Eddy_Viscosity2

7 ms·

1.
by Eddy_Viscosity2 3d ago
Yep. Fire is actually a great example, its both useful and dangerous. And so we have probably 10s of thousands of fire regulations for products, buildings, vehicles. We have fire departments, we have regular fire drills, we think about fire
2.
by Eddy_Viscosity2 3d ago
As mentioned by another commenter, the real danger is that these tools act as amplifiers and enablers for human agents that want to do really bad things. Whereas some crazy group that wants to destroy X for some reason, but had no ability t
3.
by Eddy_Viscosity2 3d ago
10,000% growth! No way that could be wild claim! How dare we doubt them.
4.
by Eddy_Viscosity2 5d ago
I happen to have TWO big boxes of cables. One for home and one for work. Just this week ago I was vindicated by having just the cable someone needed for something. Not having a big box of cables nearby would be make feel exposed and vulnera
5.
by Eddy_Viscosity2 5d ago
> Weekly training volume is the most reliable predictor for injuries. Yep! I tend to do too much (because I like exercising), so I have be deliberate about including light training and recovery days. Absolutely necessary for injury avoid
6.
by Eddy_Viscosity2 5d ago
The political objectives for the war were Netanyahu's who managed quite the move in getting Trump to commit to this. But still an open question how much his motives were rationally objective or senseless passion.
7.
by Eddy_Viscosity2 6d ago
Your first example is the apt one here. In this case openAI was, allegedly, pilfering the work of the scientists into the AI. How is it an unfair standard. OpenAI stole the work of others to build the AI. That's not different than scie
8.
by Eddy_Viscosity2 6d ago
> they could be significantly piggybacking on human progress, This is AI in a nutshell, its a plagiarism machine. An abstraction layer between vast amounts of stolen human-generated data that filters out the liabilities and accountabilit
9.
by Eddy_Viscosity2 7d ago
He's probably already drafting an EO to NASA to rename the sun to "the america".
10.
by Eddy_Viscosity2 7d ago
It is capitalism doing capitalism stuff, but more fundamentally technology is allowing for more centralized control of more things by fewer people. Regardless of ideology, increasing concentration of power has bad outcomes for people (excep
11.
by Eddy_Viscosity2 7d ago
Diesel-generated electrical propulsion in ships have been a thing for a long time. You can use several generators and only fire up the ones you need for the power you need and the ones running can do so in or near their optimal efficiency z
12.
by Eddy_Viscosity2 7d ago
Should they give up pneumatic air guns if the company that supplies then can then control what you build with them, how you build with them, and secretly copies all your designs for their own use. Sure its a good tool, but its also becoming
13.
by Eddy_Viscosity2 9d ago
That half of any sizeable population will always be dumber than the average of that population is thing that feels worrisome even though its just how statistics work.
14.
by Eddy_Viscosity2 9d ago
Being dead doesn't necessarily mean you can't be a senator. Ask Mitch McConnel.
15.
by Eddy_Viscosity2 9d ago
So was Trump. To a true scammer, politics is just another grift.
16.
by Eddy_Viscosity2 9d ago
This is true, but I think my point still holds. If he were to get of jail, say by donating a substantial sum to Trump and then coincidentally getting a full pardon. And then he ran, I don't think that his infamy as a scammer would hurt
17.
by Eddy_Viscosity2 9d ago
> what honestly stops them from just taking our stuff by force? Reminds me of this quote, the attribution was ambiguous so I generalized. "I can hire one half of the working class to kill the other half" - Billionaires
18.
by Eddy_Viscosity2 9d ago
Scamming as a male can actually improve your reputation. Donald Trump is currently the president of the united states despite years of ripping people off. If Bernie Madoff could run as a republican senator, I'd given him decent odds
19.
by Eddy_Viscosity2 10d ago
Not that I'm aware of, but that's just a specific. It could be that it can't work via weight manipulation. That just means they have to do it a different way. The general point is that they do want backdoors and will try to g
20.
by Eddy_Viscosity2 10d ago
Indeed, you don't need to tell it who you are, it will already know to write the backdoors. It may be sensationalized, but that doesn't mean it isn't based on legitimate fears based on actual real current and past actions of
21.
by Eddy_Viscosity2 10d ago
US courts have no problem inventing new rights for sitting US presidents. But if the people want something, they can just go die in a ditch (full of contaminated water, while being lied to about it by government officials). Classic USA.
22.
by Eddy_Viscosity2 11d ago
This is the answer, they moved it out during WWII so the nazi's wouldn't steal it. A number of countries did this, including England.
23.
by Eddy_Viscosity2 13d ago
Most people do not see data centers benefiting them in any way but do benefit from eating meat (because they like it). Also, this is an additional water consumption that in a time when water resources are already strained in many areas fo
24.
by Eddy_Viscosity2 17d ago
> It’s naive to think politically motivated surveillance can’t happen in the UK and elsewhere. It's naive to think it isn't already happening in the UK and elsewhere and has for a long time. The only thing technology is changin
25.
by Eddy_Viscosity2 19d ago
If you in the top part of the K, this is a feature not a problem.
26.
by Eddy_Viscosity2 21d ago
Can't we just get AI to tell us? I'm sure it will confidently give an answer.
27.
by Eddy_Viscosity2 22d ago
I don't know either, and maybe it doesn't or can't work. But also maybe it does and can. I do not have any where near the expertise to know which is the case.
28.
by Eddy_Viscosity2 22d ago
Corporations were created specifically to dilute and diminish the liability of the owners. If those same owners can further reduce liability by passing on to AI agents, then they absolutely will.
29.
by Eddy_Viscosity2 22d ago
No offense nkhola, but even this comment feels entirely like a chatbot response.
30.
by Eddy_Viscosity2 22d ago
It could also mean they are lying. It could be they are being forced to downplay how good the watermarking is because gov agencies want that tool available to them without people knowing about it. We'll have to wait for the next Snowde

More ›