JAlexoid

6 ms·

1.
by JAlexoid 7d ago
If they can't keep up, that means that they're not using AI to do reviews
2.
by JAlexoid 7d ago
Starting Pixel 8(including 8a) the support window is 7y for those devices.
3.
by JAlexoid 7d ago
I had to upgrade my 2021 iPad 9gen to a newer model to actually make is reasonably usable. So I am not sure about recent track record for Apple. My 2021 Pixel 6 works well for my mother and is getting updates.
4.
by JAlexoid 7d ago
Have you never heard of this derogative term? Plenty of arrogant Americans use that term
5.
by JAlexoid 12d ago
If you put 90% of the electronics into the cartridge and the printer box is just a paper feeder - that's not exactly surprising.
6.
by JAlexoid 12d ago
You couldn't, mostly because Bell Labs is owned by Nokia now.
7.
by JAlexoid 1mo ago
Even being stored in EU doesn't preclude your data from being targeted by signals intelligence. Which is different than requiring US based companies to provide non-US data to American government. Does fastmail have a US presence? If no
8.
by JAlexoid 1mo ago
I agree. Operating systems have become too fast.
9.
by JAlexoid 2mo ago
It reads like you're in favor of banning resale and lending(aka libraries) of books... because the authors aren't compensated. There's such a thing as fair use and digitizing privately owned printed material is absolutely leg
10.
by JAlexoid 2mo ago
You seem to think that AI companies sell you content, which is false. You get a service. The service is using their compute power to run a model and their scientists to build the model.
11.
by JAlexoid 2mo ago
Long story short - publishing houses are venture capital firms. Most of their investments fail miserably, but they only need one Google/Stephen King.
12.
by JAlexoid 2mo ago
Since we're on the criminal side - what criminal statute would apply to Anthropic? And what criminal statutes were used for the cases we're supposed to compare to?
13.
by JAlexoid 2mo ago
Infringement is a civil lawsuit, with financial punishment only.
14.
by JAlexoid 2mo ago
Maybe because Anthropic isn't actively facilitating copyright infringement?..
15.
by JAlexoid 2mo ago
I used to use the initial letters of a whole paragraph from Lord of The Rings as my password. Some of us have a good enough memory.
16.
by JAlexoid 3mo ago
You're not understanding this. A company can create a new search engine and Google Search isn't obligated to even mention it. The issue is when achieving market dominance and new service is integrated into the dominant product.
17.
by JAlexoid 3mo ago
We're talking about a layman. Not to mention that different genres have different quality of AI music. I would easily recognize AI generated orchestra, while I can bet a lot of money that AI generated EDM is hard to distinguish from so
18.
by JAlexoid 3mo ago
You're absolutely right. They can just come up with a few thousand dollars per hour for a few hours per song. Everyone has a few thousand dollars just lying around
19.
by JAlexoid 3mo ago
Because AI music can be still valuable. People who like to write lyrics, but can't afford to pay a vocalist still deserve to get their art materialized and distributed.
20.
by JAlexoid 3mo ago
We have a lot of pop-slop, now it's AI slop. There's a reason why a few artists persist through the decades, while others just fade into obscurity.(think of how long Madonna, Cher have been around)
21.
by JAlexoid 3mo ago
AI generated music is good, the singing (vocals and lyrics) is typically very bad. AI generated music is also not at all original. Which scares all of the "artists" who lack originality.
22.
by JAlexoid 3mo ago
I think we underestimate how much of reading happens from the shallow romance section of the bookstores. It's big business and is really not that deep. For someone who isn't part of that world(which is big business) to judge what
23.
by JAlexoid 5mo ago
AFIK: Even the slightest modification of the work is transformative and will produce copyrighted material. It does not have to be substantial transformation.
24.
by JAlexoid 6mo ago
I stand corrected. It was a very recent addition
25.
by JAlexoid 6mo ago
Unfortunately you did grant that permission. Once you granted the permission for someone to hold a copy, they have the permission to process it. I can assure you, that you didn't grant a license with an exclusive list of operations tha
26.
by JAlexoid 6mo ago
Charging for a service isn't rent-seeking.
27.
by JAlexoid 6mo ago
Funny thing is that building an LLM isn't as complex as you might think. But the problem of attribution is easily understandable to any human with a modicum of intelligence. Imagine that you have a trillion input images, with every sin
28.
by JAlexoid 6mo ago
I don't believe that you require to do much to claim copyright over an output of an LLM. The input prompt is under copyright - a simple modification to the source code will grant copyright to you.
29.
by JAlexoid 6mo ago
Software is considered a complete piece of work. Therefore as long as you modify a single character - that whole product is under your copyright.
30.
by JAlexoid 6mo ago
The only problem that people see in these models is the money flows. If it all was non-profit - then no one would raise the ethical issue.

More ›