EdHominem

5 ms·

1.
by EdHominem 10y ago
Isn't it amazing that you're in all the racist threads. Oh yes, I'm sure you have so much interesting stuff to tell us about why you're a racist. Here I was thinking you're a normal immigrant-hater but you're
2.
by EdHominem 10y ago
Right, which is why you hate immigrants, and now we see jews as well - because they lie about you. Oh well, I didn't understand you were only racist because you were the victim of a global conspiracy to keep you down. Carry on then.
3.
by EdHominem 10y ago
Branching out from your usual immigrant-hatred for a change, or is this the norm for you?
4.
by EdHominem 10y ago
> Having a perpetual license is basically an infinite future expense even if the cost is trivial. It's a one-time expense if budgeted properly. Buy a perpetuity to cover it. If you ever discontinue the service you can release an unl
5.
by EdHominem 10y ago
Working in a cloud company all of us are pretty conscious of the cycles we consume in our architecture and the resources we consume on our client's machines. If we accidentally ran our debug code fleet-wide I'm sure we'd si
6.
by EdHominem 10y ago
I think that's precisely the trump issue... "Reality" TV costs peanuts and gets more views, even if everything in it is staged.
7.
by EdHominem 10y ago
You're the one who thinks you're informed, and that a judge would overrule the DA if they got out of hand, so I suggest you go find out. I'm pretty much in the camp that the DA would fuck you up and the police and judge would
8.
by EdHominem 10y ago
The DA is the one who offers you a plea bargain, or not, and decides how many counts they charge you with. And recommends charges. But yeah, after that it's all the judge.
9.
by EdHominem 10y ago
So can we simply bulk-send registered letters to everyone involved so they know and we know they know?
10.
by EdHominem 10y ago
If that's the case it's your responsibility to go over their head, all the way if necessary - as it would be for an engineer whose boss said to use Balsa wood for a support instead of steel. If Edward had to do it, we do too.
11.
by EdHominem 10y ago
> Saying the US citizens are involved with that decision is, again, wrong and offensive. How's that defense working for an ISIS funder? "Oh, I didn't send the money for bombs, I sent it for their work with children...&quot
12.
by EdHominem 10y ago
It can be 67 years at the whim of the DA. The maximum punishment is very real and they're just itching to use it. If it was an unbiased roll of the dice that would be one thing, and the average and the distribution would be meaningfu
13.
by EdHominem 10y ago
The managers of this hypothetical software company would surely complain if their cars were remotely disabled because the manufacturer wanted to sell a new model. Similarly their customers should complain (via the courts) when the product t
14.
by EdHominem 10y ago
I've been around NB a fair bit, but never seen the monks. > > "When the dishes are clean, we can talk." > That's addressing a very different issue. That's the generic answer to people who won't cleanup
15.
by EdHominem 10y ago
No, this isn't. If that was your worry you especially wouldn't use proprietary software where the issue is much more prevalent. As others point out, you could pay FOSS maintainers if you wanted to. Instead, people who don't u
16.
by EdHominem 10y ago
It's not a religious question - the same thing would come up if you wanted to setup a large electric train set, or hold a dance class, or anything, and then refused to return the space to its original state. There are no (few) formal r
17.
by EdHominem 10y ago
Did you use a geiger counter to verify the dust was hot? Would something large enough to cause problems with the ram be large enough to detect?
18.
by EdHominem 10y ago
They don't really, not ones that they won't delete when they want the problem to go away. Using corporate forums for problems is a losing game. Yes, this letter should probably reference a bug#, but it should not be in the bug i
19.
by EdHominem 10y ago
Hah, the party that actually tries to make healthcare available is ignoring people... Sure. You're just clinically suggestible and have fallen for the "Only I know what you need" line. You might as well be a well-conditioned
20.
by EdHominem 10y ago
> Do gyms have womens-only sections because women are not as good as men at going to the gym?! "Infringes on your ability" never was the question. There always were many clubs open to women - only a few here and there were men-
21.
by EdHominem 10y ago
Says who? Neither of us saw it, so we can't know. There's a procedure though that we use to determine the likelihood of someone's guilt, based on evidence and legal arguments. Would you like to hear about it?
22.
by EdHominem 10y ago
I think a lot of people say these grandiose things about smart people because they don't want to consider that they simply spent 30+ years doing little but their work/passion and are simply very good. Feynman was a genius, but h
23.
by EdHominem 10y ago
> I assure you my daughter is very real and ceased to be a hypothetical about a year ago Heh. "Hypothetical child or children of unspecified gender". > Calling it "weakness" to gravitate towards something that othe
24.
by EdHominem 10y ago
It's not non-public information, it's non-public insider information, upon which you cannot legally trade. "illegal insider trading requires that you not only trade on the basis of important nonpublic information but that y
25.
by EdHominem 10y ago
Why are you going to tell your hypothetical daughter that it's fine for her to have gender-segregated events and tell your son that it's a bad thing for him to do so? (Because presumably you don't support men (or whites, etc)
26.
by EdHominem 10y ago
You're doing exactly what I'm talking about, you're trying to show how the authority you consider authoritative is right, not trying to understand how in a very real sense, reference counting also is not garbage collection
27.
by EdHominem 10y ago
More like, you're free to ignore the common-sense suggestion to examine the algorithms used as they pertain to your use case, just because someone once said "In theory these two things are equivalent". But it won't help
28.
by EdHominem 10y ago
They offer a system that you can time because they know most people have superstitions that don't work, and they shouldn't be allowed to discriminate when someone finds a method that does work. If they don't want a time-able
29.
by EdHominem 10y ago
> gives the house an additional edge Technically, additional decks reduce the expected edge of a card-counter who has only seen some number of cards. Which functions the same way...
30.
by EdHominem 10y ago
They could have a solution out the door in less than 24h but it may be a mitigation (ie, disable the service) rather than a proper fix. But that's pretty easy. In fact, it's usually the first thing an engineer does when verifying

More ›