Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
DrierCycle
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
1.
▲
by
DrierCycle
10mo ago
Tech is not an extension of the patriarchy?
2.
▲
by
DrierCycle
10mo ago
"Swedish freedom of information laws mean most citizens’ addresses and personal details are openly listed online."
3.
▲
Rising levels of hate forcing women out of Swedish public life
(theguardian.com)
9 points
by
DrierCycle
10mo ago
|
2 comments
4.
▲
An "AI" label fails to trigger negative bias in new pop music study
(psypost.org)
2 points
by
DrierCycle
10mo ago
|
0 comments
5.
▲
by
DrierCycle
10mo ago
When you are developing an autocratic regime within an elected system, criminal extralegal military action reveals who the leaders are who will act criminally (are "loyal") segregating them from the constitutional adherents who op
6.
▲
by
DrierCycle
10mo ago
I'm concerned that coders and the general public will confuse optimization with intelligence. That's the nature of propaganda, substituting sleight of hand to create a false narrative. btw an excellent explanation, thank you.
7.
▲
by
DrierCycle
10mo ago
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/the-british-journal-...
8.
▲
Psychotic delusions evolving to incorporate phones and social media algorithms
(psypost.org)
5 points
by
DrierCycle
10mo ago
|
2 comments
9.
▲
by
DrierCycle
10mo ago
It doesn't happen "btwn ears" and math is an illusion of imprecision. The fundamental barrier is frameworks and computers will not be involved. There will be software obviously. But it will never be computed.
10.
▲
by
DrierCycle
10mo ago
It's not magic. It's neural syntax. And nothing trapped by computation is occurring. It's not a model, it is the world as actions. The computer is a hand-me-down tool under evolution's glass ceiling. This should be obvio
11.
▲
by
DrierCycle
10mo ago
It's science under the creative boundary of binary/symbols. And as analog thinkers, we should be developing far greater tools than these glass ceilings. And yes, having finished the film, it's far more propagandic than it beg
12.
▲
by
DrierCycle
10mo ago
Agency will emerge from exceeding the bottleneck of evolution's hand-me-down tools: binary, symbols, metaphors. As long as these unconscious sportscasters for thought "explain" to us what thought "is", we are trappe
13.
▲
by
DrierCycle
10mo ago
I'm an hour into it, unconvinced. The illusion that agency 'emerges' from rules like games, is fundamentally absurd. This is the foundational illusion of mechanics. It's UFOlogy not science.
14.
▲
by
DrierCycle
10mo ago
Sharp wave ripples, nested oscillations, cohering at action-syntax. The brain is "about actions" and lacks representations.
15.
▲
by
DrierCycle
10mo ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44203562
16.
▲
by
DrierCycle
10mo ago
AlphaFold is optimization, not thinking. Propaganda 'r us.
17.
▲
by
DrierCycle
10mo ago
Symbols and binary will never get us to "I believe that artificial general intelligence (AGI) is achievable." And the problem is circular: as the Riley Verge piece citing Fedorenko https://news.ycombinator.com/item
18.
▲
Common snack enhanced memory and brain vascular function in a 16-week trial
(psypost.org)
3 points
by
DrierCycle
10mo ago
|
0 comments
19.
▲
by
DrierCycle
10mo ago
Sorry, pre frontal cortex.
20.
▲
Oxytocin boosts creativity, but only for approach-oriented people
(psypost.org)
4 points
by
DrierCycle
10mo ago
|
0 comments
21.
▲
by
DrierCycle
10mo ago
The key is that there is no content to thought. It's all nested oscillations. It can't be extracted as symbols, so there is no connection between them. Words play the role of a sportscaster reading the minds of the players by obse
22.
▲
by
DrierCycle
10mo ago
Language may ultimately be maladaptive as it is arbitrary and disconnected from thought. Who cares about the gibberish of logic/philosophy when survival is at stake in ecological balance? The key idea is, there are events. They are rea
23.
▲
by
DrierCycle
10mo ago
As there are no symbols in our brains, using symbols as transport for 'intelligence' is oxymoronic. Symbols are the bottleneck to intelligence, not the referential or representation of it. This is basic stuff, folks. The brain doe
24.
▲
by
DrierCycle
10mo ago
"No inference is theory neutral"
25.
▲
Individual and well-being factors associated w chatbot usage: A 6-country study
(journals.sagepub.com)
1 points
by
DrierCycle
10mo ago
|
0 comments
26.
▲
Scientists observe striking link between AI chatbots and psychological distress
(psypost.org)
2 points
by
DrierCycle
10mo ago
|
0 comments
27.
▲
by
DrierCycle
10mo ago
exactly
28.
▲
by
DrierCycle
10mo ago
It's not evolutionary, that's functionality. There are no algorithms in nature. Evolution is a tinkering process that finds by selection, and functionality is what we post-hoc add to the success. Anything reduced to symbols is sim
29.
▲
Monkeys Have Rhythm
(science.org)
3 points
by
DrierCycle
10mo ago
|
0 comments
30.
▲
by
DrierCycle
10mo ago
Whatever gets predicted by tokens gets summarized by symbols, which are artifacts of language. This gets to the illusory aspects of binary as well, the rabbit hole goes deep.
More ›