FabCH

10 ms·

1.
by FabCH 3d ago
Yes. I have personally done this before, the correct sequence of moves is: 1. Call your neighbor, ask for permission. 2. Check the door 3. Lock the door If you don’t have their phone number, you are not on good enough terms to touch their l
2.
by FabCH 3d ago
Tesla isn’t doing the scanning though, instead somebody thinks they are scanning Tesla, but Tesla points them to someone else. The scanner is likely illegal. The pointing is… so stupid nobody thought to make a law about it.
3.
by FabCH 3d ago
Return a HTTP 301 pointing to https://facebook.com ? Might make them scan themselves instead.
4.
by FabCH 3d ago
If the non-profit was walking down the road and rattling everybody’s door lock to see which are unlocked, and having a look around the windows to see if any are open, would that be a crime? Because that is exactly what all of these vulnerab
5.
by FabCH 4d ago
Gamers Nexus paid a lawyer to read the contract and had one of their staff members try to read the entire thing on the TV. The lawyers conclusion is that a non-lawyer basically has no chance of correctly interpreting the contract and the TV
6.
by FabCH 4d ago
The hours of video evidence overlaid with network capture and interviews with security researchers and lawyers they released is not enough for you? I’m curious, what would meet your bar for investigativ journalism if that didn’t?
7.
by FabCH 7d ago
Europeans have alternative payment networks already. For example, CH has Twint. They are actively being unified into a cross-border payment network. Of all the things to complain, this is the one where they are actually doing something…
8.
by FabCH 7d ago
Article 3 of the Geneva Convention. Laying down your arms is generally considered an expression of surrender and renders protection. Also, who sends scouts unarmed? They should at least have a sidearm.
9.
by FabCH 7d ago
Correct. That's not interpolation though, that's theft.
10.
by FabCH 8d ago
They meant that even the happens-very-fast AI singularity isn’t sub-picosecond. It still exists in time, and has a duration. The event horizon would then be the time period between the singularity becoming inevitable and it actually happen
11.
by FabCH 8d ago
Almost all of human development is interpolation over data we have seen before. It’s not exactly a strong argument against AI.
12.
by FabCH 10d ago
100%. I absolutely would prefer my own country to be a global superpower, but it isn’t. However, currently, only US and Russia have publicly threatened my country, and both are currently engaged in a trade war with us. China on the other ha
13.
by FabCH 10d ago
TBH China is not currently bombing a foreign country for no reason and it is not threatening to invade its allies. It’s not a particularly high bar, but of the big powers, only China currently meets it. And I know you will say „but payment
14.
by FabCH 10d ago
You changed the topic. The topic is not what Codeberg should care about. The topic was trust in the humans behind Codeberg to not delete private repositories on a whim. Codeberg community is free to care about whatever it sees fit. That doe
15.
by FabCH 11d ago
„ and if your intention is fine and good, they'll be OK with it“ That doesn’t work because „fine and good“ doesn’t mean the same thing to Codeberg voters/admins and to a large part of the hacke news population. Notably, Codeberg i
16.
by FabCH 11d ago
From what they list on the website, they don’t offer N+2 reliability / they are not present in sufficient geos to actually act as a CDN.
17.
by FabCH 11d ago
Can I just point out that either the vendor is small and therefor can’t actually offer the N+2 reliability you list as a weakness of self-hosting, or they are large enough for N+2 but then stop being small. My tiny website doesn’t need a CD
18.
by FabCH 11d ago
So is Scaleway…
19.
by FabCH 11d ago
Why do you assume they will be ok with it? They recently made some very ideological decisions…
20.
by FabCH 12d ago
The pricing is bananas. Why on earth is the bandwidth metered? An EU tiny VPS on Scaleway with unlimited bandwidth costs 5€. This thing costs 9€. With limited bandwidth. ?!
21.
by FabCH 19d ago
An artillery crew is armed with the cannon. POWs don’t have attorneys, but they do have rights. Limiting food and medical aid is a war crime. Of course, everybody routinely violates the rights of POWs, and only the losers ever get prosecute
22.
by FabCH 19d ago
Note that the UK would be committing war crimes in this case, since you are not allowed to murder unarmed soldiers, you are supposed to capture them and put them in POW camps. Which is typically called „arresting“ when a government does it
23.
by FabCH 20d ago
No. Although I believe some crimes are not optional and must be prosecuted. Somewhat interesting, even if you as a victim don’t want it, some crimes are simply mandated to be prosecuted.
24.
by FabCH 20d ago
Private prosecution does exist, but only for some crimes. IIRC if the public prosecutor refuses to prosecute libel, I think that is one of the rare few crimes you can prosecute civil-ly.
25.
by FabCH 20d ago
Unless you know what that very specific word means, it’s not obvious to everyone because it’s not the same in all legal systems. It was worth mentioning. It also matters because that means UEFA can only really ask nicely, and hope they get
26.
by FabCH 20d ago
I am not a lawyer, but I do live in Zurich. AFAIK, you can’t actually bring criminal charges as a civilian. You make a complaint to the public prosecutor and they choose to press criminal charges. Some crimes are only prosecuted if somebody
27.
by FabCH 25d ago
I don't really understand this comment. Anything in particular I should be looking for?
28.
by FabCH 25d ago
Visual things often are. I love the visual style. It's especially interesting to set the colour scheme to the orange/yellow glow of reaaaly old school terminals.
29.
by FabCH 26d ago
Counterpoint: Build more TUIs in Rust using Ratatui: https://ratatui.rs/ Why? Because just look at the examples on that page.
30.
by FabCH 1mo ago
Typically, the government takes over a company. The shareholders or owners may or may not receive compensation. Presumably a normal(?) interpretation would be that the British government uses whatever eminent domain law it has and it takes

More ›