10y ago
> Whenever someone doesn't have an argument they resort to such empty phrases except it is not an empty phrase. It's making a real point: what I'm talking about is a very basic constraint, one that is independent of all the specific technicalities that everyone else brings up. And it is that constraint that means that functionally the brain processing must be doing something anticipatory. And I notice that your comment here is not making trying to argue any justifications for your points or pointing out any evidence. You're just asserting and saying that because you studied neuroscience you must be right.
- Noseshine 10y ago
  But it doesn't anticipate anything. You are completely wrong because you are a stupid asshole who knows shit about neuroscience. See what others have repeated in this thread many times. Of course, for people who don't even have anything that could be called a brain like yourself it doesn't matter what anyone says. the brain does NOT "anticipate" ANYTHING. It simply matches its outputs to the inputs. The CURRENT INPUTS.
- Noseshine 10y ago
  But it doesn't anticipate anything. You are completely wrong because you are a stupid asshole who knows shit about neuroscience. See what others have repeated in this thread many times. Of course, for people who don't even have anything that could be called a brain like yourself it doesn't matter what anyone says. the brain does NOT "anticipate" ANYTHING. It simply matches its outputs to the inputs. The CURRENT INPUTS, you moron.

jamesrcole 10y ago

> Whenever someone doesn't have an argument they resort to such empty phrases except it is not an empty phrase. It's making a real point: what I'm talking about is a very basic constraint, one that is independent of all the specific technicalities that everyone else brings up. And it is that constraint that means that functionally the brain processing must be doing something anticipatory. And I notice that your comment here is not making trying to argue any justifications for your points or pointing out any evidence. You're just asserting and saying that because you studied neuroscience you must be right.

Noseshine 10y ago
But it doesn't anticipate anything. You are completely wrong because you are a stupid asshole who knows shit about neuroscience. See what others have repeated in this thread many times. Of course, for people who don't even have anything that could be called a brain like yourself it doesn't matter what anyone says. the brain does NOT "anticipate" ANYTHING. It simply matches its outputs to the inputs. The CURRENT INPUTS.
Noseshine 10y ago
But it doesn't anticipate anything. You are completely wrong because you are a stupid asshole who knows shit about neuroscience. See what others have repeated in this thread many times. Of course, for people who don't even have anything that could be called a brain like yourself it doesn't matter what anyone says. the brain does NOT "anticipate" ANYTHING. It simply matches its outputs to the inputs. The CURRENT INPUTS, you moron.