Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
IhateAI
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
31.
▲
by
IhateAI
8mo ago
This doesn't make sense, earnest money would be in escrow until the title clears. The scammer would never have access to the earnest money, nor would it ever get transferred to them unless the buyer took too long to close, or didn'
32.
▲
by
IhateAI
8mo ago
"Is they key unlock here"
33.
▲
by
IhateAI
8mo ago
Just code it yourself, you might surprise yourself :)
34.
▲
by
IhateAI
8mo ago
You're delusional, I didn't even include the labor the install and run the damn thing. More than 500k
35.
▲
by
IhateAI
8mo ago
Imagine thinking that $80k setups to run Kimi and serve a single user session is evidence that inference providers are running at cost, or even close to it. Or that this fact is some sort of proof that token pricing will come down. All you
36.
▲
by
IhateAI
8mo ago
I'm not making any guesses, I happen to know for a fact what it costs. Please go try to sell inference and compete on price. You actually have no clue what you're talking about. I knew when I sent that response I was going to get
37.
▲
by
IhateAI
8mo ago
What do weights have to do with how much it costs to run inference? Inference is heavily subsidized, the economics of it don't make any sense. Anthropic and OpenAI could open source their models and it wouldn't make it any cheaper
38.
▲
by
IhateAI
8mo ago
Offshore windmills legitimately do interfere with some of these military radars monitoring the coastline that are probably top secret, or so I'm told by people that would know. However, I doubt that's the only reason of course.
39.
▲
by
IhateAI
8mo ago
This is the equivalent of a toddler being entertained by the sound the straps on their Velcro shoes make when they get peeled back and forth.
40.
▲
by
IhateAI
8mo ago
More adoption? I don't think so... It feels to me that these models && tools are getting more verbose/consuming more tokens to compensate for a decrease in usage. I know my usage of these tools has fallen off a cliff as it
41.
▲
by
IhateAI
8mo ago
Just use lists, "Your Followers" tab and never touch the "For You" tab and its basically the same as Twitter was 5 years ago.
42.
▲
by
IhateAI
8mo ago
My guess would be certain IPs associated with universities, corporations and government institutions.
43.
▲
by
IhateAI
8mo ago
$5-9 a GB, its an infinite money glitch actually.
44.
▲
by
IhateAI
8mo ago
Its probably more of a me "problem". But I'm sure there are plenty of others that share my sentiment. It doesn't really have anything to do with it being familiar, familiar can be good, but what I'm talking about is
45.
▲
by
IhateAI
8mo ago
How do you stop mobile proxies operating through similar nefarious business models... CGNAT prevents you from easily identifying the exit nodes.
46.
▲
by
IhateAI
8mo ago
Yep, and I refuse to use sites that look like this. Lovable built frontend/landing pages have a similar feel. Instant lost of trust and desire to try it out.
47.
▲
by
IhateAI
8mo ago
So many session cookies getting harvested right now.
48.
▲
by
IhateAI
8mo ago
Thank you, Its giving NFTs in 2022. About the most useful thing you could do with these things: 1. Resell tokens by scamming general public with false promises (IDEs, "agentic automation tools"), collect bag. 2. Impress brain dead
49.
▲
by
IhateAI
8mo ago
I don't think so, but you're still looking at a giant investment that can't really be justified for their capability.
50.
▲
by
IhateAI
8mo ago
Why would someone want to spend half a million dollars on GPUs and components (if not more) to run one year old models that genuinely aren't useful? You can't self host trillion parameter models unless you own a datacenter lol (or