IhateAI

6 ms·

1.
by IhateAI 7mo ago
Most ridiculous valuation in the history of markets. Cant wait to watch these compsnies crash snd burn when people give up on the slot machine.
2.
by IhateAI 7mo ago
Yeah, this is why I dont get the argument that LLMs are good for bootstrapping. Especially anything serious. Sure these things can technically frontload a lot of work at the beginning of a project, but I would argue the design choices made
3.
by IhateAI 7mo ago
local first is not the future, lmfao, maybe in 10-20 years. It currently cost ~80k-100k to run a pretty meh Kimi 2.5 at decent tok p/s, which is rather useless anyways. And that doesn't allow you to run any multi-agent sessions. B
4.
by IhateAI 7mo ago
Yeah, but humans still had to work to create those websites, it increased jobs, didn't replace them (this is happening). This will devalue all labor that has anything to do with i/o on computers, if not outright replace a lot of i
5.
by IhateAI 7mo ago
I love paying some billionaire $0.0001 to use his thinking machine / Think for me SaaS. I love my competency and speed being rented from a billionaire, removing all value of my labor and agency. I really feel sorry for all of you LLM p
6.
by IhateAI 7mo ago
Previously, open source software didn't contribute to automating away jobs, at least not at scale. Open Source libraries weren't potentially maintaining themselves (I know we aren't there yet, but that seems to be the goal).
7.
by IhateAI 7mo ago
It liberates those who have massive resources to run gigantic models at whatever scale they want. Corporations and billionaires will get Ti-Nspires we get Ti-83s. I do not agree that inference will get more affordable in time to prevent har
8.
by IhateAI 7mo ago
Sorry if I'm shaming. I suppose you're right, someone will probably build them. But in order to prevent bad outcomes for the average joe/worker we are can't just hand optimizations over to corporations for free in the fo
9.
Denver tech company laying off hundreds, cited AI-driven efficiency(9news.com)
2 points by IhateAI 7mo ago|3 comments
10.
by IhateAI 7mo ago
llms are totally empowering people! The ruling class is definately not weaponizing these tools to devalue the your labor, pocket millions! If you're a surviving engineer at one of these companies enjoy working twice as much for the sam
11.
by IhateAI 7mo ago
Yes, if an LLM from one of these major models is prompt injected its likely its will say something like that at the end, and is good at differentiating between obviously hidden content. Or it will ignore it all together. That would be the r
12.
by IhateAI 7mo ago
I'm 100% sure its already happening
13.
by IhateAI 7mo ago
This wont work on any of the most recent releases for most (except maybe grok)
14.
by IhateAI 7mo ago
Oh damn, all these weird ass sites are starting to look the same. I've seen like 10x sites now with this same color scheme/layout. Whats going on here.
15.
by IhateAI 7mo ago
"auxiliary tool forgings" You aren't a serious person.
16.
by IhateAI 7mo ago
I'm not trying to signal superiority, I'm legitimately worried about the value of my livelihood and skills I'm passionate about. What if McDonalds went around telling chefs that they're cooking wrong, that there's n
17.
by IhateAI 7mo ago
So because those people didn't defend their livelihoods we shouldn't either? I'd say there's very little jobs that SWE automated away outside of SOME data entry, SWE's built abstractions on top of existing processes
18.
by IhateAI 7mo ago
I think in-line autocomplete is likely not that dangerous, if it's used in this manner responsibly, it's the large agentic tools that are problematic for your brain imo. But in-line autocompletes aren't going to raise billion
19.
by IhateAI 7mo ago
Wow, a bunch of NFT people used to say the same thing. lmao, please explain to me why these companies should be valued at 200x revenue.. They are providing autocomplete APIs. How come Google's valuation hasn't increased 100-200x,
20.
by IhateAI 7mo ago
I definitely think what you're losing is extremely important, and can't be compensated with LLMs once its gone. Back when automatic piano players came out, if all the world's best piano players stopped playing and mostly just
21.
by IhateAI 7mo ago
It was always intended to be used that way, the programmatic advertising industry is a product of US Nat Sec.
22.
by IhateAI 7mo ago
Its funny you mention this, I was going to say that the only communities I've found online where +EV thinking is the norm is in professional gambling circles. However, those exist basically only in closed off discord and telegram chats
23.
by IhateAI 7mo ago
Yeah, also if a SaaS costs, 10k a year, I promise its not not more cost effecient to pull your 10k a month engineer off their usual work to build and then maintain some vibe coded slope everytime an edge case occurs. Also many customers of
24.
by IhateAI 8mo ago
I refer to it as "Think for me SaaS", and it should be avoided like the plague. Literally, it will give your brain a disease we haven't even named yet. It's as if I woke up in a world where half of resturaunts worldwide
25.
by IhateAI 8mo ago
You are literally telling me that an open source model costs $80k "at decent tok/ps (whatever that means)" to run a single session as proof something. How come people aren't dropping Anthropic for Kimi, it costs 10x less
26.
by IhateAI 8mo ago
It's weird though, the critics of LLMs have very good points, usually very reasonable but when they share them they get downvoted and criticized like someone who was critical of NFTs in 2022. I wonder why that is, and what it portends
27.
by IhateAI 8mo ago
Well yes, I assume that too. But the article says they'll pocket the earnest money which makes zero sense. Probably another example of someone incapable of writing an article by themselves and used an LLM. >"7. If they get fart
28.
by IhateAI 8mo ago
I like your website design, but hate llms. Good luck.
29.
by IhateAI 8mo ago
Hmm, I guess you technically just need to convince a notary that you're the seller and with virtual closings/ mobile notaries I guess that's probably pretty easy. But still the scammer would never see the earnest money, unles
30.
by IhateAI 8mo ago
Also, just like how in centuries past, rulers/governments bet their entire Empires on the predictions of magicians / seers they consulted. Machine learning Engineers are the new seers and their models are their magic tricks. It se

More ›