JoeNr76

6 ms·

1.
by JoeNr76 3y ago
I never said that you should prefer 3 star restaurant. I was responding to the specific claim that home cooked meals are always better than eating out.
2.
by JoeNr76 3y ago
What you find regrettable is your problem, not mine. If I invite people, I do it for the people, if I go out to eat I do it for the food. I don't see why this regrettable just because you think it is.
3.
by JoeNr76 3y ago
> I think nobody in my country would say going out to eat is better than eating at home. You haven't eaten at a 2 or 3 star restaurant then. They use ingredients you don't have access too, using techniques you can't use at
4.
by JoeNr76 3y ago
Completely anecdotally: I am 46yo. And I was in a reading slump for most of my fourties. I used to be an avid reader until I became a father and my 3 children began taking up more of my time. And I got a shorter attention span too. I signed
5.
by JoeNr76 3y ago
You can use verbs passively to do something on something else. Or you can have your program or process do it. Logically, I see no difference between: "The HandlerCreationFactory created a Handler based on the Request." (oop) &quot
6.
by JoeNr76 4y ago
It only targets big "platform providers" not startups. It even levels the playing field for those startups. People get so ideologically tangled that they just knee jerk.
7.
by JoeNr76 4y ago
In the case of iMessage, Apple has a competitive advantage that stifles competition, not enhances it. Setting a baseline for interoperability is not the same as requiring them all to be the same.
8.
by JoeNr76 4y ago
Not just that, it's removing barriers for competition. Which is what good regulations is all about. (and, technically it more than just bubble color, it's also including everyone in group chats)
9.
by JoeNr76 4y ago
Even after all these years, people still have this misconception about TTD. No idea where it came from.
10.
by JoeNr76 4y ago
No, it was earlier. I was subscribed to this Dogbert newsletter and it was increasingly obvious that he was not as logical as he thought he was. Like really believing in positive affirmations because he did a good exam after doing them.
11.
by JoeNr76 4y ago
translated: Never complain, proles, just be glad you get some scraps from that ever-growing economy. Even if it's less than your parents.
12.
by JoeNr76 4y ago
The only questionable part is end-to-end encryption. I don't see how you can make your messaging apps interoperable and have E2E encryption. Most of the other things: mostly good. Apple and Google need to be taken down a peg or 10.
13.
by JoeNr76 4y ago
The article is wrong. I don't get how this could make it to the top. It has nothing to do with greenhouse emissions, but with nitrogen compound emission. See https://www.dutchnews.nl/features/2022/06/what
14.
by JoeNr76 4y ago
yes. When I get called in as a senior consultant for some business app, it's always for the same reason: development speed has crawled to an almost stop. And it is always caused by unnecessary complexity. I blame the fact that design p
15.
by JoeNr76 4y ago
Limits on free speech by government is dangerous. Private companies enforcing rules you have agreed to when you became a member, is something completely different.
16.
by JoeNr76 4y ago
Wild speculation with a sprinkle of logic (garbage assumptions lead to garbage conclusions) HOWEVER, I have skimmed through it by now and the last paragraph is actually quite good. It takes a while to get there and the chosen examples aren&
17.
by JoeNr76 4y ago
As others have said: you need to think about your functionality as a public API. How the API works under the hood shouldn't affect your tests. So how do you test private methods? You don't, with the exception of testing during dev
18.
by JoeNr76 4y ago
I stopped reading right here: "Considering the factors mentioned above, we can reason that unit tests are only useful to verify pure business logic inside of a given function." That just isn't true and it makes the rest of th
19.
by JoeNr76 5y ago
Nah. EBM does explain the obesity crisis. We're just eating more. The average American consumes more than 3,600 calories daily – a 24% increase from 1961, when the average was just 2,880 calories. And that's just the average.
20.
by JoeNr76 5y ago
That's why the scientific literature uses the better term "ultra-processed" to mark the difference between, say a loaf of bread and a chicken nugget.
21.
by JoeNr76 5y ago
This is already 6 years old: https://cei.org/blog/study-wounds-the-carbohydrate-insulin-t... Basically, as long as proteine is controlled for, there is no long term fat-loss difference between dietary compositions. See
22.
by JoeNr76 5y ago
Why are we still talking about the CIM? It failed practically every test we threw at it. Sure low carb diets can make you lose weight, but that's because you eat less, not because of insuline.
23.
by JoeNr76 5y ago
Of course. Becoming a milionaire because your dad gave you a million is not what people understand as being meritocratic. They already get a lot of advantages during their life because of the position and wealth of their parents. Is it bad
24.
by JoeNr76 6y ago
Real strict type checking (as in, eg, Haskell ) does indeed make your code resistant to a certain type of bug. But the kind of type checking Typescript gives you is mostly useful as autocomplete. (and, if I'm not mistaken, at run time,
25.
by JoeNr76 6y ago
This was my main reason to switch to mainly front-end: to get away from clunky, badly written C# and Java back-end programming. 2/3 of a code file are just the coder wrangling the OOP typesystem instead of just coding the functionality
26.
by JoeNr76 6y ago
Well, I don't see why developing an application for transforming csv files to xls files would go faster than developing an application that uploaded csv files to a database. I could see that i could be a rush job problem, but in this c
27.
by JoeNr76 6y ago
It might start out as a function, then become a factory, then an object and if you bind your test to the implementation details of this code, you will have to rewrite your test every time you refactor your code. Not ideal.
28.
by JoeNr76 6y ago
"The smallest amount of testable code. Often a single method/function," I hate (HAAAAATE) that definition of unit test. That's how some IDEs implemented unit tests, but it's not what was originally meant with the
29.
by JoeNr76 7y ago
I've been doing Angular for 5+ years now. I think you might be using it wrong because I never experienced anything like that.
30.
by JoeNr76 7y ago
I do. Are you asking?

More ›