DrammBA

7 ms·

1.
by DrammBA 3d ago
> Some AC can go ridiculously low ( http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/3144803.stm ). Did you just post a link to a 23 year old news article with no sources on an http-only site as supporting ev
2.
by DrammBA 6d ago
Folks, your blog post sucks at marketing. Edit: your marketing site actually has excellent marketing information. Edit #2: They've since replaced the blog post with a link to the marketing page. Good reaction time.
3.
by DrammBA 6d ago
This is almost reaching Kubrick’s joke about wanting to film the fake moon landing on location.
4.
by DrammBA 6d ago
> Be kind. Don't be snarky. Converse curiously; don't cross-examine. Edit out swipes. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
5.
by DrammBA 8d ago
I don't have twitter or reddit either, I've just seen what people post online
6.
by DrammBA 8d ago
If twitter and reddit have demonstrated anything is that the fun people are having with image generation is not healthy.
7.
by DrammBA 9d ago
Some times it's okay to mean it.
8.
by DrammBA 1mo ago
Actually they are taking one from Anthropic's playbook and saying it's the user's fault for misunderstanding what "sharing" means.
9.
by DrammBA 1mo ago
That's just "a bunch of extensions of varying quality from one developer" with extra steps
10.
by DrammBA 1mo ago
It's all about trade-offs, do you want a bunch of extensions of varying quality from a bunch of developers, or do you want a bunch of extensions of varying quality from one developer?
11.
by DrammBA 2mo ago
I wish I could see it with fresh eyes without the accumulated knowledge I have of how AI looks. What does this video look like to a person clueless about AI? What do they think of the constant repetition of slow panning shows where barely a
12.
by DrammBA 2mo ago
I understood it more in the line of preventing a company from naming itself "Low sugar" and then blocking other companies from adding the words "Low sugar" to their packaging. Same thing with OpenAI, another company shou
13.
by DrammBA 2mo ago
AFAIK 7-9 hours is the commonly used range, anything less than 7 hours or anything more than 9 can have detrimental effects on how well rested you feel after waking up. Where did you get the notion that adults need exactly 8 hours on the do
14.
by DrammBA 2mo ago
I wanted to ask, why did you go with reverse-engineering using network traffic instead of decompiling the app locally and looking for endpoint definitions?
15.
by DrammBA 2mo ago
cmd+F mouse movement 3 result, 3/3: "Mouse movement is just one example of the signals Precursor evaluates"
16.
by DrammBA 3mo ago
> I’m running the same model on a 48GB MBP with a q4 quant and it’s pretty decent. Context size?
17.
by DrammBA 3mo ago
Also a very good game, https://store.steampowered.com/app/239030/Papers_Please/
18.
by DrammBA 4mo ago
> I think you should be allowed to stop supporting software or shut down your servers. That has nothing to do with Stop Killing Games.
19.
by DrammBA 4mo ago
I believe that's the one thing BAM refuses to acknowledge, they have no legal possesion of the lego sets, that's the beginning and end of it. They are trying their damnest to hide that fact behind a consignment/contract/
20.
by DrammBA 4mo ago
I was so confused by many comments in this post but thanks to you I realized that some people are apparently reading it as 26B and that's why their comments make no sense.
21.
by DrammBA 4mo ago
It sucks to treat the workplace as adversarial, but we unfortunately have to as long as companies have the zero-sum mindset of "wow, everyone is so productive and we're achieving so much, why do we have so many people again?"
22.
by DrammBA 5mo ago
> including somewhat complicated solo card games any suggestions?
23.
by DrammBA 5mo ago
> He is not "your avg dev" and it took him 4 months with llm. To clarify, from TFA: > even before LLMs the implementation was likely something I could do in four months. What changed is that in the same time span, I was able
24.
by DrammBA 5mo ago
You're right to push back. It doesn't — he made it up.
25.
by DrammBA 5mo ago
> Have you ever tried to run anything from the 80/90s era? I take it you're agreeing with the sentiment since you had to go back 40-50 years to make your point.
26.
by DrammBA 5mo ago
I can feel the frustation, nothing dramatic about expressing it This quote from the post resonated with me: > I want to get work done and it doesn't want me to get work done. I want to ship software and it doesn't want me to sh
27.
by DrammBA 5mo ago
> I'm imagining you're doing it because that's how Anthropic prefers to frame it Correct. > would it be valid to interpret that as an attack as well? Yup.
28.
by DrammBA 5mo ago
Definitely Anthropic playing the victim after distilling the whole internet.
29.
by DrammBA 5mo ago
> Opus 4.7 will replace Opus 4.5 and Opus 4.6 Promotional pricing that will probably be 9x when promotion ends, and soon to be the only Opus option on github, that's insane
30.
by DrammBA 5mo ago
Anthropic always summarizes the reasoning output to prevent some distillation attacks

More ›