FiberBundle

8 ms·

1.
by FiberBundle 5d ago
Does anybody actually know whether there's a limit to the complexity LLMs are capable of dealing with in a codebase? It's very obvious that they don't write code that is suitable for people to understand it (and it's gon
2.
by FiberBundle 9d ago
Well, of course Anthropic employees would say that, since they likely do the same. Claiming that your primary competitor doesn't engage in a certain malicious practice is supposed to make it look as if there's no way you would too
3.
by FiberBundle 9d ago
Whenever I see comments defending AI companies, I look at the account's creation date, and interestingly almost all of them were created post 2024.
4.
by FiberBundle 25d ago
Is it really interesting though? It's essentially just vibe-coded by people who are unqualified for this kind of work. One of the authors claimed that what qualified them was having worked on a large-scale postgres cluster; they never
5.
by FiberBundle 1mo ago
Have you considered the possibility that you're simply not as good as the experts, and that your experience of LLMs being capable of performing your work up to your standards doesn't imply that experts are necessarily in denial?
6.
by FiberBundle 2mo ago
I desperately hope that the Andrew Kelley style of software engineering will survive all of this; that users will continue to value quality and not be content with slop. This, of course, presumes that products built fully by agents will pro
7.
by FiberBundle 3mo ago
Most of these republicans/libertarians only want the government to leave them alone. They don't care when a company they aren't affiliated with is regulated. You can see Marc Andreesen celebrating the government's decisi
8.
by FiberBundle 5mo ago
Another potential reason, not mentioned in the article, is that open source models obviously pose the biggest threat in the labs' ability to monetize their tech. Anthropic especially seems to be very anti open-source. If frontier model
9.
by FiberBundle 5mo ago
Looks as if AI sucks at frontend tbh.
10.
by FiberBundle 5mo ago
To me it makes absolutely zero sense that they would decide to not release the model to the public because of the effects that it would have due to its exploitation capabilities. Previous models were also capable of providing harmful inform
11.
by FiberBundle 5mo ago
This could also be a marketing strategy. Make your models perform worse towards the end of a model's cycle, so that the next model appears as if more progress has been made than there actually has been.
12.
by FiberBundle 6mo ago
This is the dumbest take there is about vibe coding. Claiming that managing complexity in a codebase doesn't matter anymore. I can't imagine that a competent engineer would come to the conclusion that managing complexity doesn&#x2
13.
by FiberBundle 6mo ago
This is like saying that innovative medical drugs could be sold at a profit if only there was no patent protection and the innovative companies would still invest in R&D. Yes, on a token level pure inference costs might be profitable, b
14.
SlopCodeBench: Benchmarking How Coding Agents Degrade over Long-Horizon Tasks(arxiv.org)
2 points by FiberBundle 6mo ago|0 comments
15.
by FiberBundle 6mo ago
To help readers view the content of the article with scepticism, given the results the advice in it seems to produce.
16.
by FiberBundle 6mo ago
Pine Town [1], the "whimsical infinite multiplayer canvas of a meadow", also looks like pure slop. [1] https://pine.town/
17.
by FiberBundle 7mo ago
I'm kind of sceptical about the altruistic motives here. Giving this to open source maintainers also solves the problem of identifying high quality feedback/rewards for their rlvr models. With everybody using Claude code it might
18.
by FiberBundle 7mo ago
Lex as in Lex Fridman? I'm baffled that anyone would say that Lex Fridman is a better interviewer than Dwarkesh. Fridman is the one who continuously rambles some incoherent nonsense and completely lacks the intelligence and knowledge
19.
by FiberBundle 7mo ago
How do you see the solo bootstrapping landscape going forward? In what ways do you see agentic coding changing things?
20.
by FiberBundle 8mo ago
The primary value is accrued by the AI labs. You pay hundreds or thousands of dollars a month to train their AI models. While you probably do increase your productivity saving time typing all the code, the feedback that you give the agent a
21.
by FiberBundle 8mo ago
What's funny is that a lot people on Twitter claiming that they can just vibe-code away their SaaS subscriptions are building SaaS themselves.
22.
by FiberBundle 8mo ago
Programming without flow state. Nice.
23.
by FiberBundle 9mo ago
It just boggles my mind that anyone would use something like this. Why would one send their data to some unknown company that internally likely just delegates the work to one of the big AI labs?
24.
by FiberBundle 10mo ago
This is inconsistent with people like Hassabis or Sutskever giving time frames while also saying that LLMs won't get us to AGI.
25.
by FiberBundle 1y ago
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=XyQ4ZTS5dGw&pp=ygUZTWl0Y2hlbGw... Not a "100x" boost, but a pretty good take on what tasks agents can do for even very good programmers.
26.
by FiberBundle 1y ago
Do you honestly believe that the opt-out by Anthropic and Cursor means your code won't be used for training their models? Seems likely that they would rather just risk taking a massive fine for potentially solving software development
27.
by FiberBundle 1y ago
In the spacex subreddit there are comments claiming that key engineers have left the company because of differences with leadership/culture. Not sure how credible those are, but spacex has had suspiciously many failures recently.
28.
by FiberBundle 1y ago
Where's the actual evidence for the productivity boost though? Wouldn't one expect a huge increase in valuable software products or a dramatic increase in open source contributions if llms provide this kind of productivity increas
29.
by FiberBundle 1y ago
Would you be ok with giving a range of selling prices?
30.
by FiberBundle 1y ago
I'm not a lawyer, but my interpretation of the lawsuit based on the Wikipedia article is that game results/scores are public facts and hence not copyrightable data. I don't see how the method by which that public data is coll

More ›